Literature DB >> 23792217

Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study.

Robert J Barry1, Frances M De Blasio.   

Abstract

The unwarned auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task provides a convenient means to assess differential processing, although our interpretations remain limited by the lack of research regarding the range of elicited components and their functional significance. We examined sequential processing in this paradigm, presenting 24 participants with a total of 300 trials in two blocks. EEG was recorded from 19 channels, and the Go and NoGo event-related potentials were decomposed using temporal Principal Components Analysis. Of the 218 unrestricted Varimax-rotated factors, seven were identifiable as components based on their latency, polarity, and topography: early N1, Processing Negativity (PN), and P2 components were followed by N2, P3, the classic Slow Wave (SW), and a diffuse Late Positivity (LP). N1 was enhanced to Go, as was the defining temporal topography of PN. NoGo produced increased centroparietal P2, frontocentral N2, and P3a, in comparison to Go, which produced a more parietal N2 and P3b, and an enhanced SW. The LP was larger in NoGo. These results suggest that N1 marks the beginning of Go and NoGo differentiation. Complete Go/NoGo categorisation is marked by N2; this is followed by different processing chains leading to the NoGo non-response (marked by P3a) and Go response (marked by P3b and SW). The larger LP in NoGo marks the cortical inactivation following the earlier cessation of processing in this condition.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERPs; Equiprobable Go/NoGo paradigm; Principal Components Analysis (PCA)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23792217     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  9 in total

1.  Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.

Authors:  Sigita Melynyte; Osvaldas Ruksenas; Inga Griskova-Bulanova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Issues and considerations for using the scalp surface Laplacian in EEG/ERP research: A tutorial review.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Chronic academic stress facilitates response inhibition: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Heming Gao; Xiaoman Wang; Mengjiao Huang; Mingming Qi
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.526

4.  Go and NoGo: modulation of electrophysiological correlates by female sex steroid hormones.

Authors:  Inga Griskova-Bulanova; Ramune Griksiene; Aleksandras Voicikas; Osvaldas Ruksenas
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Caffeine Effects on ERP Components and Performance in an Equiprobable Auditory Go/NoGo Task.

Authors:  Robert J Barry; Frances M De Blasio; Adele E Cave
Journal:  J Caffeine Res       Date:  2014-09-01

6.  The First 250 ms of Auditory Processing: No Evidence of Early Processing Negativity in the Go/NoGo Task.

Authors:  Jack S Fogarty; Robert J Barry; Genevieve Z Steiner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of Cerebellar tDCS on Inhibitory Control: Evidence from a Go/NoGo Task.

Authors:  Daniela Mannarelli; Caterina Pauletti; Alessia Petritis; Roberto Delle Chiaie; Antonio Currà; Carlo Trompetto; Francesco Fattapposta
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Sequential Processing and the Matching-Stimulus Interval Effect in ERP Components: An Exploration of the Mechanism Using Multiple Regression.

Authors:  Genevieve Z Steiner; Robert J Barry; Craig J Gonsalvez
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Individual differences of conflict monitoring and feedback processing during reinforcement learning in a mock forensic context.

Authors:  Anja Leue; Katharina Nieden; Vera Scheuble; André Beauducel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.