Literature DB >> 23793406

Trial quality checklists: on the need to multiply (not add) scores.

Kaitlin E Palys, Vance W Berger, Sunny Alperson.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23793406     DOI： 10.1007/s00784-013-1020-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN： 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Is the Jadad score the proper evaluation of trials?

Authors:  Vance W Berger
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.666

2.  A note on the jadad score as an efficient tool for measuring trial quality.

Authors:  Kaitlin E Palys; Vance W Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial.

Authors:  T C Chalmers; H Smith; B Blackburn; B Silverman; B Schroeder; D Reitman; A Ambroz
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1981-05

Review 4.  A general framework for the evaluation of clinical trial quality.

Authors:  Vance W Berger; Sunny Y Alperson
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2009-05

Review 5.  Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales.

Authors:  Bart Craane; Pieter Ubele Dijkstra; Karel Stappaerts; Antoon De Laat
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.573
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.