Literature DB >> 23790467

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling-based optimisation of administration schedule for the histone deacetylase inhibitor abexinostat (S78454/PCI-24781) in phase I.

Sylvain Fouliard1, Renata Robert, Anne Jacquet-Bescond, Quentin Chalret du Rieu, Sriram Balasubramanian, David Loury, Yohann Loriot, Antoine Hollebecque, Ioana Kloos, Jean-Charles Soria, Marylore Chenel, Stéphane Depil.   

Abstract

Abexinostat, an oral pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), was evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumours in two single agent phase I studies (PCYC-402 and CL1-78454-002). In PCYC-402 study testing four different administration schedules, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established at 75 mg/m(2) BID (twice daily) and the recommended dose at 60 mg/m(2) BID regardless of the schedule tested. The dose limiting toxicity (DLT), consistently observed across all these schedules, was reversible thrombocytopenia. The CL1-78454-002 study was initially investigating an additional schedule of 14 days on/7 days off. While testing two first cohorts, thrombocytopenia was observed without reaching DLT. To address this issue, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was used to predict the optimal schedule allowing higher doses with minimal thrombocytopenia. Several administration schedules were simulated using this model. A 4 days on/3 days off schedule was associated with the smallest platelet decrease. Accordingly, the CL1-78454-002 study was amended. After reaching MTD1 (75 mg/m(2) BID) with the initial schedule, subsequent cohorts received abexinostat on a revised schedule of 4 days on/3 days off, starting at one dose level below MTD1 (60 mg/m(2) BID). As expected, the dose-escalation continued for two more dose levels beyond MTD1. The MTD2 reached for this optimised schedule was 105 mg/m(2) BID and the recommended dose 90 mg/m(2) BID. In conclusion, early understanding of toxicities and PK determination allowed us to build a PK/PD model of thrombocytopenia, which predicted the optimal administration schedule. This optimised schedule is currently used in the trials in solid tumours with abexinostat.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision support techniques; Drug administration schedule Drug toxicity; Mechanism of action; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23790467     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  11 in total

1.  A population pharmacokinetic/toxicity model for the reduction of platelets during a 48-h continuous intravenous infusion of the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat.

Authors:  Cody J Peer; Oliver M Hall; Tristan M Sissung; Richard Piekarz; Sanjeeve Balasubramaniam; Susan E Bates; William D Figg
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Targeting Histone Deacetylases in Diseases: Where Are We?

Authors:  Rosaria Benedetti; Mariarosaria Conte; Lucia Altucci
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Trichostatin A Sensitizes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells to Enhanced NK Cell-mediated Killing by Regulating Immune-related Genes.

Authors:  Sangsu Shin; Miok Kim; Seon-Jin Lee; Kang-Seo Park; Chang Hoon Lee
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

4.  Phase 1 study of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor abexinostat in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Authors:  Franck Morschhauser; Louis Terriou; Bertrand Coiffier; Emmanuel Bachy; Andrea Varga; Ioana Kloos; Hélène Lelièvre; Anne-Laure Sarry; Stéphane Depil; Vincent Ribrag
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic modeling of abexinostat-induced thrombocytopenia across different patient populations: application for the determination of the maximum tolerated doses in both lymphoma and solid tumour patients.

Authors:  Quentin Chalret du Rieu; Sylvain Fouliard; Mélanie White-Koning; Ioana Kloos; Etienne Chatelut; Marylore Chenel
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 6.  Epigenetic treatment of solid tumours: a review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Clara Nervi; Elisabetta De Marinis; Giovanni Codacci-Pisanelli
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 6.551

Review 7.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors in clinical studies as templates for new anticancer agents.

Authors:  Madhusoodanan Mottamal; Shilong Zheng; Tien L Huang; Guangdi Wang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Time dependent modulation of tumor radiosensitivity by a pan HDAC inhibitor: abexinostat.

Authors:  Sofia Rivera; Céline Leteur; Frédérique Mégnin; Frédéric Law; Isabelle Martins; Ioana Kloos; Stéphane Depil; Nazanine Modjtahedi; Jean Luc Perfettini; Christophe Hennequin; Eric Deutsch
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-25

9.  A phase 1 dose-escalation study of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor abexinostat in combination with standard hypofractionated radiotherapy in advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Eric Deutsch; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal; Vanesa Gregorc; Paolo Andrea Zucali; Jean Menard; Jean-Charles Soria; Ioana Kloos; Jeff Hsu; Ying Luan; Emily Liu; Remus Vezan; Thorsten Graef; Sofia Rivera
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-24

10.  Safety and efficacy of abexinostat, a pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of a phase II study.

Authors:  Vincent Ribrag; Won Seog Kim; Reda Bouabdallah; Soon Thye Lim; Bertrand Coiffier; Arpad Illes; Bernard Lemieux; Martin J S Dyer; Fritz Offner; Zakia Felloussi; Ioana Kloos; Ying Luan; Remus Vezan; Thorsten Graef; Franck Morschhauser
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.