Literature DB >> 23793721

Intensity-based hierarchical elastic registration using approximating splines.

Amira Serifovic-Trbalic1, Damir Demirovic, Philippe C Cattin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We introduce a new hierarchical approach for elastic medical image registration using approximating splines. In order to obtain the dense deformation field, we employ Gaussian elastic body splines (GEBS) that incorporate anisotropic landmark errors and rotation information. Since the GEBS approach is based on a physical model in form of analytical solutions of the Navier equation, it can very well cope with the local as well as global deformations present in the images by varying the standard deviation of the Gaussian forces.
METHODS: The proposed GEBS approximating model is integrated into the elastic hierarchical image registration framework, which decomposes a nonrigid registration problem into numerous local rigid transformations. The approximating GEBS registration scheme incorporates anisotropic landmark errors as well as rotation information. The anisotropic landmark localization uncertainties can be estimated directly from the image data, and in this case, they represent the minimal stochastic localization error, i.e., the Cramér-Rao bound. The rotation information of each landmark obtained from the hierarchical procedure is transposed in an additional angular landmark, doubling the number of landmarks in the GEBS model.
RESULTS: The modified hierarchical registration using the approximating GEBS model is applied to register 161 image pairs from a digital mammogram database. The obtained results are very encouraging, and the proposed approach significantly improved all registrations comparing the mean-square error in relation to approximating TPS with the rotation information. On artificially deformed breast images, the newly proposed method performed better than the state-of-the-art registration algorithm introduced by Rueckert et al. (IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712-721, 1999). The average error per breast tissue pixel was less than 2.23 pixels compared to 2.46 pixels for Rueckert's method.
CONCLUSION: The proposed hierarchical elastic image registration approach incorporates the GEBS approximation scheme extended with anisotropic landmark localization uncertainties as well as rotation information. Our experimental results show that the proposed scheme improved the registration result significantly.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793721     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-013-0906-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  7 in total

Review 1.  A survey of medical image registration.

Authors:  J B Maintz; M A Viergever
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice.

Authors:  W R Crum; T Hartkens; D L G Hill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Adaptive subdivision for hierarchical non-rigid registration of multi-modal images using mutual information.

Authors:  Adrian Andronache; Philippe Cattin; Gábor Székely
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Mechanics of the normal woman's breast.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Benny Dilmoney
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.285

6.  Intensity-based elastic registration incorporating anisotropic landmark errors and rotational information.

Authors:  A Serifović-Trbalić; D Demirović; N Prljaca; G Szekely; Philippe C Cattin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  A physics-based coordinate transformation for 3-D image matching.

Authors:  M H Davis; A Khotanzad; D P Flamig; S E Harms
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 10.048

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.