Literature DB >> 23788885

Oxidative damage and carcinogenesis.

Joanna Katarzyna Strzelczyk1, Andrzej Wiczkowski.   

Abstract

Oxygen is an essential element to conduct life processes but some of the metabolic byproducts e.g. reactive oxygen species (ROS), are toxic for living organisms. Endogenous ROS are produced e.g. reduction of dioxygen; some exogenous sources of radicals also exist, including nicotine and ionizing radiation. Reactive oxygen species include superoxide anion, hydroxyl radical, singlet oxygen, hydrogen peroxide and hypochlorous acid. Carcinogenesis is a multistep process. The exact reasons for the development of cancer are still unknown. Many factors contribute to the development of carcinogenesis, one of which is oxidative stress. Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance between oxidizing agents (pro-oxidants) and antioxidants, agents that protect biomolecules against injury by pro-oxidants. When reactive oxygen species are overproduced it can damage nucleic acids, proteins and lipids. ROS are considered as a significant class of carcinogens participating in cancer initiation, promotion and progression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; carcinogenesis; oxidative damage; oxidative stress; reactive nitrogen species; reactive oxygen species

Year:  2012        PMID: 23788885      PMCID: PMC3687415          DOI: 10.5114/wo.2012.29290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)        ISSN: 1428-2526


