Literature DB >> 23792973

Exposure to inhalable dust and endotoxin among Danish pig farmers affected by work tasks and stable characteristics.

Ioannis Basinas1, Vivi Schlünssen, Hisamitsu Takai, Dick Heederik, Øyvind Omland, Inge M Wouters, Torben Sigsgaard, Hans Kromhout.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify working tasks and stable characteristics that determine intensity and variability of personal exposure to dust and endotoxin among pig farmers.
METHODS: Three hundred fifty-four personal full-shift measurements were performed in 231 farmers employed in 53 Danish pig farms. Filters were gravimetrically analysed for inhalable dust and for endotoxin by the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay. Information on working tasks and stable characteristics were collected using self-reported activity diaries and walk-through surveys performed in conjunction with the measurements. Associations between log-transformed dust and endotoxin exposure and working tasks and stable characteristics were examined using linear mixed-effects analysis. In these models, worker and farm identity were treated as random effects and working tasks and stable characteristics as fixed effects. Both separate and combined models for tasks and stable characteristics were elaborated.
RESULTS: Inhalable dust concentrations ranged between 0.1 and 48 mg m(-3) and endotoxin concentrations varied between 9.2 and 370,000 EU m(-3). Field work activities played a dominant role on the exposure variability. Indoor working tasks with intense animal activity or handling of feed materials increased exposure concentrations, whereas engagement in field work was associated with lower exposure concentrations. High-pressure water cleaning increased endotoxin exposure but did not affect exposure to inhalable dust. Stable characteristics related to feeding practices and type of ventilation were determinants of exposure to inhalable dust. For endotoxin, the most important determinants were use of dry feed and slatted floor coverage. Feeding practices solely explained all between-farms variability in exposure to inhalable dust and endotoxin.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest feeding systems, flooring and ventilation to be potential areas where improved methods can reduce exposure to dust and endotoxin among pig farmers. Further, they highlight particular tasks involving feeding and intense animal handling as sources of very high levels of exposure. The pig farming industry is encouraged to focus on exposure reduction. Use of respirators during performance of working tasks where levels of exposure are particularly high ought to be considered until adequate hygienic solutions have been established.

Entities:  

Keywords:  determinants of exposure; dust; endotoxin; pig farmers; variability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23792973     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/met029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  12 in total

1.  Farm animal models of organic dust exposure and toxicity: insights and implications for respiratory health.

Authors:  Chakia J McClendon; Carresse L Gerald; Jenora T Waterman
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-04

2.  Performance of prototype high-flow inhalable dust sampler in a livestock production facility.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Changjie Cai; John Mehaffy; Darrah Sleeth; John Volckens
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Characterization of inhalable endotoxin, glucan, and dust exposures in Iowa farmers.

Authors:  Jean-François Sauvé; Sarah J Locke; Pabitra R Josse; Emma M Stapleton; Nervana Metwali; Ralph W Altmaier; Gabriella Andreotti; Peter S Thorne; Jonathan N Hofmann; Laura E Beane Freeman; Melissa C Friesen
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 5.840

4.  Industrial hog farming is associated with altered circulating immunological markers.

Authors:  Jonathan N Hofmann; Meredith S Shiels; Melissa C Friesen; Troy J Kemp; Anil K Chaturvedi; Charles F Lynch; Christine G Parks; Ligia A Pinto; Allan Hildesheim; Michael C R Alavanja; Laura E Beane Freeman
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Use of Recirculating Ventilation With Dust Filtration to Improve Wintertime Air Quality in a Swine Farrowing Room.

Authors:  T Renée Anthony; Ralph Altmaier; Samuel Jones; Rich Gassman; Jae Hong Park; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 6.  Linking Environmental Exposures to Molecular Pathogenesis in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes.

Authors:  Leah Moubadder; Lauren E McCullough; Christopher R Flowers; Jean L Koff
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Self-reported work activities, eye, nose, and throat symptoms, and respiratory health outcomes among an industrial hog operation worker cohort, North Carolina, USA.

Authors:  Vanessa R Coffman; Devon J Hall; Nora Pisanic; David C Love; Maya Nadimpalli; Meredith McCormack; Marie Diener-West; Meghan F Davis; Christopher D Heaney
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 8.  Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I-Dust.

Authors:  Bruce David; Randi Oppermann Moe; Virginie Michel; Vonne Lund; Cecilie Mejdell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Human-livestock contacts and their relationship to transmission of zoonotic pathogens, a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Gijs Klous; Anke Huss; Dick J J Heederik; Roel A Coutinho
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2016-04-06

10.  Airborne MRSA and Total Staphylococcus aureus as Associated With Particles of Different Sizes on Pig Farms.

Authors:  Anne Mette Madsen; Iman Kurdi; Louise Feld; Kira Tendal
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.