Solvent-induced aggregates of nanoring cyclic polymers may be transferred by electrospray deposition to a surface where they adsorb as three-dimensional columnar stacks. The observed stack height varies from single rings to four stacked rings with a layer spacing of 0.32 ± 0.04 nm as measured using scanning tunneling microscopy. The flexibility of the nanorings results in distortions from a circular shape, and we show, through a comparison with Monte Carlo simulations, that the bending stiffness increases linearly with the stack height. Our results show that noncovalent interactions may be used to control the shape and mechanical properties of artificial macromolecular aggregates offering a new route to solvent-induced control of two-dimensional supramolecular organization.
Solvent-induced aggregates of nanoring cyclic polymers may be transferred by electrospray deposition to a surface where they adsorb as three-dimensional columnar stacks. The observed stack height varies from single rings to four stacked rings with a layer spacing of 0.32 ± 0.04 nm as measured using scanning tunneling microscopy. The flexibility of the nanorings results in distortions from a circular shape, and we show, through a comparison with Monte Carlo simulations, that the bending stiffness increases linearly with the stack height. Our results show that noncovalent interactions may be used to control the shape and mechanical properties of artificial macromolecular aggregates offering a new route to solvent-induced control of two-dimensional supramolecular organization.
The use of noncovalent interactions
to control the relative placement of molecules on surfaces has been
exploited for the formation of a wide variety of two-dimensional supramolecular
networks with tailored dimensions, symmetry, and functionality.[1−3] The component molecules in these arrays are typically small and
may be considered rigid, but there has recently been growing interest
in the adsorption and on-surface synthesis of much larger and more
flexible species, such as extended one-dimensional polymers and other
molecules which exhibit conformational freedom.[4−11] The precise conformation of an adsorbed polymer is difficult to
control since the intramolecular elastic energy associated with the
intrinsic flexibility of the molecule can be comparable with intermolecular
and molecule–surface interactions. We show here that noncovalent
interactions may be used to control the shape of flexible polymers
by exploiting a newly observed, and unexpected, supramolecular organization
of cyclic porphyrinpolymer nanorings into stacked columns. The nanorings
are deposited using electrospray, and the stacking arises from a solvent-dependent
aggregation which is preserved after deposition. The stacking results
in an increase in the bending stiffness of the polymer nanorings and
a transition to a near circular shape. Our results provide an analogue
of the conformational control afforded by tertiary structure and self-assembly
in biopolymers. We demonstrate that solvent-induced supramolecular
organization can be used to control the shape of artificial macromolecular
aggregates with molecular weights comparable with those of many naturally
occurring proteins.Porphyrin molecules attract widespread interest
due to their optoelectronic
properties and have been investigated widely across the physical[12] and biological[13] sciences.
In recent work the synthesis of a new type of porphyrin-derived nanostructure,
a cyclic polymer nanoring, has been demonstrated.[14,15] These butadiyne-linked nanorings are synthesized using a template-directed
strategy, via the formation of Vernier self-assemblies. These new
materials attract great interest[16−18] due to the delocalized
nature of their molecular orbitals and their similarity to the biological
light-harvesting complexes LH1 and LH2.[19,20] Using the
Vernier-templating approach, it is possible to synthesize nanorings
with precise control of the number of porphyrin groups, and it has
been possible to isolate cyclic structures with 6, 8, 12, 16, 18,
and 24 porphyrin units.[14,15] A schematic diagram
of c-P24, the nanoring with 24 linked Zn porphyrins, is shown in Figure 1A. Octyloxy side chains are attached to the porphyrin
macrocycle via aryl groups to promote solubility. The center-to-center
porphyrin spacing in analogue linear polymers is 1.33 nm, implying
a diameter of 10.16 nm (the separation of diametrically opposed Zn
atoms) for c-P24 assuming a circular conformation.
Figure 1
(A) Chemical structure
of c-P24. (B) c-P24 on Au(111) deposited
from methanol/toluene 1:3, 5% pyridine. (C) c-P12 on Au(111) deposited
from methanol/toluene 1:3. Scanning parameters: tunnel current, 30
pA, sample voltage −1.8 V (B), −2.0 V (C). Scale bars:
20 nm (B, C).
