Literature DB >> 23793481

Exploring U.S. men's birth intentions.

Laura Duberstein Lindberg1, Kathryn Kost.   

Abstract

While recently there have been renewed interest in women's childbearing intentions, the authors sought to bring needed research attention to understanding men's childbearing intentions. Nationally representative data from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) was used to examine pregnancy intentions and happiness for all births reported by men in the 5 years preceding the interview. We used bivariate statistical tests of associations between intention status, happiness about the pregnancy, and fathers' demographic characteristics, including joint race/ethnicity and union status subgroups. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios of a birth being intended, estimated separately by father's union status at birth. Using comparable data and measures from the male and female NSFG surveys, we tested for gender differences intentions and happiness, and examined the sensitivity of our results to potential underreporting of births by men. Nearly four out of ten of births to men were reported as unintended, with significant variation by men's demographic traits. Non-marital childbearing was more likely to be intended among Hispanic and black men. Sixty-two percent of births received a 10 on the happiness scale. Happiness about the pregnancy varied significantly by intention status. Men were significantly happier than women about the pregnancies, with no significant difference in intention status. Potential underreporting of births by men had little impact on these patterns. This study brings needed focus to men's childbearing intentions and improves our understanding of the context of their role as fathers. Men need to be included in strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23793481      PMCID: PMC3844082          DOI: 10.1007/s10995-013-1286-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  22 in total

1.  Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness.

Authors:  J B Stanford; R Hobbs; P Jameson; M J DeWitt; R C Fischer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

2.  The intendedness of pregnancy: a concept in transition.

Authors:  L V Klerman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

3.  Fertility, family planning, and women's health: new data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  J C Abma; A Chandra; W D Mosher; L S Peterson; L J Piccinino
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  1997-05

4.  Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States.

Authors:  John S Santelli; Laura Duberstein Lindberg; Mark G Orr; Lawrence B Finer; Ilene Speizer
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2009-06

5.  Pregnant women's perspectives on intendedness of pregnancy.

Authors:  M K Moos; R Petersen; K Meadows; C L Melvin; A M Spitz
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

6.  Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: data on men and women from cycle 6 (2002) of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Gladys M Martinez; Anjani Chandra; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones; William D Mosher
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2006-05

7.  Unintended pregnancy and depressive symptoms among first-time mothers and fathers.

Authors:  S J Leathers; M A Kelley
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  2000-10

8.  Changing patterns of nonmarital childbearing in the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie J Ventura
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2009-05

9.  Consequences for infants of parental disagreement in pregnancy intention.

Authors:  Sanders Korenman; Robert Kaestner; Ted Joyce
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

10.  The link between couples' pregnancy intentions and behavior: does it matter who is asked?

Authors:  Maureen R Waller; Marianne P Bitler
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2008-12
View more
  19 in total

1.  Dual method use at last sexual encounter: a nationally representative, episode-level analysis of US men and women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Nicole K Smith; Stephanie A Sanders; Vanessa Schick; Debby Herbenick; Michael Reece; Brian Dodge; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Fertility Intentions and Perspectives on Contraceptive Involvement Among Low-Income Men Aged 25 to 55.

Authors:  Anthony D Campbell; David K Turok; Kari White
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-08-26

3.  Male experiences of unintended pregnancy: characteristics and prevalence.

Authors:  Anna Kågesten; Nathalie Bajos; Aline Bohet; Caroline Moreau
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Similarities and differences in contraceptive use reported by women and men in the National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Abigail Ra Aiken; Yu Wang; Jenny Higgins; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Methodological Considerations in Couples' Fertility Intentions: Missing Men and the Viability of Women's Proxy Reports.

Authors:  J Bart Stykes
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-08

6.  Planned, unplanned and in-between: the meaning and context of pregnancy planning for young people.

Authors:  Stephanie Arteaga; Lauren Caton; Anu Manchikanti Gomez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Parents' experience of unintended childbearing: A qualitative study of factors that mitigate or exacerbate effects.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Kathryn Kost; Lori Frohwirth; Isaac Maddow-Zimet; Vivian Gor
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  Male Contraception: Research, New Methods, and Implications for Marginalized Populations.

Authors:  Olivia Plana
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-07-23

9.  Changes in expectation of relationship permanence, pregnancy acceptability and desire, and contraceptive use over time among young Latino/a women and men: An exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Jennet Arcara; Stephanie Arteaga; Ilhaam Burny; Anu Manchikanti Gómez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Pathways to Parenthood in Social and Family Context: Decade in Review, 2020.

Authors:  Karen Benjamin Guzzo; Sarah R Hayford
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2020-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.