Oxygen is an essential element to conduct life processes, but its high chemical reactivity is a reason why some of its metabolic by products are toxic for living organisms. These include reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals [1, 2]. Free radicals are atoms or molecules that can exist independently, yet they have one or more unpaired electrons [3]. Free radicals strive to have their electrons paired, that is to get rid of a surplus electron or to bind another one. Therefore they are highly reactive [4]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) include superoxide anion (•O2 –), hydroxyl radical (•OH), singlet oxygen (1O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl). Reactive oxygen species are produced in endogenous reactions, e.g. in reduction of dioxygen but also under the influence of exogenous sources such as cigarette smoke or ionizing radiation [3, 5–9]. Reactive oxygen species are molecules commonly encountered in living organisms, where they participate in numerous physiological processes. They are mediators in many important functions of organic cells, such as regular growth, differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis [10]. They also play an important role as intra- and extracellular conductors and are the response of cells to tissue hypoxia [2, 3, 7, 9, 11–14]. Oxidative stress is defined as lack of equilibrium between oxidizing substances (pro-oxidants) and antioxidants, that is compounds that protect biomolecules against harmful effects of pro-oxidants [6]. If the volume of created ROS exceeds the organism’s ability to recycle them, damage occurs to nucleic acids, proteins and lipids which, in turn, results in dysfunction of cells, tissues or organs of the body [2, 15–21]. It was proven that intense oxidative stress contributes to the pathomechanism of numerous diseases, including senile cataract, atherosclerosis, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease [22-27]. Excessive synthesis of reactive oxygen species and insufficiency of antioxidant defence mechanisms are also contributing aetiological factors of neoplastic diseases [2, 6, 9, 28–37]. Apart from ROS, cell oxidants also include reactive nitrogen species (RNS), such as nitric oxide radical (NO•) and peroxynitrite ion (ONOO–), also associated with carcinogenesis [7, 13, 38–44]. It is said that RNS are factors that take part in initiation, promotion and progression of carcinogenesis [6, 8, 20, 45–48]. As early as in 1984, Zimmerman and Cerutti [49] proved that exposure of mouse fibroblasts to reactive species of oxygen can lead to carcinogenic transformation of cells. Increased levels of oxidative damage may be a result of: (I) increased production of ROS without further disruption of the antioxidant system, (II) a stable level of ROS with simultaneously a less effective antioxidant system, (III) errors in the system that repairs oxidative damage in the DNA, or (IV) a combination of the above [6, 13, 44, 50]. The conducted research proves that excessive production of ROS and related oxidative stress are features characteristic for neoplastic cells, both in vivo and in vitro [15, 16, 50–57]. Moreover, the results of the research of Kondo et al. [50] showed increased levels of ROS in cases of adenocarcinoma when compared to cases of colorectal cancer. The main causes of increased levels of ROS in neoplastic cells, when compared to the normal tissue surrounding them, is excessive production of ROS related to the ‘respiratory (oxidative) burst’ of phagocytes, as well as an increasing volume of ROS in the part of the circulatory system which surrounds the neoplastic changes [15, 45]. Moreover, increased metabolic activity of neoplastic cells also intensifies production of superoxide anion radical [58]. Reactive oxygen species are considered to be a pro-neoplastic factor as they stimulate proliferation, invasiveness, angiogenesis and metastasis, and inhibit apoptosis [44, 59, 60]. They are able to stimulate development of a neoplasm in the promotion stage through influencing genes related to apoptosis and proliferation. As a result of ‘an attack’ of free radicals, the concentration of Ca2 + ions increases within the intracellular area, which results in activation of proto-oncogenes such as c-fos, c-jun, c-myc or activated protein kinase C (PKC). That, in turn, intensifies proliferation and speeds up the carcinogenesis [2, 6, 61]. High concentrations of ROS and their derivatives influence activation of transcription factors including NF-κB, which results in induction of cytokine gene expression and of growth factors. That leads to intensified proliferation of cells and occurrence of neoplastic lesions in otherwise healthy tissue [6, 14, 44, 62]. Reactive oxygen species also influence activity of proteins involved in the cell cycle, such as p53 protein [14]. If there is no oxidative stress or after a period of mild stress, p53 activity is related to the antioxidant response of the cell through activation of transcription of MnSOD and GPx1 coding genes [63]. High levels of production of reactive oxygen species may also cause increased activity of p53 protein. However, excessive levels of ROS may inhibit p53 activity, which is related to the inhibition of apoptosis [44, 64]. Moreover, a relationship between ROS and invasiveness or occurrence of metastasis was also proven [65-67]. Oberley et al. [68] observed that human cells that originated from metastatic changes in the course of prostate cancer produced more ROS than the original cancer cells. Moreover, the influence of ROS on the development of angiogenesis through an increase in production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was also proven [66, 69]. Numerous research studies indicate participation of ROS, which act within cells, as secondary relays in the intracellular signal cascade. They induce and sustain the oncogenic phenotype of neoplastic cells. Moreover, there is an increasing amount of evidence that ROS can induce aging of cells and their apoptosis or necrosis, as well as being able to inhibit