(A) Chemical structure
of c-P24. (B) c-P24 on Au(111) deposited
from methanol/toluene 1:3, 5% pyridine. (C) c-P12 on Au(111) deposited
from methanol/toluene 1:3. Scanning parameters: tunnel current, 30
pA, sample voltage −1.8 V (B), −2.0 V (C). Scale bars:
20 nm (B, C).We have investigated
c-P24 and also c-P12, the analogue cyclicpolymer with 12 porphyrin units, using scanning tunneling microscopy
(STM) following deposition of the nanorings on an Au(111) surface
using electrospray. This technique permits the direct transfer of
large molecules, which are not compatible with sublimation, from solution
into an ultrahigh vacuum system (base pressure 2 × 10–10 Torr).[21−23] For our experiments the solution concentration was
100 μg/mL of nanorings in a methanol/toluene mixture (1:3 by
volume), or the same solution with added 5% by volume tetrahydrofuran
(THF) or pyridine. The solution was passed at a flow rate of ∼10
μL/min through a stainless steel emitter held at ∼1.8
kV under atmospheric conditions. A highly directional jet of droplets
then enters the vacuum system via a narrow capillary tube, passes
through a series of differentially pumped skimmer apertures, and then
impinges on a gold substrate. Further experimental details are included
in Supporting Information.Figure 1B shows an STM image following the
deposition of c-P24 from a solution with added pyridine. The 24 individual
porphyrin units may be clearly resolved (see for example inset to
Figure 1B), and in common with nearly all adsorbed
c-P24 at low coverage, we find that adsorption occurs preferentially
with the nanoring overlapping one or more step edges on the Au(111)
surface (in many cases one or two porphyrin macrocycles partially
overlap the step edge resulting in an appearance of the step running
tangentially to the ring edge; further images for lower c-P24 coverage
are included in the Supporting Information). The topographic height (typically 0.1 nm) and uniformity of contrast
of the nanorings indicate that the porphyrin units are adsorbed parallel
to the surface, although some distortion of the porphyrin macrocycle[24] cannot be ruled out from our images. The conformation
for c-P24 shows a significant deviation from a circular shape; for
example the nanoring in Figure 1B inset has
long and short axes equal to 12 and 7 nm, respectively. This implied
flexibility is consistent with our previous studies of analogue linear
polymers with average lengths of ∼50 nm which exhibit bending
with a radius of curvature as small as 1.3 nm, equivalent to a 180°
degree turn over a circumference of ∼3 porphyrin repeat units.[5]Figure 1C shows,
for comparison, images
of c-P12, an analogue nanoring with 12 porphyrin units which are also
preferentially adsorbed at Au terrace steps. For c-P12 the deviation
from a circular shape is much reduced as compared with c-P24. The
observation of a preferential adsorption site indicates that both
the c-P12 and c-P24 nanorings may diffuse intact across the surface
following adsorption and that the barrier for diffusion, even for
such mesoscale structures (c-P24 has dimensions ∼10 nm and
a molecular weight of ∼25 kDa), may be overcome at room temperature
on experimental time scales (for other examples of macromolecular
adsorption and diffusion see Deng et al.[8] and Tanaka and Kawai[25]).The rational
formation of covalent links prior to deposition offers
a novel and alternative route to the organization of porphyrins on
surfaces and may be contrasted with the approach adopted in many previous
studies where positional control of porphyrins is realized through
the incorporation of side groups which promote supramolecular organization
or covalent bond formation through Ullmann-type on-surface reactions.[26−28] In addition the observed stacking represents a new route to supramolecular
organization perpendicular to a surface.[29]The surface topography is significantly different if the c-P24
nanorings are deposited without the addition of pyridine to the toluene/methanol
mixture (see Figure 2A). In this case we observe
nanorings which have different apparent heights, 0.1 and 0.8 nm, respectively,
for the left and right nanoring in Figure 2A, although 24 porphyrin subunits may still be resolved. In larger
area images (see Figure 2C) we observe nanorings
with different heights and also many which are partially overlapping.
