Literature DB >> 23790264

Purchaser-provider splits in health care-the case of Finland.

Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen1, Ilmo Keskimäki, Juhani Lehto.   

Abstract

The purchaser-provider split (PPS) is a service delivery model in which third-party payers are kept organizationally separate from service providers. The operations of the providers are managed by contracts. One of the main aims of PPS is to create competition between providers. Competition and other incentive structures built into the contractual relationship are believed to lead to improvements in service delivery, such as improved cost containment, greater efficiency, organizational flexibility, better quality and improved responsiveness of services to patient needs. PPS was launched in Finland in the early 1990s but was not widely implemented until the early 2000s. Compared to other countries with PPS the development and implementation of PPS in Finland has been unusual. Firstly, purchasing is implemented at the level of municipalities, which means that the size of the Finnish purchasers is extremely small. Elsewhere purchasing is mostly implemented at the regional or national levels. Secondly, PPS is also applied to primary health care and A&E services while in other countries the services mainly include specialized health care and residential care for the elderly. Thirdly, PPS in health and social services is not regulated by any specific legislation, regulative mechanisms or guidelines. Instead it is regulated within the same framework as public procurement in general.
Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Commissioning; Contracting out; Finland; Outsourcing; Public procurement; Purchaser–provider split

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23790264     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  8 in total

1.  Fail to prepare and you can prepare to fail: the experience of financing path changes in teaching hospitals in Iran.

Authors:  Leila Doshmangir; Arash Rashidian; Mehdi Jafari; Hamid Ravaghi; Amirhossein Takian
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Stakeholder analysis of Iran's health insurance system.

Authors:  Majid Heydari; Hesam Seyedin; Mehdi Jafari; Reza Dehnavieh
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2018-10-29

3.  The roles of health maintenance organizations in the implementation of a social health insurance scheme in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria: a mixed-method investigation.

Authors:  Eric Obikeze; Obinna Onwujekwe
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-03-12

Review 4.  Healthcare financing in Egypt: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ahmad Fasseeh; Baher ElEzbawy; Wessam Adly; Rawda ElShahawy; Mohsen George; Sherif Abaza; Amr ElShalakani; Zoltán Kaló
Journal:  J Egypt Public Health Assoc       Date:  2022-01-07

5.  Trust-based service innovation of municipal home care: a longitudinal mixed methods study.

Authors:  Tom Eide; Monika K Gullslett; Hilde Eide; Janne H Dugstad; Brendan McCormack; Etty R Nilsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 2.908

6.  Between ideals and reality in home-based rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sissel Steihaug; Jan-W Lippestad; Anne Werner
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.581

7.  Care-managers' professional choices: ethical dilemmas and conflicting expectations.

Authors:  Siri Tønnessen; Gøril Ursin; Berit Støre Brinchmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  A critical analysis of health care purchasing arrangements in Kenya: A case study of the county departments of health.

Authors:  Rahab Mbau; Edwine Barasa; Kenneth Munge; Stephen Mulupi; Peter K Nguhiu; Jane Chuma
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2018-08-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.