the process of angiogenesis, therefore being antineoplastic molecules [2, 6, 44, 70]. The biggest participation in the process of carcinogenesis, especially in the initiation phase, is attributed to the hydroxyl radical [13, 20]. The hydroxyl radical can react with both the deoxyribose molecule and nitrogenous bases which are elements of the DNA. A reaction between the hydroxyl radical and the deoxyribose molecule produces both single and double cracks of the DNA strands [13, 45, 46]. The results of reactions with nitrogenous bases are their adducts. One of the most typical DNA adducts which is an oxidative product of damage done to nucleic acids is 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) [36, 50, 71–74]. Presence of modified bases can trigger mutational changes which, in turn, may cause inactivation of suppressor genes or activation of proto-oncogenes [6, 8, 13, 45, 75]. The increased levels of 8-OHdG and other modified bases in the DNA are also influenced by possible defects in enzymes that repair oxidative damage in the DNA, which in turn is related to the progression of age-related, increasing incidence of neoplasms [76-78]. Mice without MTH1 enzyme, which hydrolyzes 8OHdGTP, suffered from an increasing incidence of lung, stomach and liver cancer with the progress of age [76, 77]. The superoxide anion radical can inhibit the functions of the mitochondrion through inactivation of the Fe-S centre in the electron transport chain. The ongoing accumulation of damage and inhibition of the mitochondrial activity eventually leads to apoptosis of the cell [2]. It is also assumed that H2O2 plays some role in the process of carcinogenesis. Hydrogen peroxide is not a radical itself but can be easily transformed into one as a result of Fenton’s reaction, in which iron and copper ions (Fe2 +, Cu2 +) participate [45]. Occurrence of H2O2 in higher concentrations was also observed in human tumour cells [13, 51]. The effects of the influence of ROS include not only damage done to the genetic material but also damage of the cell membrane caused most frequently by free radical oxidation reactions of lipid structures. One of the end products of lipid peroxidation is malondialdehyde (MDA), which can have a mutagenic and carcinogenic influence on a cell [2, 30]. Another negative consequence of the presence of ROS is changes in the spatial structure of proteins resulting in the occurrence of new cross-sectional bonds. Moreover, they may cause aggregation and fragmentation of proteins. Additionally, modifications caused by ROS change proteolytic susceptibility and antigenicity of proteins. Denaturation of some proteins was also observed as ROS can oxidize and, subsequently, break thiol groups and disulfide bridges. Reactive oxygen species may cause inactivation of proteolytic inhibitors, which increases activity of proteolytic enzymes against proteins. What is more, ROS react with proteins and lipids, raising the risk of DNA damage [2, 12, 42, 44]. A similar relationship can also be found between other reactive molecules, such as reactive nitrogen species. These oxidants may appear as a result of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). The nitric oxide radical (NO•) can react with •O2 –and create •OH and the peroxynitrite anion (ONOO–), which influences the process of lipid peroxidation causing cracks in the DNA and induces transversion-type mutations. They can also disrupt the respiratory chain in the mitochondrion and influence the phosphorylation process of proteins, including p53 type [6, 8, 13, 14, 34, 39, 79]. Moreover, reactive nitrogen species cause inhibition in the activity of caspases, which is related to delays in apoptosis. Additionally, inhibition of cytochrome oxidase slows down formation of mitochondrial ATP, impairing the course of proliferation, which in turn may delay the growth of a tumour [44, 80]. Cells of eukaryote organisms have created defence mechanisms that limit the level of RNS and damage caused by their actions. Such defence mechanisms include antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione S-transferase and catalase. These enzymes have various isoforms and occur in both intra- and extracellular areas. Their activity forms an integrated antioxidant protection system [2, 6, 7]. As previously mentioned, an increased level of oxidative damage in tumour cells may also be a result of a less efficient antioxidant system. An example of such inefficiency of the antioxidant protection system as a factor which contributes to carcinogenesis can be the case of mice with turned off CuZnSOD gene, which demonstrated an increased incidence of liver tumour progressing with age [81]. Similarly, heterozygous mice that had 50% of content of the regular mitochondrial MnSOD demonstrated an increased incidence of neoplasms such as leukaemia, adenocarcinomas and pituitary adenomas [82]. Chu et al. [83] carried out a study in which they turned off two out of four GPx genes of mice (that is GPx1 and GPx2). This caused the occurrence of colorectal cancer. Moreover, the mice with decreased activity of catalase proved to be more prone to occurrence of breast tumours [84]. Numerous epidemiological research cases prove that an increase in expression of MnSOD in a group of patients with neoplasms correlates with higher invasiveness and aggressiveness of stomach, intestinal, lung and breast cancers [67, 85]. Liu et al. [60] proved that MnSOD inhibits the process of apoptosis in the neoplastic cells of the large intestine. They also demonstrated that a selenium deficiency leads to decreased activity of peroxidases and increased risk of the occurrence of neoplastic lesions [86]. Trosko and Upham [87] suggest that oxidative stress not only causes damage of the DNA but also influences epigenetic modification of gene expression that, in turn, is one of the factors of carcinogenesis. Therefore, the influence that epigenetically modified gene expression has on disturbances in proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis of the cell is more and more often emphasized.
  82 in total

