Literature DB >> 23788937

Effect of combination of rapamycin and cisplatin on human cervical carcinoma Hela cells.

Lu Han1, Jie-Ling Wu, Li-Xiao Yang.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the effect of combined use of rapamycin and cisplatin against Hela cells in vitro.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The inhibitory effects of rapamycin and cisplatin, used alone or combination, on the proliferation of Hela cell were measured with MTT assay and median-effect plot analysis.
RESULTS: Combined use of rapamycin and cisplatin significantly improved the chemotherapeutic effect against Hela cells. The inhibitory rates were dose-dependent. Rapamycin and cisplatin showed synergistic effects in the chemotherapy of Hela cells (q > 1.15, King's formula).
CONCLUSIONS: Combined use of rapamycin and cisplatin significantly improves the chemotherapeutic effect against Hela cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hela cells; cervical carcinoma; cisplatin; rapamycin

Year:  2013        PMID: 23788937      PMCID: PMC3687477          DOI: 10.5114/wo.2012.32483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)        ISSN: 1428-2526


Introduction

As the traditional treatment means of cervical carcinoma, operative treatment is limited to early patients. Although radiotherapy can be used for most medium and advanced patients, it is always ineffective for recurrent advanced patients after radiotherapy. The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of cervical carcinoma is increasing, and it is mainly used for patients receiving new adjuvant chemotherapy and advanced or recurrent patients. However, its apparent side effects and drug resistance [1] are also the main reasons why advanced patients cannot adhere to treatment. With increasing understanding of tumor at the cell and molecule level, molecular targeted therapy is of increasing importance. mTOR is the most popular therapeutic target of malignant tumor in current studies. It has been proved that mTOR inhibitor rapamycin (Rapa) and its derivatives have an inhibitory effect on a variety of tumors such as endometrial carcinoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, lymphoma, etc. [2-4]. However, the curative effect is poor for gastroenteric tumor [5]. Domestic and foreign researchers have begun to combine the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin with hormones, chemotherapy drugs or other methods to treat tumors and investigate whether combination application of it and chemotherapy drugs has a synergistic effect and whether the reduced side effects of chemotherapy drugs caused by decrease of their dose can reduce or reverse the resistance to chemotherapy drugs [6, 7]. In this study, the combination of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin with cisplatin was used to affect cervical carcinoma Hela cells cultured in vitro to investigate its inhibitory effect on the growth situation of cervical carcinoma Hela cells and analyze the effectiveness of drug combination. In the investigation the combination of the lowest concentration of rapamycin and cisplatin was used to achieve the most apparent inhibitory effect on cervical carcinoma Hela cells cultured in vitro in order to provide a new idea and method for the further clinical application of rapamycin and provide a theoretical basis for developing the new combination chemotherapy regimen of cervical carcinoma in clinical practice.

Material and methods

Cell culture

Hela cells were cultured in PRMI 1640 (Gibco) culture medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/l streptomycin in an incubator containing 5% CO2 (V/V) at 37°C, and cell growth situations were observed. When the cells grew and covered 70%∼80% of the culture bottle wall, 0.25% trypsase was used for digestion, and timely passage was conducted. Subsequently, the cells were continuously cultured. Finally, the cells in logarithmic growth phase were selected for trials.

Drug intervention

On the day before administration, the cells were digested with trypsase and counted. The cells (2 × 106 cells /ml) were spread onto a 96-well plate to make the cell density on administration day be 70%∼80%. After the cells adhered onto the wall, different concentrations of complete media of 200 µl were added into each well. Next, the cells were incubated in the incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37°C for 48 h. Different concentrations of drugs were added into the cells. In the simple drug administration experiment, the whole group was divided into the cell control group, rapamycin group and cisplatin group. For the cell control group, the cells were cultured in the equivalent medium without a drug. For the rapamycin group, 4 concentration gradients were applied: 10 nmol/ml, 20 nmol/ml, 40 nmol/ml and 80 nmol/ml. For the cisplatin group, 4 concentration gradients were applied: 0.125 mg/ml, 0.25 mg/ml, 0.50 mg/ml and 1.00 mg/ml. In addition, in 3 wells only culture liquid was added. For the drug combination experiment, inhibitory effects of the combinations of 10 nmol/ml and 20 nmol/ml rapamycin with 0.25 mg/ml and 0.50 mg/ml cisplatin on the cells were respectively detected.