Also observed in Figure 2C (top center) is
a nanoring which appears less stable under these scanning conditions;
this may be due to a less stable adsorption site remote from the step
edges.
Figure 2
(A) STM image of a single height (left), and stacked (right) c-P24
nanoring deposited from methanol/toluene 1:3. Scale bar 6 nm. (B)
Height profile of the blue and red marked traces shows the different
ring heights. (C) Larger area shows different ring heights for triple
(3), double (2), and single (1) rings. The arrow indicates the crossing
point of overlapping nanorings. Scale bar 20 nm. Tunnel current, 30
pA, sample voltage −1.8 V.
(A) STM image of a single height (left), and stacked (right) c-P24
nanoring deposited from methanol/toluene 1:3. Scale bar 6 nm. (B)
Height profile of the blue and red marked traces shows the different
ring heights. (C) Larger area shows different ring heights for triple
(3), double (2), and single (1) rings. The arrow indicates the crossing
point of overlapping nanorings. Scale bar 20 nm. Tunnel current, 30
pA, sample voltage −1.8 V.A histogram (Figure 3A) shows that
nanoring
heights are clustered around discrete values, and we therefore ascribe
the higher features to stacks of two and three nanorings. We have
analyzed similar images acquired using a solution with added THF (5%),
and the relevant histogram is also shown in Figure 3A. Heights are clustered at similar values, although we observe
in this case a structure with apparent height of 1.1 nm, corresponding
to four layers.
Figure 3
(A) Histogram of nanoring heights from different solutions
(upper,
methanol–toluene 1:3; lower, the same methanol–toluene
mixture with 5% (by volume) THF added). The peaks for heights <0.2
nm have been scaled down for clarity. (B) Peak position in the histogram
versus the peak number.
(A) Histogram of nanoring heights from different solutions
(upper,
methanol–toluene 1:3; lower, the same methanol–toluene
mixture with 5% (by volume) THF added). The peaks for heights <0.2
nm have been scaled down for clarity. (B) Peak position in the histogram
versus the peak number.In Figure 3B the histogram peak position
is plotted versus peak number and is found to be linear with a gradient,
corresponding to the layer spacing in the stacks, of 0.32 ± 0.04
nm. This value is consistent with parallel alignment of porphyrin
groups and stabilization of the stacked nanorings by π–π
interactions.[30,31]Also present on the surface
are partially overlapping nanorings
(see Figure 2C). The height of the crossing
points of two single layer rings corresponds to that of a double layer
stacked ring (see arrow in Figure 2C; for height
profiles and a discussion of the crossing of double and single layer
rings see Supporting Information), providing
further evidence that the high contrast nanorings arise from stacking.The dependence on solvent indicates that the columnar stacks are
preformed prior to deposition on the surface. The formation of such
stacks through alternative mechanisms where rings are adsorbed as
monomers and then undergo organizational changes leading to the observed
structures are highly unlikely and would not be expected to have a
dependence on solvent. Furthermore the stacked nanorings are, like
the single layers, found to be preferentially adsorbed at step edges
indicating that these complex aggregates can diffuse intact across
the surface following adsorption.The addition of pyridine to
the solution of c-P24, which inhibits
the nanoring stacking, also results in a color change from red to
green. UV–visible–NIR titrations show that the Q-band
shifts to shorter wavelengths (from 850 to 820 nm) and that the B-band
becomes narrower (at around 480 nm) on addition of pyridine; both
of these spectral changes indicate that pyridine causes dissociation
of stacked aggregates.[32,33] It is well-known that amine ligands
such as pyridine can prevent the aggregation of metalloporphyrins
by axial coordination to the central metal cation, and these observations
provide further support that the stacking occurs in solution prior
to deposition.The stacked nanorings in Figure 2 have a
shape which is closer to circular than the single height rings. The
deviation from circularity is characterized by the parameter g = a/b – 1, where a and b are, respectively, the long and
short axes of a nanoring. For an ellipse g is related
to the flattening factor, f (g = fb/a) and for a circle g = 0. We find a systematic dependence of g on stack
height with a mean value, g̅ = 0.55 ±
0.05 for a single layer, a lower value for a double layer, 0.31 ±
0.08, while for triple layers g̅ = 0.28 ±
0.03. For comparison g̅ = 0.27 ± 0.02
for single layers of c-P12.The reduction in the value of g implies an increased
mechanical stiffness of the nanoring as the number of stacked rings
is increased. The deformation energy, E, due to bending
of a continuous elastic ring is proportional to κB, the bending stiffness, and is given by a path integral of the local
curvature C(s), where s is the loop coordinate, around the ring,[34]For an ellipse the relationship between E and g may be determined analytically.[35] For the nanorings considered here, the shapes
