BACKGROUND: Scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is a chronic, progressive condition that is characterized by a restrictive ventilator defect. Cyclophosphamide (CYC), with or without glucocorticoid, effectively alters the course of SSc-ILD. However, the effect of glucocorticoid monotherapy remains unclear. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with SSc-ILD were classified into 2 groups: 21 in the treatment group (glucocorticoid monotherapy [n=14] or immunosuppressive agents [n=7]) and 50 in the non-treatment group. Their backgrounds and prognoses were analyzed retrospectively. We also classified these patients into survival (n=55) and non-survival (n=16) groups to assess prognostic factors. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 9.8 years. The treatment group had a greater proportion of patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis or respiratory symptoms than the non-treatment group. The treatment group's annual change in forced vital capacity (FVC) compared to baseline, which was 170.4mL (157.8mL for the glucocorticoid monotherapy subgroup and 191.3mL for the immunosuppressive agent subgroup), was better than that of the non-treatment group, -60.8mL (p<0.01). Still, in terms of 5- and 10-year survival, there was no statistically significant difference between these groups. No incidence of SSc renal crisis was reported in the treatment group. The non-survival group included more patients with pulmonary hypertension than the survival group, but multivariate analysis showed no other statistically significantly difference between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to CYC, glucocorticoid alone improved pulmonary function of Japanese SSc-ILD patients, suggesting that this monotherapy is a good alternative when CYC is contraindicated.
BACKGROUND:Scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is a chronic, progressive condition that is characterized by a restrictive ventilator defect. Cyclophosphamide (CYC), with or without glucocorticoid, effectively alters the course of SSc-ILD. However, the effect of glucocorticoid monotherapy remains unclear. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with SSc-ILD were classified into 2 groups: 21 in the treatment group (glucocorticoid monotherapy [n=14] or immunosuppressive agents [n=7]) and 50 in the non-treatment group. Their backgrounds and prognoses were analyzed retrospectively. We also classified these patients into survival (n=55) and non-survival (n=16) groups to assess prognostic factors. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 9.8 years. The treatment group had a greater proportion of patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis or respiratory symptoms than the non-treatment group. The treatment group's annual change in forced vital capacity (FVC) compared to baseline, which was 170.4mL (157.8mL for the glucocorticoid monotherapy subgroup and 191.3mL for the immunosuppressive agent subgroup), was better than that of the non-treatment group, -60.8mL (p<0.01). Still, in terms of 5- and 10-year survival, there was no statistically significant difference between these groups. No incidence of SSc renal crisis was reported in the treatment group. The non-survival group included more patients with pulmonary hypertension than the survival group, but multivariate analysis showed no other statistically significantly difference between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to CYC, glucocorticoid alone improved pulmonary function of Japanese SSc-ILD patients, suggesting that this monotherapy is a good alternative when CYC is contraindicated.
Authors: Nicholas Landini; Martina Orlandi; Cosimo Bruni; Edoardo Carlesi; Cosimo Nardi; Linda Calistri; Giovanni Morana; Sara Tomassetti; Stefano Colagrande; Marco Matucci-Cerinic Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-01-27