MTT

After the drugs affected the cells for 48 h, 15 µl of MTT (5 mg/ml) was added into each well. After incubation for 4 h at room temperature, 100 µl of DMSO was added into each well. After gently shaking for 10 min, the absorbance value of each well was immediately detected with the microplate reader at 589 nm. Trials were repeated three times, and absorbance values of various repeated wells were averaged. Finally, the inhibition ratio of each group of cells (%) was calculated: inhibition ratio of tumor cell proliferation = (1 – absorbance value of drug administration group/absorbance value of the treatment group) × 100%. Jin's formula q = Ea + b/(Ea + Eb – Ea × Eb) was used to evaluate whether two drugs had a synergistic effect. Ea + b represented the inhibition ratio of the combination group shozhe, and Ea and Eb represented respectively the inhibition ratios of simple drug a and simple group b. If the calculated q value was between 0.85 and 1.15, the effect of combination of two drugs was the simple summation of respective effects; if q > 1.15, the two drugs had a synergistic effect; if q < 0.85, the two drugs had an antagonistic effect.

Results

Inhibitory effects of simple rapamycin and cisplatin and their combination on growth of cervical carcinoma Hela cells

After rapamycin affected cervical carcinoma Hela cells for 48 h, it had an apparent inhibitory effect on their growth. This inhibitory effect was dose-dependent, and it was more apparent with increase of drug concentration. Between various drug groups and the control group, there were significant differences (p < 0.05). Comparison of the result between two adjacent concentration groups showed that there was a significant difference between the 10 nmol/ml group and the 20 nmol/ml group (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between two other adjacent concentration groups. After cisplatin affected the cells for 48 h, compared with the control group, the inhibition ratio increased. It was suggested that cisplatin had an apparent inhibitory effect on growth of cervical carcinoma Hela cells. This inhibitory effect was dose-dependent, and between various drug groups and the control group, there were significant differences (p < 0.05). Comparison of the result between two adjacent concentration groups showed that there were significant differences between two groups among the 0.25 mg/ml group, 0.50 mg/ml group and 1.00 mg/ml group (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between two other adjacent concentration groups. According to the ratios of inhibition of two simple drugs on Hela cells, drug concentrations in the case of drug combination were selected. As drug combinations, 10 nmol/ml and 20 nmol/ml rapamycin were respectively combined with 0.25 mg/ml and 0.50 mg/ml cisplatin to affect cervical carcinoma Hela cells. Comparisons of various drug groups with the control group and comparisons between two adjacent concentration groups showed that there were significant differences (p < 0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1

The influence of rapamycin and cisplatin individually or combined on the growth of Hela cells in vitro

GroupAbsorbance A (X ± S)Inhibition rate (%)
control0.7012 ±0.02010
rapamycin (nmol/ml)
    100.6160 ±0.032512.15* Δ
    200.5459 ±0.031822.14* Δ
    400.5173 ±0.012626.23*
    800.4759 ±0.021832.23*
cisplatin (mg/ml)
    0.1250.6146 ±0.018412.34*
    0.250.5740 ±0.021418.13* Δ
    0.500.5014 ±0.017928.33* Δ
    1.000.4324 ±0.021838.33* Δ
rapamycin (nmol/ml) + cisplatin (mg/ml)
    10+0.250.4464 ±0.026336.34* Δ
    20+0.250.3201 ±0.019854.36* Δ
    10+0.50.2153 ±0.031569.29* Δ
    20+0.50.1497 ±0.032678.65* Δ

p < 0.05 vs. control group

p < 0.05, comparison between two adjacent concentrations

The influence of rapamycin and cisplatin individually or combined on the growth of Hela cells in vitro p < 0.05 vs. control group p < 0.05, comparison between two adjacent concentrations

