Literature DB >> 2379158

Determinants of the antitumor effect of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies.

S J Knox1, R Levy, R A Miller, W Uhland, J Schiele, W Ruehl, R Finston, P Day-Lollini, M L Goris.   

Abstract

The murine B-cell lymphoma 38C13 model was used to study the radiobiological effect of 131I-monoclonal antibody (MAB) therapy compared with dose equivalent external beam irradiation. Continuous exponentially decreasing low dose rate (LDR) gamma-irradiation, and multiply fractionated (MF) X-irradiation were compared with dose equivalent 131I-MAB. The relative therapeutic efficacy of radioimmunotherapy, and the relative contribution of (a) low dose rate; (b) whole body irradiation; and (c) microdosimetry to the overall effect were determined. Groups of mice with or without B-cell lymphoma were treated with either (a) 131I-anti-idiotype MAB; (b) 131I-isotype-matched irrelevant control MAB; (c) 5-15 Gy 250 kV X-irradiation given as a single fraction; (d) 2.5-30 Gy 250 kV X-irradiation given in 10 fractions/2 weeks; or by (e) continuous exponentially decreasing gamma-irradiation via a 137Cs source, which simulated the effective t1/2 of the 131I-MAB. In tumor-free mice the LD50/30 was approximately 10 Gy for MF and LDR external irradiation, and 11-12 Gy for 131I-MAB. However, the effect of these modes of irradiation on tumor size differed significantly. The cumulative percentage of tumor reduction averaged over 12 days was 0.635 +/- 0.055%/Gy for MF, and 1.36 +/- 0.061%/Gy for LDR external irradiation (a relative efficacy factor of 1.63 for LDR irradiation; P = 0.01). Assuming homogeneous body distribution, the tumor reduction effect over 12 days for 131I-MAB was 2.064 +/- 0.133%/Gy for specific, and 1.742 +/- 0.1%/Gy for nonspecific isotype-matched irrelevant 131I-MAB (P = 0.02). When 131I-MAB was compared to LDR external irradiation, the relative efficacy factor was 1.99 (P less than 0.001). In summary, there was a dose rate effect on tumor response, which may in part explain the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy. The additional effect of 131I-MAB on tumor response was only partially explained by the cumulative concentration ratio of 131I-MAB tumor/131I-MAB whole body, which was on average 1.7. This relatively low concentration ratio was partly due to tumor-mediated dehalogenation. Thus, the overall tumor response was a function of the total dose, dose rate, and both the specific and nonspecific distribution of 131I-MAB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2379158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  6 in total

1.  131I-anti-CD45 antibody plus busulfan and cyclophosphamide before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission.

Authors:  John M Pagel; Frederick R Appelbaum; Janet F Eary; Joseph Rajendran; Darrell R Fisher; Ted Gooley; Katherine Ruffner; Eneida Nemecek; Eileen Sickle; Larry Durack; Jeanette Carreras; Mary M Horowitz; Oliver W Press; Ajay K Gopal; Paul J Martin; Irwin D Bernstein; Dana C Matthews
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  131I-Tositumomab (Bexxar) vs. 90Y-Ibritumomab (Zevalin) therapy of low-grade refractory/relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Andrei Iagaru; Erik S Mittra; Kristen Ganjoo; Susan J Knox; Michael L Goris
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  The Radiobiology of Radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Zachary S Morris; Andrew Z Wang; Susan J Knox
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 5.934

4.  Dose calculations for [(131)i] meta-iodobenzylguanidine-induced bystander effects.

Authors:  M D Gow; C B Seymour; M Boyd; R J Mairs; W V Prestiwch; C E Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Radio-enhancement effects by radiolabeled nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yaser Hadi Gholami; Richard Maschmeyer; Zdenka Kuncic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  A perspective on the radiopharmaceutical requirements for imaging and therapy of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Julie Bolcaen; Janke Kleynhans; Shankari Nair; Jeroen Verhoeven; Ingeborg Goethals; Mike Sathekge; Charlot Vandevoorde; Thomas Ebenhan
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 11.556

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.