Friederike Mackensen1, Eva Jakob2, Christina Springer3, Bianca C Dobner2, Ute Wiehler3, Petra Weimer3, Klaus Rohrschneider3, Christoph Fiehn4, Regina Max4, Brigitte Storch-Hagenlocher5, Matthias D Becker2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Interdisciplinary Uveitis Center, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: mackensen@uveitiszentrum.de. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Interdisciplinary Uveitis Center, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Interdisciplinary Uveitis Center, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare interferon (IFN) beta with methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of intermediate uveitis with macular edema. DESIGN: Monocentric, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING:Specialized uveitis center at the University of Heidelberg. PATIENT OR STUDY POPULATION: Patients with either primary intermediate uveitis or uveitis associated with multiple sclerosis. MAIN INCLUSION CRITERIA: Visual acuity of 20/30 or worse (0.2 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) and macular edema of more than 250 μm (central 1-mm in optical coherence tomography; Stratus). Randomization into either IFN beta 44 μg subcutaneously 3 times weekly or 20 mg MTX subcutaneously once weekly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 3 months, the primary outcome parameter of mean change in visual acuity was evaluated and efficacy was determined. Secondary parameters were macular edema by optical coherence tomography, inflammatory activity, and retinal sensitivity by microperimetry (MP-1; Nidek). In case of treatment failure, switching to the other treatment arm was possible. RESULTS:Nineteen patients were included. Ten were randomized to MTX, and 9 were randomized to IFN beta. At 3 months, visual acuity improved a mean 0.31 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (range, -0.02 to -0.96, 15.6 letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart) in the IFN beta group versus a mean 0.09 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (range, 0.12 to -0.38, 4.7 letters) in the MTX arm (P = .0435, Mann-Whitney U test). Macular thickness decreased by a mean of 206 μm (range, -41 to -416 μm) in the IFN arm, but increased by 47 μm (range, 108 to -28 μm) in the MTX group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample size is small, results of the trial support superiority of IFN beta over MTX in the treatment of macular edema in the setting of intermediate uveitis.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare interferon (IFN) beta with methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of intermediate uveitis with macular edema. DESIGN: Monocentric, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Specialized uveitis center at the University of Heidelberg. PATIENT OR STUDY POPULATION: Patients with either primary intermediate uveitis or uveitis associated with multiple sclerosis. MAIN INCLUSION CRITERIA: Visual acuity of 20/30 or worse (0.2 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) and macular edema of more than 250 μm (central 1-mm in optical coherence tomography; Stratus). Randomization into either IFN beta 44 μg subcutaneously 3 times weekly or 20 mg MTX subcutaneously once weekly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 3 months, the primary outcome parameter of mean change in visual acuity was evaluated and efficacy was determined. Secondary parameters were macular edema by optical coherence tomography, inflammatory activity, and retinal sensitivity by microperimetry (MP-1; Nidek). In case of treatment failure, switching to the other treatment arm was possible. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included. Ten were randomized to MTX, and 9 were randomized to IFN beta. At 3 months, visual acuity improved a mean 0.31 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (range, -0.02 to -0.96, 15.6 letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart) in the IFN beta group versus a mean 0.09 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (range, 0.12 to -0.38, 4.7 letters) in the MTX arm (P = .0435, Mann-Whitney U test). Macular thickness decreased by a mean of 206 μm (range, -41 to -416 μm) in the IFN arm, but increased by 47 μm (range, 108 to -28 μm) in the MTX group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample size is small, results of the trial support superiority of IFN beta over MTX in the treatment of macular edema in the setting of intermediate uveitis.
Authors: Sivakumar R Rathinam; Manohar Babu; Radhika Thundikandy; Anuradha Kanakath; Natalie Nardone; Elizabeth Esterberg; Salena M Lee; Wayne T A Enanoria; Travis C Porco; Erica N Browne; Rachel Weinrib; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-06-07 Impact factor: 12.079