Calculation of the synergistic effect of the two drugs according to Jin's formula

In terms of the ratios of inhibition of two simple drugs and their combination on Hela cells, it was calculated according to Jin's formula q = Ea + b/(Ea + Eb – Ea × Eb) whether the two drugs had a synergistic or antagonistic effect. Ea + b represented the inhibitory ratio of the combination group, and Ea and Eb respectively the inhibition ratios of simple drug a and simple group b. If the calculated q value was between 0.85 and 1.15, the effect of combination of two drugs was the simple summation of respective effects; if q > 1.15, the two drugs had a synergistic effect; if q < 0.85, the two drugs had an antagonistic effect. As a result, in the case of the combination of rapamycin and cisplatin, q values all were more than 1.15, as shown in Table 2. The result showed that the combination of rapamycin and cisplatin had an apparent effect on Hela cell proliferation, and they had a synergistic effect.
Table 2

Inhibitory effect of rapamycin combined with cisplatin on the proliferation of Hela cells

RapamycinCisplatin

0.25 mg/ml0.5 mg/ml
10 nmol/ml1.181.67
20 nmol/ml1.311.49

all q values > 1.15

Inhibitory effect of rapamycin combined with cisplatin on the proliferation of Hela cells all q values > 1.15

Discussion

Akt/mTOR is one of the cell proliferation-related signal pathways, and it is closely related to occurrence and development of multiple malignant tumors [8-10]. In recent years, mTOR has become a new target of molecular targeted therapy of tumors. Recent studies show that the mTOR specific inhibitor rapamycin has a treatment effect on a variety of tumors such as breast carcinoma, leukocythemia, liver cancer, gallbladder carcinoma, etc. [11-15]. However, at present there are fewer reports on the effect of this drug on cervical carcinoma at home and abroad. The anti-tumor inhibition mechanism of the mTOR specific inhibitor rapamycin is mainly to inhibit conversion of the cell cycle from G1 phase to S phase, induce apoptosis of mutational tumor cells with P53 function deficiency, shut off the energy cycle route and block energy synthesis and utilization of the tumor cell by inhibiting mTOR and block tumor cell growth by inhibiting angiogenesis [16-18], which indicates that rapamycin achieves tumor inhibition by inhibiting tumor cell growth and proliferation and has a targeted antitumor effect on a number of pathways. Some studies have suggested that although rapamycin can kill tumor cells, it could attack normal cells, which was also confirmed in nude mice [19]. At present, chemotherapy of cervical carcinoma mainly uses cisplatin. However, its administration is usually stopped due to non-specific toxic side effects of cisplatin after multiple treatment courses of chemotherapy. Also, clinical effectiveness of drug resistance is not especially ideal. Yuan studied the effects of cisplatin on oophoroma and breast carcinoma tissues and found that increase of Akt activity was possibly one of the main factors causing drug resistance and thus causing failure of cisplatin chemotherapy [20]. Fraser et al. drew the same conclusion in a study of oophoroma [21]. Therefore, it is indicated that we can inhibit tumor cell growth by inhibiting Akt/mTOR to reverse drug resistance of cisplatin. This experiment used simple rapamycin and cisplatin and their combination to carry out in vitro intervention of cervical carcinoma Hela cells, and the research results showed that simple application of rapamycin or cisplatin could inhibit human cervical carcinoma Hela cell strains and the inhibitory effect was dose-dependent. The combination application had a more apparent inhibitory effect on Hela cell proliferation than application of simple drugs. Also, q values of various drug combination groups were more than 1.15, suggesting that combination of the two had a synergistic effect. In a study on lung cancer, Wu et al. [15] proved that mTOR inhibitor could reverse cisplatin resistance and restore sensitivity of lung cancer resistance strains to cisplatin to cause apoptosis of resistant cells, and combination application had an apparent synergistic effect, which was in line with the study result about cervical carcinoma Hela cells in this study. Similarly, Bae-Jump et al. confirmed that combination of rapamycin and cisplatin had a synergistic inhibitory effect on endometrial carcinoma cells [22]. It can be found that rapamycin can really inhibit the growth of human cervical carcinoma Hela cells, and combination application of rapamycin and cisplatin can generate an apparent synergistic effect to increase the inhibition ratio of tumor cells. Therefore, rapamycin can be considered as a complementary drug. Under the premise of equivalent efficacy, concerted application of it and a chemotherapy drug can decrease the application amount of cisplatin, reduce toxic side effects of cisplatin and achieve a more satisfactory drug treatment effect of cervical carcinoma. Rapamycin has a broad-spectrum antitumor effect, and it has been safely and effectively used for tumor patients after organ transplantation. It is still necessary to investigate and explore the discussed application of rapamycin in tumor patients after non-organ transplantation. This study was supported by the Social Development Foundation of Dalian Science and Technology Bureau.
  20 in total

