Literature DB >> 23787405

Bioavailability of iron in geophagic earths and clay minerals, and their effect on dietary iron absorption using an in vitro digestion/Caco-2 cell model.

Gretchen L Seim1, Cedric I Ahn, Mary S Bodis, Flavia Luwedde, Dennis D Miller, Stephen Hillier, Elad Tako, Raymond P Glahn, Sera L Young.   

Abstract

Geophagy, the deliberate consumption of earth, is strongly associated with iron (Fe) deficiency. It has been proposed that geophagy may be practiced as a means to improve Fe status by increasing Fe intakes and, conversely, that geophagy may cause Fe deficiency by inhibiting Fe absorption. We tested these hypotheses by measuring Fe concentration and relative bioavailable Fe content of 12 samples of geophagic earth and 4 samples of pure clay minerals. Further, we assessed the impact of these samples on the bioavailability of Fe from an Fe-rich test meal (cooked white beans, WB). Fe concentrations were measured with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Fe bioavailability was determined using an in vitro digestion/Caco-2 cell model in which ferritin formation was used as an index of Fe bioavailability. Geophagic earth and clay mineral samples were evaluated with this model, both alone and in combination with WB (1 : 16 ratio, sample : WB). Median Fe concentration of the geophagic earth was 3485 (IQR 2462, 14 ,571) μg g⁻¹ and mean Fe concentration in the clay minerals was 2791 (±1782) μg g⁻¹. All specimens had Fe concentrations significantly higher (p ≤ 0.005) than the Fe concentration of WB (77 μg g⁻¹). Ferritin formation (i.e. Fe uptake) in cells exposed to geophagic earths and clay minerals was significantly lower than in cells exposed to WB (p ≤ 0.05) and Fe uptake responses of 11 of the 16 samples were not significantly different from the blank, indicating no bioavailable Fe. When samples were combined with WB, 5 of 16 had mean ferritin levels that were significantly lower (p ≤ 0.05, one tail) than the WB alone, indicating that the samples inhibited Fe uptake from the WB. None of the ferritin responses of cells exposed to both WB and earth/clay were significantly higher than WB alone. Thus, although geophagic earths and mineral clays are high in total Fe, very little of this Fe is bioavailable. Further, some geophagic earth and clay mineral samples inhibit Fe absorption from foods. In vivo research is warranted to confirm these observations and to determine if geophagic earth samples can be a source of Fe and/or inhibit Fe absorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23787405      PMCID: PMC4033299          DOI: 10.1039/c3fo30380b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Funct        ISSN: 2042-6496            Impact factor:   5.396


  33 in total

Review 1.  Pica in pregnancy: new ideas about an old condition.

Authors:  Sera L Young
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 2.  Why on earth?: Evaluating hypotheses about the physiological functions of human geophagy.

Authors:  Sera L Young; Paul W Sherman; Julius B Lucks; Gretel H Pelto
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.875

3.  White beans provide more bioavailable iron than red beans: studies in poultry (Gallus gallus) and an in vitro digestion/Caco-2 model.

Authors:  Elad Tako; Raymond P Glahn
Journal:  Int J Vitam Nutr Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.784

4.  Geophagy (Soil-eating) in relation to Anemia and Helminth infection among HIV-infected pregnant women in Tanzania.

Authors:  Kosuke Kawai; Elmar Saathoff; Gretchen Antelman; Gernard Msamanga; Wafaie W Fawzi
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Biofortified black beans in a maize and bean diet provide more bioavailable iron to piglets than standard black beans.

Authors:  Elad Tako; J Moises Laparra; Raymond P Glahn; Ross M Welch; Xin Gen Lei; Steve Beebe; Dennis D Miller
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Intake of alcoholic beverages is a predictor of iron status and hemoglobin in adult Tanzanians.

Authors:  Wabyahe Malenganisho; Pascal Magnussen; Birgitte Jyding Vennervald; Henrik Krarup; Pernille Kaestel; Julius Siza; Godfrey Kaatano; Mansuet Temu; Henrik Friis
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Screening of iron bioavailability patterns in eight bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes using the Caco-2 cell in vitro model.

Authors:  Magnolia Ariza-Nieto; Matthew W Blair; Ross M Welch; Raymond P Glahn
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  Iron and zinc bioavailabilities to pigs from red and white beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) are similar.

Authors:  Elad Tako; Raymond P Glahn; Jose M Laparra; Ross M Welch; Xingen Lei; James D Kelly; Mike A Rutzke; Dennis D Miller
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 5.279

9.  Biofortified red mottled beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in a maize and bean diet provide more bioavailable iron than standard red mottled beans: studies in poultry (Gallus gallus) and an in vitro digestion/Caco-2 model.

Authors:  Elad Tako; Matthew W Blair; Raymond P Glahn
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Differences and commonalities in physical, chemical and mineralogical properties of Zanzibari geophagic soils.

Authors:  Sera L Young; M Jeffrey Wilson; Stephen Hillier; Evelyne Delbos; Said M Ali; Rebecca J Stoltzfus
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  9 in total

1.  Geophagy among East African Chimpanzees: consumed soils provide protection from plant secondary compounds and bioavailable iron.

Authors:  Paula A Pebsworth; Stephen Hillier; Renate Wendler; Ray Glahn; Chieu Anh Kim Ta; John T Arnason; Sera L Young
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 2.  Comprehensive Review on the Interactions of Clay Minerals With Animal Physiology and Production.

Authors:  Anna Damato; Fabio Vianello; Enrico Novelli; Stefania Balzan; Matteo Gianesella; Elisa Giaretta; Gianfranco Gabai
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-10

3.  Geophagic earths consumed by women in western Kenya contain dangerous levels of lead, arsenic, and iron.

Authors:  Joshua D Miller; Shalean M Collins; Moshood Omotayo; Stephanie L Martin; Katherine L Dickin; Sera L Young
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 1.937

4.  Geophagy in Northern Uganda: Perspectives from Consumers and Clinicians.

Authors:  Lena Huebl; Stephan Leick; Lukas Guettl; Grace Akello; Ruth Kutalek
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  A Novel in Vivo Model for Assessing the Impact of Geophagic Earth on Iron Status.

Authors:  Gretchen L Seim; Elad Tako; Cedric Ahn; Raymond P Glahn; Sera L Young
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Iron-deficiency anemia with lithobezoar (pica): a rare cause of intestinal obstruction in a 5-year-old Nigerian child.

Authors:  Olayinka R Ibrahim; Abubakar S Lugga; Nuraddeen Ibrahim; Lawal M Ibrahim; Bello M Suleiman
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2018-09-17

7.  High prevalence of kaolin consumption in migrant women living in a major urban area of France: A cross-sectional investigation.

Authors:  Pascal Caillet; Maud Poirier; Marie Grall-Bronnec; Edouard Marchal; Alain Pineau; Catherine Pintas; Véronique Carton; Pascale Jolliet; Norbert Winer; Caroline Victorri-Vigneau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Potential adverse effects on animal health and performance caused by the addition of mineral adsorbents to feeds to reduce mycotoxin exposure.

Authors:  Christopher T Elliott; Lisa Connolly; Oluwatobi Kolawole
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.833

9.  A Comparative Analyses of Granulometry, Mineral Composition and Major and Trace Element Concentrations in Soils Commonly Ingested by Humans.

Authors:  Veronica M Ngole-Jeme; Georges-Ivo E Ekosse
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.