Literature DB >> 23793858

Nationwide prospective study on readmission after umbilical or epigastric hernia repair.

F Helgstrand1, L N Jørgensen, J Rosenberg, H Kehlet, T Bisgaard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary aim of the present study was to investigate risk factors for readmission after elective umbilical and epigastric hernia repair and secondarily to evaluate causes for readmission.
METHODS: All patients with elective umbilical or epigastric hernias registered in The Danish Hernia Database during January 2007-January 2011 were included. A 100 % 30-day follow-up was obtained by merging with administrative data from The Danish National Patient Register.
RESULTS: A total of 6,783 umbilical and epigastric hernia repairs were included (open = 5,634; laparoscopic = 1,149). Readmissions caused by surgical and medical complications related to the hernia repair were observed in 3.6 and 1.5 % of patients, respectively. Surgical complications were mainly due to pain and wound complications, whereas medical complications were mainly cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal complications. There were no significant differences in surgical or medical complication rates and in risk factors for readmission between open and laparoscopic repair, P ≥ 0.229. After open repair, independent risk factors for readmission were umbilical hernia repair (vs epigastric repair) (OR = 1.5, 95 % CI 1.1-2.1), hernia defects >2 cm (OR = 1.7, 95 % CI 1.2-2.5), mesh reinforcement (OR = 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0-1.7), and tacked mesh fixation (OR = 2.6, 95 % CI 1.1-6.0). After laparoscopic repair, female gender was the only independent risk factor for readmission (OR = 1.7, 95 % CI 1.1-2.7).
CONCLUSION: The risk for 30-day readmission after umbilical or epigastric hernia repairs was mainly because of surgical complications. Open mesh repair reduced the risk for readmission in open repairs; no specific approach was found to reduce readmission after laparoscopic repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793858     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-013-1120-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  27 in total

1.  Risk factors for complications in groin hernia surgery: a national register study.

Authors:  Karl-Johan Lundström; Gabriel Sandblom; Sam Smedberg; Pär Nordin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Why is the surgical high-risk patient still at risk?

Authors:  H Kehlet; M Mythen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Same-day admissions and other cost-saving strategies for elective aortoiliac surgery.

Authors:  K D Calligaro; R Dandura; M J Dougherty; D A DeLaurentis; C A Raviola
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences.

Authors:  T F Andersen; M Madsen; J Jørgensen; L Mellemkjoer; J H Olsen
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1999-06

5.  Mesh shrinkage and pain in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing suture versus tack mesh fixation.

Authors:  Guido Beldi; Markus Wagner; Lukas E Bruegger; Anita Kurmann; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Kamal M F Itani; Kwan Hur; Lawrence T Kim; Thomas Anthony; David H Berger; Domenic Reda; Leigh Neumayer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-04

Review 7.  Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair.

Authors:  Ulrike Muschaweck
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Accuracy of ICD-10 codes for surveillance of Clostridium difficile infections, France.

Authors:  Gabrielle Jones; Namik Taright; Pierre Yves Boelle; Jeanne Marty; Valérie Lalande; Catherine Eckert; Frédéric Barbut
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  An Effective Approach to Improving Day-Case Rates following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M G Clarke; T Wheatley; M Hill; G Werrett; G Sanders
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2011-04-07

10.  Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression.

Authors:  Zoran Bursac; C Heath Gauss; David Keith Williams; David W Hosmer
Journal:  Source Code Biol Med       Date:  2008-12-16
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Current options in umbilical hernia repair in adult patients.

Authors:  Hakan Kulaçoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-09-01

2.  Serum C-reactive protein level after ventral hernia repair with mesh reinforcement can predict infectious complications: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Pochhammer; B Scholtes; J Keuler; B Müssle; T Welsch; M Schäffer
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Lower reoperation rate for recurrence after mesh versus sutured elective repair in small umbilical and epigastric hernias. A nationwide register study.

Authors:  M W Christoffersen; F Helgstrand; J Rosenberg; H Kehlet; T Bisgaard
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  The Danish Ventral Hernia Database - a valuable tool for quality assessment and research.

Authors:  Frederik Helgstrand; Lars Nannestad Jorgensen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.790

5.  A systematic review on surgical treatment of primary epigastric hernias.

Authors:  L Blonk; Y A Civil; R Kaufmann; J C F Ket; S van der Velde
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  EHS and AHS guidelines for treatment of primary ventral hernias in rare locations or special circumstances.

Authors:  N A Henriksen; R Kaufmann; M P Simons; F Berrevoet; B East; J Fischer; W Hope; D Klassen; R Lorenz; Y Renard; M A Garcia Urena; A Montgomery
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-01-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.