Literature DB >> 23793486

Feasibility and acceptability of alternate methods of postnatal data collection.

Lacey A McCormack1, Christa Friedrich, Nancy Fahrenwald, Bonny Specker.   

Abstract

This study was done in preparation for the launch of the National Children's Study (NCS) main study. The goal of this study was to examine the feasibility (completion rates and completeness of data), acceptability, staff time and cost-effectiveness of three methods of data collection for the postnatal 3- and 9-month questionnaires completed as part of NCS protocol. Eligible NCS participants who were scheduled to complete a postnatal questionnaire at three and nine months were randomly assigned to receive either: (a) telephone data collection (b) web-based data collection, or (c) self-administered (mailed) questionnaires. Event completion rates and satisfaction across the three data collection methods were compared and the influence of socio-demographic factors on completion rates and satisfaction rates was examined. Cost data were compared to data for completion and satisfaction for each of the delivery methods. Completion rates and satisfaction did not differ significantly by method, but completeness of data did, with odds of data completeness higher among web than phone (p < 0.001) or mail (p < 0.001). Costs were highest for the phone, followed by mail and web methods (p < 0.001). No significant differences in participant time (i.e. burden) across the three data collection methods were seen. Mail and phone data collection were the least complete of the three methods and were the most expensive. Mailed data collection was neither complete nor exceptionally economical. Web-based data collection was the least costly and provided the most complete data. Participants without web access could complete the questionnaire over the phone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23793486      PMCID: PMC8238418          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-013-1310-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  11 in total

1.  Differences in responses to Web and paper surveys among school professionals.

Authors:  Georgette Yetter; Kristen Capaccioli
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-02

2.  Alternative modes for health surveillance surveys: an experiment with web, mail, and telephone.

Authors:  Michael W Link; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Comparison of Web and mail surveys for studying secondary consequences associated with substance use: evidence for minimal mode effects.

Authors:  Sean Esteban McCabe; Mick P Couper; James A Cranford; Carol J Boyd
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: a comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches.

Authors:  Michael W Link; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-03

Review 5.  Participation rates in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Sandro Galea; Melissa Tracy
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Mail versus internet surveys: determinants of method of response preferences among health professionals.

Authors:  Christine Lusk; George L Delclos; Keith Burau; Derek D Drawhorn; Lu Ann Aday
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Telephone and web: mixed-mode challenge.

Authors:  Jessica Greene; Howard Speizer; Wyndy Wiitala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches.

Authors:  Martha Sinclair; Joanne O'Toole; Manori Malawaraarachchi; Karin Leder
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison.

Authors:  Philip Ritter; Kate Lorig; Diana Laurent; Katy Matthews
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Reliability of internet- versus telephone-administered questionnaires in a diverse sample of smokers.

Authors:  Amanda L Graham; George D Papandonatos
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Cauane Blumenberg; Aluísio J D Barros
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 2.  Learning from COVID-19 related trial adaptations to inform efficient trial design-a sequential mixed methods study.

Authors:  Robin Chatters; Cindy L Cooper; Alicia O'Cathain; Caroline Murphy; Athene Lane; Katie Sutherland; Christopher Burton; Angela Cape; Louis Tunnicliffe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.612

3.  Feasibility of using a multilingual web survey in studying the health of ethnic minority youth.

Authors:  Jaana Maarit Kinnunen; Maili Malin; Susanna Ulrika Raisamo; Pirjo Liisa Lindfors; Lasse Antero Pere; Arja Hannele Rimpelä
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-05-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.