BACKGROUND: The hereditary kidney disease Alport syndrome (AS) has become a treatable disease: intervention with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors delays end stage renal failure by years. The efficiency of ACE inhibition depends on the onset of therapy-the earlier the better. Therefore, early diagnosis has become increasingly important. To date, robust diagnosis requires renal biopsy and/or expensive genetic analysis, which is mostly performed late after onset of the profound clinical symptoms of this progressive renal disease. Thus, disease biomarkers enabling low-invasive screening are urgently required. METHODS: Fourteen potential proteomic candidate markers (proteins) identified in a previous study in sera from patients exhibiting manifest AS were evaluated in the plasma, serum, and urine collected from a cohort of 132 subjects, including patients with AS and other nephropathies and healthy controls. Quantitation was performed by immunoassays. RESULTS: The serum and plasma levels of none of the 14 proteins evaluated were significantly different among the three groups and therefore could not be used to discriminate between the groups. In contrast, the levels of various biomarker combinations in the urine were significantly different between AS patients and healthy controls. Importantly, some combinations had the potential to discriminate between AS and other nephropathies. CONCLUSIONS: These findings open a window of opportunity for the sensitive and specific early diagnosis of AS. Our results increase the potential for larger scale evaluation of an increased number of patients.
BACKGROUND: The hereditary kidney disease Alport syndrome (AS) has become a treatable disease: intervention with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors delays end stage renal failure by years. The efficiency of ACE inhibition depends on the onset of therapy-the earlier the better. Therefore, early diagnosis has become increasingly important. To date, robust diagnosis requires renal biopsy and/or expensive genetic analysis, which is mostly performed late after onset of the profound clinical symptoms of this progressive renal disease. Thus, disease biomarkers enabling low-invasive screening are urgently required. METHODS: Fourteen potential proteomic candidate markers (proteins) identified in a previous study in sera from patients exhibiting manifest AS were evaluated in the plasma, serum, and urine collected from a cohort of 132 subjects, including patients with AS and other nephropathies and healthy controls. Quantitation was performed by immunoassays. RESULTS: The serum and plasma levels of none of the 14 proteins evaluated were significantly different among the three groups and therefore could not be used to discriminate between the groups. In contrast, the levels of various biomarker combinations in the urine were significantly different between AS patients and healthy controls. Importantly, some combinations had the potential to discriminate between AS and other nephropathies. CONCLUSIONS: These findings open a window of opportunity for the sensitive and specific early diagnosis of AS. Our results increase the potential for larger scale evaluation of an increased number of patients.
Authors: Brianna Dufek; Daniel T Meehan; Duane Delimont; Linda Cheung; Michael Anne Gratton; Grady Phillips; Wenping Song; Shiguang Liu; Dominic Cosgrove Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 10.612