Literature DB >> 23793614

The influence on DNA damage of glycaemic parameters, oral antidiabetic drugs and polymorphisms of genes involved in the DNA repair system.

Bruna Santos da Silva1, Diego Luiz Rovaris, Rafaela Milan Bonotto, Jéssica Brasil Figueiredo Meyer, Ramona Elisa Grohe, Magda Susana Perassolo, Roberta de Passos Palazzo, Sharbel Weidner Maluf, Rafael Linden, Fabiana Michelsen de Andrade.   

Abstract

The hyperglycaemia seen in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) is associated with increased oxidative stress and production of reactive oxygen species, both of which are factors that can provoke DNA damage. Notwithstanding, other factors, including medications and individual susceptibility, can also induce this type of DNA lesion. The objective of this study was, therefore, to investigate the influence of glycaemic control, oral antidiabetic drugs (metformin and glibenclamide) and polymorphisms of the XRCC1 and XRCC3 genes on the frequency of DNA damage in DM2 patients, which was accessed by the cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome and the comet assays on the ex vivo mitogenically stimulated lymphocytes. The 53 people recruited to take part in the study were already on treatment with metformin and were followed for 5 months. Ten of these patients were put on combined treatment with the addition of glibenclamide. It was observed that the greater the plasma metformin concentration, the lower the frequency of micronuclei (MN) in the sample total (P = 0.009) and also that the subset of patients using combined treatment including glibenclamide had a significantly higher MN rate 90 days after starting combined treatment (P = 0.024). In the subset who only took metformin, the rate of MN was significantly higher among carriers of the 399Gln allele on the XRCC1 gene (P = 0.008). In addition, homozygotes for the 241Thr allele exhibited a significant increase in MN in the combined treatment group (P = 0.008). Our results suggest that different combinations of oral antidiabetic drugs and polymorphisms on genes involved in the DNA damage repair system could influence the frequency of this type of chromosome lesion, which can be a useful biomarker for assessing the risk of developing cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793614     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/get029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  4 in total

1.  Physical exercise and redox balance in type 2 diabetics: effects of moderate training on biomarkers of oxidative stress and DNA damage evaluated through comet assay.

Authors:  Monica Pittaluga; Antonio Sgadari; Ivan Dimauro; Barbara Tavazzi; Paolo Parisi; Daniela Caporossi
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 2.  Genome-Protecting Compounds as Potential Geroprotectors.

Authors:  Ekaterina Proshkina; Mikhail Shaposhnikov; Alexey Moskalev
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Vitamin B6 rescues insulin resistance and glucose-induced DNA damage caused by reduced activity of Drosophila PI3K.

Authors:  Elisa Mascolo; Francesco Liguori; Chiara Merigliano; Ludovica Schiano; Eleonora Gnocchini; Eleonora Pilesi; Cinzia Volonté; Martino L Di Salvo; Roberto Contestabile; Angela Tramonti; Fiammetta Vernì
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.513

4.  Increased Micronuclei Frequency in Oral and Lingual Epithelium of Treated Diabetes Mellitus Patients.

Authors:  Jesús Emilo Quintero Ojeda; Maribel Aguilar-Medina; Vicente Olimón-Andalón; Rosa Alicia García Jau; Alfredo Ayala Ham; José Geovanni Romero Quintana; Erika de Lourdes Silva-Benítez; Guzmán Sanchez-Schmitz; Rosalío Ramos-Payán
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.