Literature DB >> 23793219

Scanning electron microscopy of acantholysis in pemphigus foliaceus.

Hiram Larangeira de Almeida1, Aline Hatzenberger Leitão, Gabriela Rossi, Nara Moreira Rocha, Ricardo Marques e Silva.   

Abstract

We performed scanning electron microscopy of an inverted blister roof in a case of pemphigus foliaceus. The loss of intercellular adherence could be easily seen with low magnification. The acantholytic keratinocytes displayed an irregular and sometimes polygonal contour. Round cells, typically seen in light microscopy, were also observed. The examination of a blister roof allows ultrastructural documentation of the acantholytic changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793219      PMCID: PMC3754385          DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20132047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  An Bras Dermatol        ISSN: 0365-0596            Impact factor:   1.896


INTRODUCTION

The pemphigus group is a well characterized subset of blistering diseases due to IgG autoantibodies against the desmosomal cadherins, desmoglein 3 and desmoglein,[1] leading to acantholysis, the histological hallmark of pemphigus.[1-3] Acantholysis allows differentiation with the bullous pemphigoid (BP) group, in which the whole epidermis is lost without acantholytic changes. In order to examine these changes, we performed scanning electron microscopy of an inverted blister roof of a case of pemphigus foliaceus, which was diagnosed with light microscopy and direct immunofluorescence. The first found acantholysis in the upper epidermal layers and the second identified IgG deposition with an intercellular pattern. For comparison, the blister roof of a case of BP was also examined.

RESULTS

With low magnification the loss of intercellular adherence could be easily seen (Figure 1A). The acantholytic keratinocytes showed an irregular sometimes polygonal contour. Round cells, as typically seen in light microscopy, were also observed. These round cells had a central concavity (Figure 1B).
FIGURE 1

A. low magnification (x1.000) with loose keratinocytes. B. Detail of a typical round acantholytic keratinocyte (x 4.500)

A. low magnification (x1.000) with loose keratinocytes. B. Detail of a typical round acantholytic keratinocyte (x 4.500) In the inner surface of the blister roof the adherence loss among keratinocytes could be documented, while some cells had a stretched membrane with some persistent adherence to adjacent keratinocytes (Figures 2 and 3). With very high magnification we observed the rupture of epidermal intercellular connections (Figure 4).
FIGURE 2

A. Acantholytic area (x2.000) with loose keratinocytes. B. Detail of the adhesion loss (x 6.000)

FIGURE 3

A. Acantholytic area with a round keratinocyte (x2.400) B. Detail of the adhesion loss(x10.000)

FIGURE 4

Very high magnifications (x10.000 and 12.000) B - with intercelular separation

A. Acantholytic area (x2.000) with loose keratinocytes. B. Detail of the adhesion loss (x 6.000) A. Acantholytic area with a round keratinocyte (x2.400) B. Detail of the adhesion loss(x10.000) Very high magnifications (x10.000 and 12.000) B - with intercelular separation The blister roof of a BP case shows a "solid" cell membrane, with a regular surface, without isolated cells.

DISCUSSION

Most papers with electron microscopy findings for pemphigus were published in the 1960s, when its pathogenic aspects were not completely understood.[4,5] Technological advances now provide an easier and more accurate examination with the new electron microscopes. Two papers reporting on the use of transmission electron microscopy appeared recently in the scientific literature in English,[4,5] reporting the loss of adherence with widening of the intercellular spaces. Stretched desmosomes with persistence of some intercellular adherence were also found, similar to our results with SEM, which documented three-dimensionally the acantholytic phenomena observed in pemphigus foliaceus (Figures 2 and 3).[4] Under SEM acantholytic keratinocytes are polygonal or round or may have an irregular border. The loss of adherence to the adjacent cells could be easily observed. These changes were not found in a blister's roof of BP examined under the same conditions. Published SEM findings in scraps of oral mucosa in pemphigus vulgaris described also various cell shapes, as well as a central bulging or concavity in acantholytic keratinocytes, which we also found.[6] The examination of a blister roof, which is free of artifacts and bacterial contamination, allows a better documentation of these changes.
  5 in total

1.  Desmosome splitting is a primary ultrastructural change in the acantholysis of pemphigus.

Authors:  Wenqing Wang; Masayuki Amagai; Akira Ishiko
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.563

2.  The ultrastructure of acantholysis in pemphigus vulgaris.

Authors:  G F H Diercks; H H Pas; M F Jonkman
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Pemphigus foliaceus IgG causes dissociation of desmoglein 1-containing junctions without blocking desmoglein 1 transinteraction.

Authors:  Jens Waschke; Paola Bruggeman; Werner Baumgartner; Detlef Zillikens; Detlev Drenckhahn
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Acantholytic cells in pemphigus. A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study.

Authors:  J Hietanen
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 5.  The desmosome and pemphigus.

Authors:  Jens Waschke
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 4.304

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Scanning electron microscopy of a blister roof in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

Authors:  Hiram Larangeira de Almeida; Luciane Monteiro; Ricardo Marques e Silva; Nara Moreira Rocha; Hans Scheffer
Journal:  An Bras Dermatol       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.896

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.