Literature DB >> 23790393

On evolutionary explanations of cognitive biases.

James A R Marshall1, Pete C Trimmer, Alasdair I Houston, John M McNamara.   

Abstract

Apparently irrational biases such as overconfidence, optimism, and pessimism are increasingly studied by biologists, psychologists, and neuroscientists. Functional explanations of such phenomena are essential; we argue that recent proposals, focused on benefits from overestimating the probability of success in conflicts or practising self-deception to better deceive others, are still lacking in crucial regards. Attention must be paid to the difference between cognitive and outcome biases; outcome biases are suboptimal, yet cognitive biases can be optimal. However, given that cognitive biases are subjectively experienced by affected individuals, developing theory and collecting evidence on them poses challenges. An evolutionary theory of cognitive bias might require closer integration of function and mechanism, analysing the evolution of constraints imposed by the mechanisms that determine behaviour.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23790393     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  15 in total

1.  An evolutionary perspective on paranoia.

Authors:  Nichola J Raihani; Vaughan Bell
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-12-17

2.  Pair-bonding influences affective state in a monogamous fish species.

Authors:  Chloé Laubu; Philippe Louâpre; François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Receipt of reward leads to altered estimation of effort.

Authors:  Arezoo Pooresmaeili; Aurel Wannig; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.

Authors:  Patrick Anselme
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

5.  Bayesian decision making in human collectives with binary choices.

Authors:  Víctor M Eguíluz; Naoki Masuda; Juan Fernández-Gracia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mood and personality interact to determine cognitive biases in pigs.

Authors:  Lucy Asher; Mary Friel; Kym Griffin; Lisa M Collins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Learning about and from others' prudence, impatience or laziness: The computational bases of attitude alignment.

Authors:  Marie Devaine; Jean Daunizeau
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Two sides of the same coin: Monetary incentives concurrently improve and bias confidence judgments.

Authors:  Maël Lebreton; Shari Langdon; Matthijs J Slieker; Jip S Nooitgedacht; Anna E Goudriaan; Damiaan Denys; Ruth J van Holst; Judy Luigjes
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Female mate choice in convict cichlids is transitive and consistent with a self-referent directional preference.

Authors:  François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont; Marine Freychet; Sébastien Motreuil; Frank Cézilly
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 10.  Adaptive explanations for sensitive windows in development.

Authors:  Tim W Fawcett; Willem E Frankenhuis
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.