Literature DB >> 23788702

Physiological and behavioural effects of fruit toxins on seed-predating versus seed-dispersing congeneric rodents.

Michal Samuni-Blank1, Ido Izhaki, M Denise Dearing, William H Karasov, Yoram Gerchman, Kevin D Kohl, Petros Lymberakis, Patrice Kurnath, Zeev Arad.   

Abstract

Fleshy, ripe fruits attract seed dispersers but also seed predators. Although many fruit consumers (legitimate seed dispersers as well as seed predators) are clearly exposed to plant secondary compounds (PSCs), their impact on the consumers' physiology and foraging behaviour has been largely overlooked. Here, we document the divergent behavioural and physiological responses to fruit consumption of three congeneric rodent species in the Middle East, representing both seed dispersers and seed predators. The fruit pulp of the desert plant Ochradenus baccatus contains high concentrations of glucosinolates (GLSs). These GLSs are hydrolyzed into active toxic compounds upon contact with the myrosinase enzyme released from seeds crushed during fruit consumption. Acomys russatus and A. cahirinus share a desert habitat. Acomys russatus acts as an O. baccatus seed predator, and A. cahirinus circumvents the activation of the GLSs by orally expelling vital seeds. We found that between the three species examined, A. russatus was physiologically most tolerant to whole fruit consumption and even A. minous, which is evolutionarily naïve to O. baccatus, exhibits greater tolerance to whole fruit consumption than A. cahirinus. However, like A. cahirinus, A. minous may also behaviourally avoid the activation of the GLSs by making a hole in the pulp and consuming only the seeds. Our findings demonstrate that seed predators have a higher physiological tolerance than seed dispersers when consuming fruits containing toxic PSCs. The findings also demonstrate the extreme ecological/evolutionary lability of this plant-animal symbiosis to shift from predation to mutualism and vice versa.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acomys; alanine aminotransferase; bitter taste; body mass; fruits; glucosinolates; liver; pulp; secondary compounds; seeds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23788702     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.089664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  3 in total

1.  The pathophysiology of survival in harsh environments.

Authors:  I Schoepf; N Pillay; C Schradin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 2.  Plant Secondary Metabolites as Rodent Repellents: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sabine C Hansen; Caroline Stolter; Christian Imholt; Jens Jacob
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Taste and physiological responses to glucosinolates: seed predator versus seed disperser.

Authors:  Michal Samuni-Blank; Ido Izhaki; Yoram Gerchman; M Denise Dearing; William H Karasov; Beny Trabelcy; Thea M Edwards; Zeev Arad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.