Literature DB >> 23788218

Prevention of depression with escitalopram in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

William M Lydiatt1, Diane Bessette, Kendra K Schmid, Harlan Sayles, William J Burke.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Major depressive disorder develops in up to half the patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer, resulting in significant morbidity; therefore, preventing depression during cancer treatment may be of great benefit.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prophylactic use of the antidepressant escitalopram oxalate would decrease the incidence of depression in patients receiving primary therapy for head and neck cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram vs placebo was conducted in a group of nondepressed patients diagnosed as having head and neck cancer who were about to enter cancer treatment. Patients were stratified by sex, site, stage (early vs advanced), and primary modality of treatment (radiation vs surgery). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was the number of participants who developed moderate or greater depression (scores on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology-Self Rated of ≥11).
RESULTS: From January 6, 2008, to December 28, 2011, 148 patients were randomized. Significantly fewer patients receiving escitalopram developed depression (24.6% in the placebo group vs 10.0% in the escitalopram group; stratified log-rank test, P = .04). A Cox proportional hazards regression model compared the 2 treatment groups after controlling for age, baseline smoking status, and stratification variables. The hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% CI, 0.14-0.96) demonstrated an advantage of escitalopram (P = .04). Patients undergoing radiotherapy as the initial modality were significantly more likely to develop depression than those undergoing surgery (radiotherapy compared with surgery group; hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.38-9.40; P = .009). Patients in the escitalopram group who completed the study and were not depressed rated their overall quality of life as significantly better for 3 consecutive months after cessation of drug use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In nondepressed patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer, prophylactic escitalopram reduced the risk of developing depression by more than 50%. In nondepressed patients who completed the trial, quality of life was also significantly better for 3 consecutive months after cessation of drug use in the escitalopram group. These findings have important implications for the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00536172.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23788218     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.3371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  21 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Body Image Disturbance in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Mark A Ellis; Katherine R Sterba; Emily A Brennan; Stacey Maurer; Elizabeth G Hill; Terry A Day; Evan M Graboyes
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 2.  Psychopharmacology in cancer.

Authors:  Seema M Thekdi; Antolin Trinidad; Andrew Roth
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  The humanistic burden of head and neck cancer: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Erika Wissinger; Ingolf Griebsch; Juliane Lungershausen; Michael Byrnes; Karin Travers; Chris L Pashos
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Outcomes measurement in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Christine G Gourin
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 5.  Sick and tired: mood, fatigue, and inflammation in cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kruse; Thomas B Strouse
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 6.  Psychosocial Issues in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: an Updated Review with a Focus on Clinical Interventions.

Authors:  Joshua D Smith; Andrew G Shuman; Michelle B Riba
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Identification of Baseline Characteristics Associated With Development of Depression Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Aru Panwar; Katherine Rieke; William J Burke; Harlan Sayles; William M Lydiatt
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 8.  The current state of the neurogenic theory of depression and anxiety.

Authors:  Bradley R Miller; René Hen
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Insula thickness asymmetry relates to risk of major depressive disorder in middle-aged to older adults.

Authors:  Erin C Jones; Spencer W Liebel; Emily S Hallowell; Lawrence H Sweet
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 2.376

10.  Association of Head and Neck Cancer With Mental Health Disorders in a Large Insurance Claims Database.

Authors:  Ji Hyae Lee; Djibril Ba; Guodong Liu; Douglas Leslie; Brad E Zacharia; Neerav Goyal
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.