1.  Toxic oxygen: the radical life-giver.

Authors:  Doris Abele
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  A threshold concept for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Q Kong; J A Beel; K O Lillehei
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 3.  Oxidative DNA damage: mechanisms, mutation, and disease.

Authors:  Marcus S Cooke; Mark D Evans; Miral Dizdaroglu; Joseph Lunec
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Is there an answer?

Authors:  Isabella Dalle-Donne; Ranieri Rossi; Daniela Giustarini; Roberto Colombo; Aldo Milzani
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.885

Review 5.  Effects of macronutrient excess and composition on oxidative stress: relevance to diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Antonio Ceriello
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer.

Authors:  H Wiseman; B Halliwell
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 7.  Mutagenesis and carcinogenesis caused by the oxidation of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Yusaku Nakabeppu; Kunihiko Sakumi; Katsumi Sakamoto; Daisuke Tsuchimoto; Teruhisa Tsuzuki; Yoshimichi Nakatsu
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.915

Review 8.  Post-translational disulfide modifications in cell signaling--role of inter-protein, intra-protein, S-glutathionyl, and S-cysteaminyl disulfide modifications in signal transmission.

Authors:  Catherine A O'Brian; Feng Chu
Journal:  Free Radic Res       Date:  2005-05

9.  Production of large amounts of hydrogen peroxide by human tumor cells.

Authors:  T P Szatrowski; C F Nathan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  ROS stress in cancer cells and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Helene Pelicano; Dennis Carney; Peng Huang
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 18.500

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic uses of epicatechin in diabetes and cancer.

Authors:  Layth Abdulmajeed Abdulkhaleq; Mohammed Abdulrazzaq Assi; Mohd Hezmee Mohd Noor; Rasedee Abdullah; Mohd Zamri Saad; Yun Hin Taufiq-Yap
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-08-06

2.  Regulating intracellular ROS signal by a dual pH/reducing-responsive nanogels system promotes tumor cell apoptosis.

Authors:  Kai Dong; Qiuya Lei; Runhao Guo; Xianglong Wu; Yanni Zhang; Ning Cui; Jian-Yu Shi; Tingli Lu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-07-23

3.  Inhibitory Effects of Cu2O/SiO2 on the Growth of Microcystis aeruginosa and Its Mechanism.

Authors:  Gongduan Fan; Minchen Bao; Bo Wang; Shimin Wu; Lingxi Luo; Binhui Li; Jiuhong Lin
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.076

4.  Interactions between Nitric Oxide and Hyaluronan Implicate the Migration of Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Amir M Alsharabasy; Sharon Glynn; Pau Farràs; Abhay Pandit
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.978

Review 5.  Outdoor air pollution and cancer: An overview of the current evidence and public health recommendations.

Authors:  Michelle C Turner; Zorana J Andersen; Andrea Baccarelli; W Ryan Diver; Susan M Gapstur; C Arden Pope; Diddier Prada; Jonathan Samet; George Thurston; Aaron Cohen
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Clinical association of baseline levels of conjugated dienes in low-density lipoprotein and nitric oxide with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and their relationship with immunoglobulins and Th1-to-Th2 ratio.

Authors:  Mustapha Haddouche; Warda Meziane; Zeyneb Hadjidj; Naima Mesli; Mourad Aribi
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2016-05-31

Review 7.  The Cancer Chemopreventive and Therapeutic Potential of Tetrahydrocurcumin.

Authors:  Ching-Shu Lai; Chi-Tang Ho; Min-Hsiung Pan
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-05-29

8.  The Parental Pesticide and Offspring's Epigenome Study: Towards an Integrated Use of Human Biomonitoring of Exposure and Effect Biomarkers.

Authors:  Aziza Menouni; Radu Corneliu Duca; Imane Berni; Mohamed Khouchoua; Manosij Ghosh; Brahim El Ghazi; Noura Zouine; Ilham Lhilali; Dina Akroute; Sara Pauwels; Matteo Creta; Katrien Poels; Peter Hoet; Jeroen Vanoirbeeck; Marie-Paule Kestemont; Paul Janssen; Tara Sabo Attwood; Lode Godderis; Samir El Jaafari
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-12-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.