are less regular so a numerical approach is required. Accordingly
we use Monte Carlo simulations to calculate g̅ for a segmented elastic ring in thermal contact with a heat bath
at temperature T and use these calculated values
to estimate the variation of bending stiffness with stack height.To model a c-PN nanoring, N bending
points, labeled by index i, are defined at positions
{r} with an equilibrium
separation L which is equivalent to the length of
the repeat unit (1.33 nm) of the cyclic polymer. The energy may be
rewritten in discrete form in terms of {s}, where s = r – r (see inset of Figure 4A). A further constraint is that the bending angle
at each linking point is limited to 60° by placing hard discs
(overlapping of which costs an infinite energy penalty) with radii
√3L/2 at the midpoints between bending points.
To generate thermally equilibrated nanorings obeying these energetics,
Monte Carlo simulations are performed using the Metropolis algorithm
(see Supporting Information for more details).
The characteristic bending, κB/L, and thermal, kT, energies are the only relevant
energy scales and the calculated behavior is determined only by the
ratio R = κB/LkT which may be considered as a dimensionless rigidity.
Figure 4
(A) Plot of simulation
results of g̅ against R for N = 12 and N = 24
with experimental data points placed on the curves. Inset: Schematic
diagram showing a section of the nanoring model. (B) Extracted R values plotted against the number of layers in a nanoring,
with a linear line of best fit with zero intercept and slope of 6.06.
(A) Plot of simulation
results of g̅ against R for N = 12 and N = 24
with experimental data points placed on the curves. Inset: Schematic
diagram showing a section of the nanoring model. (B) Extracted R values plotted against the number of layers in a nanoring,
with a linear line of best fit with zero intercept and slope of 6.06.Figure 4A shows the variation of g̅ with R for N =
12 and N = 24 with the experimental points overlaid.
As expected, the departure from circularity increases if the stiffness
decreases or the number of bending points increases. From these results
the value of R can be estimated from the measured
values of g̅, and the inferred dependence of R on the stack height is shown in Figure 4B. Of particular significance is the near equality, within
experimental error, of R for single layers of c-P12
and c-P24. This is expected since κB and L, which determine R, depend only on the
chemical nature of the polymer repeat unit and are independent of
nanoring size. This equality provides strong support for our theoretical
approach based on rings in thermal equilibrium. Furthermore Figure 4B shows a linear dependence of R on stack height with zero intercept and a slope of 6 ± 1. This
result indicates that the bending stiffness κB has
a simple linear dependence on the stack height.Using a value
of kT ≈ 25 meV corresponding
to room temperature, the bending rigidity of single layered nanorings
is κB ≈ 0.03 nN·nm2 (rising
to 0.07 nN·nm2 and 0.10 nN·nm2 for
double and triple layers, respectively). Furthermore we can estimate
the persistence length for an analogue single-layer linear polymer, lP = κB/kT ∼
8 nm.[32] This value is significantly lower
than the correlation length ∼25 nm measured previously for
linear porphyrin polymers. This difference arises from the parallel
alignment of neighboring densely packed linear polymers, as discussed
in our previous work,[5] which is not relevant
for the isolated nanorings which we consider here.Our results
imply that the bending stiffness of the nanoring stacks
is approximately equal to the sum of the contributions of the component
rings. This suggests that the interactions which stabilize the stacking
are only weakly affected by bending. This observation is consistent
with a model whereby the interactions between nanorings in a stack
are dominated by the coplanar stacking of porphyrin macrocycles, which
is assumed here to arise from π–π interactions,
whereas the in-plane bending is dominated by the butadiyne linker
groups. These latter groups would be expected to have a weaker and
less directional interaction with equivalent groups in adjacent stack
layers. While we believe this model is plausible, it implies a specific
relative positioning of porphyrins in adjacent layers. The registry
of buried layers cannot be determined from our STM images with confidence
although our images are consistent with rings stacking directly on
top of each other without any obvious offset, and the positions of
the 24 porphyrin groups in the top layer of the stack can be resolved
in many images (see Supporting Information for an example). In contrast the partially overlapping rings discussed
earlier (and identified in Figure 2) cross
at angles close to 90° consistent with our previous studies of
overlapping linear analogue polymers.The histogram in Figure 3 implies that a
stack of three nanorings (height 0.7 nm) is particularly stable. For
a simple aggregation of nanorings we would expect a monotonic decrease
in the frequency of occurrence for stacks with increasing layer numbers.
