BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorders often remain unrecognized in clinical practice, which may be a consequence of imprecise recall of manic symptoms earlier in life. This study will therefore examine the validity of the widely-used Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) in detecting a (hypo)manic episode and explore the impact of recall bias. METHODS: As an indication of impairments in recalling manic symptoms, we examined the long-term reliability of the MDQ after two years of follow-up in a sample of 2087 persons. Then, the validity of the MDQ was tested against the gold standard of a CIDI-based DSM-IV (hypo)manic episode. Its performance was compared for detecting a lifetime episode (at T1) versus a recent episode in the past two years (at T2). RESULTS: The long-term reliability of the MDQ was limited as the correct recall of individual items ranged from 44.6% to 68.8% after two years. The overall validity of the MDQ in detecting a lifetime (hypo)manic episode was limited and no adequate cut-off point with acceptable sensitivity and specificity could be identified. However, the MDQ accurately detected a recent episode with a sensitivity of 0.83 and a specificity of 0.82 for the standard and optimal cut-off point of ≥ 7. Taking into account two additional MDQ questions on clustering in time and severity of problems decreased its validity. LIMITATIONS: Patients with a primary, clinical diagnosis of bipolar disorder were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: The MDQ accurately detected recent (hypo)manic episodes, but imprecise recall may result in a limited performance for episodes earlier in life.
BACKGROUND:Bipolar disorders often remain unrecognized in clinical practice, which may be a consequence of imprecise recall of manic symptoms earlier in life. This study will therefore examine the validity of the widely-used Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) in detecting a (hypo)manic episode and explore the impact of recall bias. METHODS: As an indication of impairments in recallingmanic symptoms, we examined the long-term reliability of the MDQ after two years of follow-up in a sample of 2087 persons. Then, the validity of the MDQ was tested against the gold standard of a CIDI-based DSM-IV (hypo)manic episode. Its performance was compared for detecting a lifetime episode (at T1) versus a recent episode in the past two years (at T2). RESULTS: The long-term reliability of the MDQ was limited as the correct recall of individual items ranged from 44.6% to 68.8% after two years. The overall validity of the MDQ in detecting a lifetime (hypo)manic episode was limited and no adequate cut-off point with acceptable sensitivity and specificity could be identified. However, the MDQ accurately detected a recent episode with a sensitivity of 0.83 and a specificity of 0.82 for the standard and optimal cut-off point of ≥ 7. Taking into account two additional MDQ questions on clustering in time and severity of problems decreased its validity. LIMITATIONS: Patients with a primary, clinical diagnosis of bipolar disorder were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: The MDQ accurately detected recent (hypo)manic episodes, but imprecise recall may result in a limited performance for episodes earlier in life.
Authors: Crystal T Clark; Dorothy K Y Sit; Kara Driscoll; Heather F Eng; Andrea L Confer; James F Luther; Stephen R Wisniewski; Katherine L Wisner Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: K Becking; L Boschloo; N Vogelzangs; B C M Haarman; R Riemersma-van der Lek; B W J H Penninx; R A Schoevers Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Lynn Boschloo; Annet T Spijker; Erik Hoencamp; Ralph Kupka; Willem A Nolen; Robert A Schoevers; Brenda W J H Penninx Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Chi Ming Leung; Chi Lap Yim; Connie T Y Yan; Cheuk Chi Chan; Yu-Tao Xiang; Arthur D P Mak; Marcella Lei-Yee Fok; Gabor S Ungvari Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: O Carr; K E A Saunders; A Tsanas; A C Bilderbeck; N Palmius; J R Geddes; R Foster; G M Goodwin; M De Vos Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 4.379