Literature DB >> 23793491

Comparison of a SiO₂-CaO-ZnO-SrO glass polyalkenoate cement to commercial dental materials: ion release, biocompatibility and antibacterial properties.

A W Wren1, A Coughlan, M M Hall, M J German, M R Towler.   

Abstract

Ion Release and biocompatibility of a CaO-SrO-ZnO-SiO₂ (BT 101) based glass polyalkenoate cement (GPC) was compared against commercial GPCs, Fuji IX and Ketac Molar. The radiopacity (R) was similar for each material, 2.0-2.8. Ion release was evaluated on each material over 1, 7, 30 and 90 days. BT 101 release included Ca (23 mg/L), Sr (23 mg/L) Zn (13 mg/L), Si (203 mg/L). Fuji IX release includes Ca (0.7 mg/L), Al (3 mg/L) Si (26 mg/L), Na (60 mg/L) and P (0.5 mg/L) while Ketac Molar release includes Ca (1 mg/L), Al (0.6 mg/L) Si (23 mg/L), Na (76 mg/L) and P (0.7 mg/L). Simulated body fluid trials revealed CaP surface precipitation on BT 101. No evidence of precipitation was found on Fuji IX or Ketac Molar. Cytotoxicity testing found similar cell viability values for each material (~60 %, P = 1.000). Antibacterial testing determined a reduced CFU count with BT 101 (2.5 × 10³) when compared to the control bacteria (2.4 × 10⁴), Fuji IX (1.5 × 10⁴) and Ketac Molar (1.2 × 10⁴).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793491     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-4974-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  19 in total

Review 1.  A review of glass ionomer restorations in the primary dentition.

Authors:  S Y Cho; A C Cheng
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  Effects of variation in particle size on biaxial flexural strength of two conventional glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  A E Kaplan; J Williams; R W Billington; M Braden; G J Pearson
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 3.  The use of glass ionomer cements in both conventional and surgical endodontics.

Authors:  M A A De Bruyne; R J G De Moor
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.264

Review 4.  Development of glass-ionomer cement systems.

Authors:  D C Smith
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Aluminum toxicity perturbs long bone calcification in the embryonic chick.

Authors:  C E Firling; T A Hill; A R Severson
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Role of exchanged ions in the integration of ionomeric (glass polyalkenoate) bone substitutes.

Authors:  D H Carter; P Sloan; I M Brook; P V Hatton
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Strontium ranelate: a novel mode of action optimizing bone formation and resorption.

Authors:  P J Marie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Solutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W.

Authors:  T Kokubo; H Kushitani; S Sakka; T Kitsugi; T Yamamuro
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1990-06

9.  Evaluation of two novel aluminum-free, zinc-based glass polyalkenoate cements as alternatives to PMMA bone cement for use in vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis; Mark R Towler; Daniel Boyd; Matthew J German; Anthony W Wren; Owen M Clarkin; Andrew Yates
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Influence of alkali metal ions on the fracture properties of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements.

Authors:  E De Barra; R G Hill
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  1 in total

1.  Protective Effects of GIC and S-PRG Filler Restoratives on Demineralization of Bovine Enamel in Lactic Acid Solution.

Authors:  Naoyuki Kaga; Futami Nagano-Takebe; Takashi Nezu; Takashi Matsuura; Kazuhiko Endo; Masayuki Kaga
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.