OBJECTIVE: The association between parity and type-II diabetes has been studied primarily in Western populations, and the findings have been inconsistent. Here, we examine whether parity was positively associated with incident type-II diabetes in Singaporean Chinese women. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Singapore. POPULATION: A total of 25,021 Singaporean Chinese women aged 45-74 years from the Singapore Chinese Health Study who were free of cancer, heart disease, stroke, and diabetes at baseline (1993-1998). METHODS: Women were followed through 2004 for incident diabetes. Hazard ratios for type-II diabetes were computed across parity (of live births) categories and adjusted for baseline age, interview year, dialect, education, smoking, dietary pattern, physical activity, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, menopausal status, hormone therapy use, and body mass index (BMI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported diabetes, as diagnosed by a doctor. RESULTS: Over an average of 5.7 person-years of follow-up, 1294 women were diagnosed with diabetes. Before and after multivariable adjustment there was a positive graded association between parity and type-II diabetes risk (P < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model, which included adult BMI, the risk of type-II diabetes increased by 31% (from -2 to 76%), 62% (from 22 to 116%), and 74% (from 29 to 133%) for women with one or two, three or four, and five or more live births, respectively, compared with women with no live births. Moreover, in a supplementary multivariate analysis in non-diabetic women we found a positive monotonic association between parity and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increased parity may be a risk factor for type-II diabetes in Chinese women. More research is needed on lifestyle and physiologic factors that may explain this association.
OBJECTIVE: The association between parity and type-II diabetes has been studied primarily in Western populations, and the findings have been inconsistent. Here, we examine whether parity was positively associated with incident type-II diabetes in Singaporean Chinese women. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Singapore. POPULATION: A total of 25,021 Singaporean Chinese women aged 45-74 years from the Singapore Chinese Health Study who were free of cancer, heart disease, stroke, and diabetes at baseline (1993-1998). METHODS:Women were followed through 2004 for incident diabetes. Hazard ratios for type-II diabetes were computed across parity (of live births) categories and adjusted for baseline age, interview year, dialect, education, smoking, dietary pattern, physical activity, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, menopausal status, hormone therapy use, and body mass index (BMI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported diabetes, as diagnosed by a doctor. RESULTS: Over an average of 5.7 person-years of follow-up, 1294 women were diagnosed with diabetes. Before and after multivariable adjustment there was a positive graded association between parity and type-II diabetes risk (P < 0.001). In the fully adjusted model, which included adult BMI, the risk of type-II diabetes increased by 31% (from -2 to 76%), 62% (from 22 to 116%), and 74% (from 29 to 133%) for women with one or two, three or four, and five or more live births, respectively, compared with women with no live births. Moreover, in a supplementary multivariate analysis in non-diabeticwomen we found a positive monotonic association between parity and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increased parity may be a risk factor for type-II diabetes in Chinese women. More research is needed on lifestyle and physiologic factors that may explain this association.
Authors: Anthony J G Hanley; Gail McKeown-Eyssen; Stewart B Harris; Robert A Hegele; Thomas M S Wolever; Jeremy Kwan; Bernard Zinman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Debbie A Lawlor; Jonathan R Emberson; Shah Ebrahim; Peter H Whincup; S Goya Wannamethee; Mary Walker; George Davey Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-03-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J E Manson; E B Rimm; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett; R A Arky; B Rosner; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: Am J Med Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: William C Knowler; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; John M Lachin; Elizabeth A Walker; David M Nathan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Deirdre K Tobias; Audrey J Gaskins; Stacey A Missmer; Frank B Hu; JoAnn E Manson; Germaine M Buck Louis; Cuilin Zhang; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-01-18 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Cristiano S Gomes; Catherine M Pirkle; Juliana F S Barbosa; Afshin Vafaei; Saionara M A Câmara; Ricardo O Guerra Journal: J Cross Cult Gerontol Date: 2018-12
Authors: Catherine M Pirkle; Ana Carolina Patrício de Albuquerque Sousa; Beatriz Alvarado; Maria-Victoria Zunzunegui Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 3.295