| Literature DB >> 23788848 |
Marta Biedka1, Roman Makarewicz, Ewa Kopczyńska, Andrzej Marszałek, Alina Goralewska, Hanna Kardymowicz.
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY: This retrospective study attempts to evaluate the influence of serum vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C), microvessel density (MVD) and lymphatic vessel density (LMVD) on the result of tumour treatment in women with cervical cancer.Entities:
Keywords: VEGF-C; angiogenesis; cervical cancer; lymphangiogenesis
Year: 2012 PMID: 23788848 PMCID: PMC3687378 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2012.27330
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Oncol (Pozn) ISSN: 1428-2526
General characteristics of the group of cervical cancer patients
| Before treatment | 6 weeks after treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| CR | PR | PD | ||
| FIGO stage |
|
|
|
|
| Stage I | 23 (39.7) | 18 (78.2) | 0 (0) | 1 (4.3) |
| Stage II | 18 (31) | 13 (72.2) | 1 (5.5) | 3 (16.6) |
| Stage III | 13 (22.4) | 6 (46.1) | 3 (23) | 3 (23) |
| Stage IV | 4 (6.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (75) |
| Grade score of tumour differentiation |
|
|
|
|
| G1 | 2 (6) | 2 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| G2 | 21 (68) | 13 (61.9) | 2 (9.5) | 4 (19) |
| G3 | 8 (26) | 4 (50) | 0 (0) | 1 (12.5) |
| Kind of planning treatment |
|
|
|
|
| Brachytherapy + surgery | 33 (56.8) | 24 (72,7) | 0 (0) | 3 (9) |
| Brachytherapy + teletherapy | 17 (29.3) | 9 (52.9) | 3 (17.6) | 5 (29.4) |
| Brachytherapy | 8 (13.7) | 3 (37.5) | 1 (12.5) | 3 (37.5) |
CR – complete response; PR – partial response; PD – progression of disease
Lymph node status in operated patients
| Patients’ characteristics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Before treatment | 6 weeks after treatment | |||
|
| ||||
| CR | PR | PD | ||
|
|
|
|
| |
| N0 – 19 | 19 (57.7) | 13 (68.4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| N(+) – 12 | 12 (36.3) | 9 (75) | 0 (0) | 3 (25) |
| Nx – 2 | 2 (6.1) | 1 (50) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
N0 without the involvement of lymph nodes
N (+) metastasis to the lymph system
Nx unknown status of the lymph nodes
Results of univariate Cox proportional hazards model in patients with cervical cancer
|
| death | live | Index β | β |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 53 | 26 | 27 | 0.0082 | 1.0083 | 0.5756 |
| Serum VEGF-C | 42 | 22 | 20 | 0.000444 | 1.0004 | 0.7442 |
| Lymphatic vessel density LMVD | 31 | 17 | 14 | –0.033726 | 0,966836 | 0.364187 |
| Leucocyte WBC | 52 | 25 | 27 | 0.091573 | 1.095896 | 0.227157 |
| Haemoglobin before treatment Hb | 52 | 25 | 27 | –0.263270 | 0.768534 | 0.008832 |
| Haemoglobin after treatment Hb | 53 | 26 | 27 | –0.211829 | 0.809103 | 0.057166 |
| Platelet count PLT | 53 | 26 | 27 | 0.002308 | 1.002311 | 0.187118 |
| Platelet count after treatment PLT | 51 | 24 | 27 | 0.004488 | 1.004498 | 0.000170 |
| Microvessel density MVD | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0.030219 | 1.030680 | 0.631832 |
In statistical analyses p < 0.05 (marked red) was taken as significant.
Fig. 1Estimated overall survival probablities in group of patients whithout lymph node metastasis vs. women with lymph node metastasis
Fig. 2Estimated overall survival probablities in group of patients FIGO stage I-II vs. patients with advanced disease
Fig. 3Estimated overall survival probablities in group of patients with operation vs. women without operation
Fig. 4Estimated overall survival probablities in group of patients < 145.7 pg/ml VEGF-C in serum vs. women with > 145.7 pg/ml VEGF-C in serum
Fig. 5Estimated overall survival probalities in group of patients with < 6.25 lymphatic vessel density (LMVD) vs. women with > 6.25 lymphatic vessel density (LMVD)