Literature DB >> 23793041

Using expired air carbon monoxide to determine smoking status during pregnancy: preliminary identification of an appropriately sensitive and specific cut-point.

Beth A Bailey1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measurement of carbon monoxide in expired air samples (ECO) is a non-invasive, cost-effective biochemical marker for smoking. Cut points of 6ppm-10ppm have been established, though appropriate cut-points for pregnant woman have been debated due to metabolic changes. This study assessed whether an ECO cut-point identifying at least 90% of pregnant smokers, and misidentifying fewer than 10% of non-smokers, could be established.
METHODS: Pregnant women (N=167) completed a validated self-report smoking assessment, a urine drug screen for cotinine (UDS), and provided an expired air sample twice during pregnancy.
RESULTS: Half of women reported non-smoking status early (51%) and late (53%) in pregnancy, confirmed by UDS. Using a traditional 8ppm+cut-point for the early pregnancy reading, only 1% of non-smokers were incorrectly identified as smokers, but only 56% of all smokers, and 67% who smoked 5+ cigarettes in the previous 24h, were identified. However, at 4ppm+, only 8% of non-smokers were misclassified as smokers, and 90% of all smokers and 96% who smoked 5+ cigarettes in the previous 24h were identified. False positives were explained by heavy second hand smoke exposure and marijuana use. Results were similar for late pregnancy ECO, with ROC analysis revealing an area under the curve of .95 for early pregnancy, and .94 for late pregnancy readings.
CONCLUSIONS: A lower 4ppm ECO cut-point may be necessary to identify pregnant smokers using expired air samples, and this cut-point appears valid throughout pregnancy. Work is ongoing to validate findings in larger samples, but it appears if an appropriate cut-point is used, ECO is a valid method for determining smoking status in pregnancy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical verification of smoking; CO; COHb; ECO; ETS; Exhaled air carbon monoxide; NPV; PPV; Pregnancy smoking; ROC; Smoking assessment; UDS; carbon monoxide; carboxyhaemoglobin; environmental tobacco exposure; expired carbon monoxide; negative predictive value; parts per million; positive predictive value; ppm; receiver operating characteristic; urine drug screen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23793041     DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  10 in total

1.  Bupropion sustained release for pregnant smokers: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Tatiana N Nanovskaya; Cheryl Oncken; Valentina M Fokina; Richard S Feinn; Shannon M Clark; Holly West; Sunil K Jain; Mahmoud S Ahmed; Gary D V Hankins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Biochemical Verification of Tobacco Use and Abstinence: 2019 Update.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; John T Bernert; Jonathan Foulds; Stephen S Hecht; Peyton Jacob; Martin J Jarvis; Anne Joseph; Cheryl Oncken; Megan E Piper
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Comparing Smoking Topography and Subjective Measures of Usual Brand Cigarettes Between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Smokers.

Authors:  Cecilia L Bergeria; Sarah H Heil; Janice Y Bunn; Stacey C Sigmon; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Smartphone-based financial incentives to promote smoking cessation during pregnancy: A pilot study.

Authors:  Allison N Kurti; Katherine Tang; Hypatia A Bolivar; Carolyn Evemy; Norman Medina; Joan Skelly; Tyler Nighbor; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Evaluation of a complex healthcare intervention to increase smoking cessation in pregnant women: interrupted time series analysis with economic evaluation.

Authors:  Ruth Bell; Svetlana V Glinianaia; Zelda van der Waal; Andrew Close; Eoin Moloney; Susan Jones; Vera Araújo-Soares; Sharon Hamilton; Eugene Mg Milne; Janet Shucksmith; Luke Vale; Martyn Willmore; Martin White; Steven Rushton
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial of a smoking cessation counselling training programme for midwives treating women with functional health illiteracy and low socioeconomic status (PROMISE): a study protocol.

Authors:  Jeroen Bommelé; Linda Springvloet; Naïma Abouri; Karianne Djoyoadhiningrat-Hol; Margriet van Laar; Matthijs Blankers
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Evaluation of the MoMba Live Long Remote Smoking Detection System During and After Pregnancy: Development and Usability Study.

Authors:  Stephanie Valencia; Laura Callinan; Frederick Shic; Megan Smith
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Fetal growth restriction, low birth weight, and preterm birth: Effects of active or passive smoking evaluated by maternal expired CO at delivery, impacts of cessation at different trimesters.

Authors:  Conchita Delcroix-Gomez; Michel-Henri Delcroix; Amal Jamee; Tristan Gauthier; Pierre Marquet; Yves Aubard
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 5.163

9.  [Do COPD patients lie about their smoking habit?]

Authors:  Virginia Almadana Pacheco; Cristina Benito Bernáldez; Estefanía Luque Crespo; Rafael Perera Louvier; Julio César Rodríguez Fernández; Agustín S Valido Morales
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 1.137

10.  Financial Incentives for Preventing Postpartum return to Smoking (FIPPS): study protocol for a three-arm randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Ussher; C Best; S Lewis; J McKell; T Coleman; S Cooper; S Orton; L Bauld
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.