Literature DB >> 23791487

Views on contentious practices in dairy farming: the case of early cow-calf separation.

B A Ventura1, M A G von Keyserlingk, C A Schuppli, D M Weary.   

Abstract

The public has become increasingly interested in the welfare of food animals, but the food animal industries possess few mechanisms for public engagement. Here we present results from a web-based forum designed to allow stakeholders to share views on controversial issues in dairying. In response to the question "Should dairy calves be separated from the cow within the first few hours after birth?" participants were able to indicate "yes," "no," or "neutral" and either write a reason in support of their view or select reasons provided by other participants. Four independent groups of participants were recruited (a total of 163 people); 31% said they had no involvement in the dairy industry; the remaining 69% (with some involvement in the industry) were students or teachers (33%), animal advocates (13%), producers (11%), veterinarians (9%) and other dairy industry professionals (3%). Overall, little consensus existed among participants across groups; 44% chose "yes," 48% "no," and 9% "neutral." Responses varied with demographics, with opposition to early separation higher among females, animal advocates, and those with no involvement with the dairy industry. A fifth group was recruited at a dairy industry conference (an additional 28 participants); 46% chose "yes," 32% "no," and 21% "neutral." Across all 5 groups, opponents and supporters often referenced similar issues in the reasons they provided. Opponents of early separation contended that it is emotionally stressful for the calf and cow, it compromises calf and cow health, it is unnatural, and the industry can and should accommodate cow-calf pairs. In contrast, supporters of early separation reasoned that emotional distress is minimized by separating before bonds develop, that it promotes calf and cow health, and that the industry is limited in its ability to accommodate cow-calf pairs. These results illustrate the potential of web-based forums to identify areas of agreement and conflict among stakeholders, providing a basis for the development of practices that address shared concerns.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; maternal filial bond; producer attitude; public engagement

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23791487     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  21 in total

1.  Moral Reasons for Individuals in High-Income Countries to Limit Beef Consumption.

Authors:  Anne Barnhill; Justin Bernstein; Ruth Faden; Rebecca McLaren; Travis N Rieder; Jessica Fanzo
Journal:  Food Ethics       Date:  2022-06-17

2.  Effects of Degree and Timing of Social Housing on Reversal Learning and Response to Novel Objects in Dairy Calves.

Authors:  Rebecca K Meagher; Rolnei R Daros; João H C Costa; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Maria J Hötzel; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A survey of management practices that influence performance and welfare of dairy calves reared in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Maria J Hötzel; Cibele Longo; Lucas F Balcão; Clarissa S Cardoso; João H C Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  What Difference Does a Visit Make? Changes in Animal Welfare Perceptions after Interested Citizens Tour a Dairy Farm.

Authors:  Beth Ann Ventura; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Hannah Wittman; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Online Chats to Assess Stakeholder Perceptions of Meat Chicken Intensification and Welfare.

Authors:  Tiffani J Howell; Vanessa I Rohlf; Grahame J Coleman; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Brazilian Citizens: Expectations Regarding Dairy Cattle Welfare and Awareness of Contentious Practices.

Authors:  Clarissa S Cardoso; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Maria José Hötzel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Public opinion towards castration without anaesthesia and lack of access to pasture in beef cattle production.

Authors:  Dayane Lemos Teixeira; Rafael Larraín; Oscar Melo; María José Hötzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  American and German attitudes towards cow-calf separation on dairy farms.

Authors:  Gesa Busch; Daniel M Weary; Achim Spiller; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mutilating Procedures, Management Practices, and Housing Conditions That May Affect the Welfare of Farm Animals: Implications for Welfare Research.

Authors:  Rebecca E Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay; Frank J C M van Eerdenburg; Francisca C Velkers; Lisa Fijn; Saskia S Arndt
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Public Attitudes to Housing Systems for Pregnant Pigs.

Authors:  E B Ryan; D Fraser; D M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.