However in the absence of THF we find that the three-layer stacks
are much more frequently observed than the two layer stacks, while
for added THF the frequencies are approximately equal. In addition
we observe no four stacks in the absence of THF and a very small fraction
when THF is added. This implies that the three layer stack has enhanced
stability. Although the mechanism for this enhancement is unclear
at this stage, it may be associated with steric effects arising from
the packing of the solubilizing side groups.Our results show
that supramolecular organization of synthetic
molecular nanostructures can result in a modification of collective
properties of the resulting aggregate giving rise, in this example
to an enhanced mechanical stiffness. In addition we have shown that
the effect is controlled by choice of solvent and is preserved following
transfer by electrospray from solution onto a clean surface held under
vacuum. The largest aggregate observed has a molecular weight >100
kDa, comparable with large protein molecules. Previous work on linear
porphyrin-based molecular wires has demonstrated that the formation
of supramolecular stacks can facilitate charge transport by enhancing
electronic coupling and creating a narrower distribution of electronic
states along the chain.[36,37] The nanorings discussed
here are of great interest since their large size and extended π
conjugation holds promise for the exploration of Aharonov–Bohm
effects at the molecular level.[38,39] The columnar stacking
we observe will be important for such studies since they suppress
randomness in shape and stabilize a near-circular conformation with
maximal enclosed large areas as required for currently accessible
high magnetic fields.
Authors: Dmitry V Kondratuk; Luis M A Perdigao; Melanie C O'Sullivan; Simon Svatek; Gareth Smith; James N O'Shea; Peter H Beton; Harry L Anderson Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Alex Saywell; Johannes K Sprafke; Louisa J Esdaile; Andrew J Britton; Anna Rienzo; Harry L Anderson; James N O'Shea; Peter H Beton Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2010-11-22 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Matthew O Blunt; James C Russell; Maria del Carmen Gimenez-Lopez; Nassiba Taleb; Xiang Lin; Martin Schröder; Neil R Champness; Peter H Beton Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2010-11-21 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Magalí Lingenfelder; Giulia Tomba; Giovanni Costantini; Lucio Colombi Ciacchi; Alessandro De Vita; Klaus Kern Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2007 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Aleksey A Kocherzhenko; Sameer Patwardhan; Ferdinand C Grozema; Harry L Anderson; Laurens D A Siebbeles Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Dennis Mössinger; Debangshu Chaudhuri; Tibor Kudernac; Shengbin Lei; Steven De Feyter; John M Lupton; Sigurd Höger Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Dmitry V Kondratuk; Luís M A Perdigão; Ayad M S Esmail; James N O'Shea; Peter H Beton; Harry L Anderson Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Chaw-Keong Yong; Patrick Parkinson; Dmitry V Kondratuk; Wei-Hsin Chen; Andrew Stannard; Alex Summerfield; Johannes K Sprafke; Melanie C O'Sullivan; Peter H Beton; Harry L Anderson; Laura M Herz Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Alex Summerfield; Matteo Baldoni; Dmitry V Kondratuk; Harry L Anderson; Stephen Whitelam; Juan P Garrahan; Elena Besley; Peter H Beton Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 14.919