Literature DB >> 23789972

Return behavior of occasional and multigallon blood donors: the role of theory of planned behavior, self-identity, and organizational variables.

Anne Wevers1, Daniël H J Wigboldus, Rick van Baaren, Ingrid J T Veldhuizen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For blood establishments it is important that blood donors return for a donation. Past research has stressed the importance of theory of planned behavior (TPB) on return behavior, but self-identity (SI) and organizational variables (OVs) might play a role as well. This study added SI and OVs to the TPB to identify the determinants for return behavior. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Whole blood donors (n = 2005) completed a questionnaire assessing TPB, SI, and OVs. OVs contained "perceived satisfaction with the blood bank" and "feeling pressure from the blood bank to donate blood." Return behavior over the past 2 years was dichotomized as low return (0%-50%) versus high return (51%-100%). Logistic regression analyses assessed the effects of TPB, SI, and OVs on high return, separately for occasional donors (two to 10 lifetime donations) and multigallon donors (>10 lifetime donations).
RESULTS: Results showed that, for all donors, affective attitude was positively associated with return behavior, whereas pressure to donate blood was negatively associated with return behavior. The point estimates of self-efficacy, SI, and perceived satisfaction are high for multigallon donors, but do not reach significance.
CONCLUSION: For all donors, positive feelings about donating blood stimulate return behavior, while experiencing a pressure to donate blood emanating from the blood bank was not beneficial. Results suggest that multigallon donors are more stimulated to return when they score higher on self-efficacy, SI, and perceived satisfaction. Interventions aiming at donor retention need to be carefully formulated to avoid negative effects of feeling pressure to donate blood.
© 2013 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23789972     DOI: 10.1111/trf.12309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  5 in total

Review 1.  Individual, contextual and network characteristics of blood donors and non-donors: a systematic review of recent literature.

Authors:  Tjeerd W Piersma; René Bekkers; Elisabeth F Klinkenberg; Wim L A M De Kort; Eva-Maria Merz
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  The relative efficacy of three interventions to favour return to give blood.

Authors:  Geneviève Myhal; Gaston Godin; Sophie Dubuc
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  A brief motivational interview with action and coping planning components enhances motivational autonomy among volunteer blood donors.

Authors:  Christopher R France; Janis L France; Bruce W Carlson; Debra A Kessler; Mark Rebosa; Beth H Shaz; Katrala Madden; Patricia M Carey; Kristen R Fox; Irina E Livitz; Brett Ankawi; P Maxwell Slepian
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  The operationalization of self-identity in reasoned action models: a systematic review of self-identity operationalizations in three decades of research.

Authors:  Marwin H M Snippe; Gjalt-Jorn Ygram Peters; Gerjo Kok
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2021-01-28

5.  How to increase first-time donors' returns? The postdonation letter's content can make a difference.

Authors:  Lisa S Moussaoui; Jerôme Blondé; Coralie Chaduc-Lemoine; Serena Baldelli; Olivier Desrichard; Sophie Waldvogel
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.