1.  ATP depletion increases phosphorylation of elongation factor eEF2 in adult cardiomyocytes independently of inhibition of mTOR signalling.

Authors:  Laura E McLeod; Christopher G Proud
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 2.  Current development of mTOR inhibitors as anticancer agents.

Authors:  Sandrine Faivre; Guido Kroemer; Eric Raymond
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 3.  Akt-regulated pathways in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pradip K Majumder; William R Sellers
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway but not the MEK/ERK pathway attenuates laminin-mediated small cell lung cancer cellular survival and resistance to imatinib mesylate or chemotherapy.

Authors:  Junji Tsurutani; Kip A West; Jacqueline Sayyah; Joell J Gills; Phillip A Dennis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  The rapamycin-sensitive signal transduction pathway as a target for cancer therapy.

Authors:  M Hidalgo; E K Rowinsky
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Inhibition of corneal neovascularization by rapamycin.

Authors:  Young Sam Kwon; Jae Chan Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 8.718

7.  XIAP regulates Akt activity and caspase-3-dependent cleavage during cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human ovarian epithelial cancer cells.

Authors:  E Asselin; G B Mills; B K Tsang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Rapamycin shows anticancer activity in primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells in vitro, as single agent and in drug combination.

Authors:  Anna Aleskog; Maria Norberg; Peter Nygren; Linda Rickardson; Meena Kanduri; Gerard Tobin; Magnus Aberg; Mats G Gustafsson; Richard Rosenquist; Elin Lindhagen
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2008-12

9.  AKT2 inhibition of cisplatin-induced JNK/p38 and Bax activation by phosphorylation of ASK1: implication of AKT2 in chemoresistance.

Authors:  Zeng-Qiang Yuan; Richard I Feldman; Gene E Sussman; Domenico Coppola; Santo V Nicosia; Jin Q Cheng
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  A phase I clinical trial of low-dose interferon-alpha-2A, thalidomide plus gemcitabine and capecitabine for patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Amato; Muhammad Khan
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  An overview of rapamycin: from discovery to future perspectives.

Authors:  Young Ji Yoo; Hanseong Kim; Sung Ryeol Park; Yeo Joon Yoon
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Expression proteomics study to determine metallodrug targets and optimal drug combinations.

Authors:  Ronald F S Lee; Alexey Chernobrovkin; Dorothea Rutishauser; Claire S Allardyce; David Hacker; Kai Johnsson; Roman A Zubarev; Paul J Dyson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  d-limonene exhibits antitumor activity by inducing autophagy and apoptosis in lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiao Yu; Hongyan Lin; Yu Wang; Wenwen Lv; Shuo Zhang; Ying Qian; Xiaobei Deng; Nannan Feng; Herbert Yu; Biyun Qian
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Radiation enhancing effects of sanazole and gemcitabine in hypoxic breast and cervical cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Yue-Can Zeng; Rong Wu; Yu-Ping Xiao; Yan Xin; Feng Chi; Rui Xing; Ming Xue; Nai-Qian Wang
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2015-06-02

Review 5.  The role of RICTOR amplification in targeted therapy and drug resistance.

Authors:  Deze Zhao; Man Jiang; Xiaochun Zhang; Helei Hou
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 6.354

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.