Literature DB >> 23790358

Perpetration of teen dating violence in a networked society.

Josephine D Korchmaros1, Michele L Ybarra, Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Danah Boyd, Amanda Lenhart.   

Abstract

Teen dating violence (TDV) is a serious form of youth violence that youth fairly commonly experience. Although youth extensively use computer-mediated communication (CMC), the epidemiology of CMC-based TDV is largely unknown. This study examined how perpetration of psychological TDV using CMC compares and relates to perpetration using longer-standing modes of communication (LSMC; e.g., face-to-face). Data from the national Growing up with Media study involving adolescents aged 14-19 collected from October 2010 to February 2011 and analyzed May 2012 are reported. Analyses focused on adolescents with a history of dating (n=615). Forty-six percent of youth daters had perpetrated psychological TDV. Of those who perpetrated in the past 12 months, 58% used only LSMC, 17% used only CMC, and 24% used both. Use of both CMC and LSMC was more likely among perpetrators who used CMC than among perpetrators who used LSMC. In addition, communication mode and type of psychological TDV behavior were separately related to frequency of perpetration. Finally, history of sexual intercourse was the only characteristic that discriminated between youth who perpetrated using different communication modes. Results suggest that perpetration of psychological TDV using CMC is prevalent and is an extension of perpetration using LSMC. Prevention should focus on preventing perpetration of LSMC-based TDV as doing so would prevent LSMC as well as CMC-based TDV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23790358      PMCID: PMC3751203          DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw        ISSN: 2152-2715


  15 in total

1.  Partner violence among adolescents in opposite-sex romantic relationships: findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.

Authors:  C T Halpern; S G Oslak; M L Young; S L Martin; L L Kupper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Gender differences in the longitudinal predictors of adolescent dating violence.

Authors:  V A Foshee; F Linder; J E MacDougall; S Bangdiwala
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Problematic situations associated with dating experiences and relationships among urban African American adolescents: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Terri N Sullivan; Elizabeth H Erwin; Sarah W Helms; Saba W Masho; Albert D Farrell
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2010-12

4.  The role of electronic communication technology in adolescent dating violence.

Authors:  Claire Burke Draucker; Donna S Martsolf
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs       Date:  2010-08

5.  Psychosocial factors associated with reports of physical dating violence victimization among U.S. adolescent males.

Authors:  Donna E Howard; Min Qi Wang; Fang Yan
Journal:  Adolescence       Date:  2008

6.  The Safe Dates Project: theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings.

Authors:  V A Foshee; G F Linder; K E Bauman; S A Langwick; X B Arriaga; J L Heath; P M McMahon; S Bangdiwala
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Reasons, assessments and actions taken: sex and age differences in uses of Internet health information.

Authors:  Michele Ybarra; Michael Suman
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2006-07-31

8.  Dating violence among a nationally representative sample of adolescent girls and boys: associations with behavioral and mental health.

Authors:  Diann M Ackard; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer; Peter Hannan
Journal:  J Gend Specif Med       Date:  2003

9.  Internet prevention messages: targeting the right online behaviors.

Authors:  Michele L Ybarra; Kimberly J Mitchell; David Finkelhor; Janis Wolak
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2007-02

10.  Psychosocial factors associated with adolescent boys' reports of dating violence.

Authors:  Donna E Howard; Min Qi Wang
Journal:  Adolescence       Date:  2003
View more
  6 in total

1.  An Examination of the Partner Cyber Abuse Questionnaire in a College Student Sample.

Authors:  Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger; Heather Zapor; Hope Brasfield; Jeniimarie Febres; JoAnna Elmquist; Meagan Brem; Ryan C Shorey; Gregory L Stuart
Journal:  Psychol Violence       Date:  2015-06-08

2.  Willingness to Disclose Sexually Transmitted Infection Status to Sex Partners Among College-Aged Men in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Pfeiffer; Kyle A McGregor; Barbara Van Der Pol; Cathlene Hardy Hansen; Mary A Ott
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Prevalence and Correlates of the Perpetration of Cyber Dating Abuse among Early Adolescents.

Authors:  Melissa F Peskin; Christine M Markham; Ross Shegog; Jeff R Temple; Elizabeth R Baumler; Robert C Addy; Belinda Hernandez; Paula Cuccaro; Efrat K Gabay; Melanie Thiel; Susan Tortolero Emery
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-09-24

4.  The Temporal Association Between Traditional and Cyber Dating Abuse Among Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeff R Temple; Hye Jeong Choi; Meagan Brem; Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger; Gregory L Stuart; Melissa Fleschler Peskin; JoAnna Elmquist
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2015-11-02

5.  Prevalence, age of initiation, and patterns of co-occurrence of digital dating abuse behaviors nationwide.

Authors:  Alice M Ellyson; Avanti Adhia; Vivian H Lyons; Frederick P Rivara
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2021-01-05

6.  Teen Dating Violence, Sexism, and Resilience: A Multivariate Analysis.

Authors:  María Dosil; Joana Jaureguizar; Elena Bernaras; Juliana Burges Sbicigo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.