BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire (MSWDQ) is a recently developed, internally consistent and valid 50-item measure of self-reported workplace difficulties in pwMS. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the second-order factor structure of the MSWDQ was assessed, with the aim of developing a short version of the scale. METHODS: Cross-sectional MSWDQ data were obtained along with employment and MS disease information, in a community-based sample of 189 pwMS. Final items for the shortened version were selected to ensure both item breadth and adequacy of psychometric properties. RESULTS: Confirmatory Factor Analysis on the 12 MSWDQ factors yielded a model comprised of three second-order factors termed physical barriers, psychological/cognitive barriers and external barriers, which formed the basis of the shorter 23-item scale, the MSWDQ-23. The MSWDQ-23 showed excellent subscale internal consistencies. It explained 29% of the variance in reduced work hours since diagnosis, 22% of the variance in expectations of withdrawing from work, 24% of the variance in expectations of reduced work hours and 32% of the variance in expectations of changing type of work due to MS. CONCLUSION: The MSWDQ-23 is a brief valid and internally consistent measure of workplace difficulties that can predict both employment outcomes and expectations in pwMS. It is an especially useful tool for clinicians who wish to quickly obtain an indication of the extent of psychological/cognitive, physical and/or external difficulties experienced by individual pwMS in the workplace. Implications for Rehabilitation The MSWDQ-23 is a shortened self-report survey that examines work difficulties in people with MS across three broad domains: psychological/cognitive barriers, physical barriers and external barriers. The MSWDQ-23 is a valid and reliable measure that is capable of predicting various employment outcomes and expectations.
BACKGROUND: The Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire (MSWDQ) is a recently developed, internally consistent and valid 50-item measure of self-reported workplace difficulties in pwMS. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the second-order factor structure of the MSWDQ was assessed, with the aim of developing a short version of the scale. METHODS: Cross-sectional MSWDQ data were obtained along with employment and MS disease information, in a community-based sample of 189 pwMS. Final items for the shortened version were selected to ensure both item breadth and adequacy of psychometric properties. RESULTS: Confirmatory Factor Analysis on the 12 MSWDQ factors yielded a model comprised of three second-order factors termed physical barriers, psychological/cognitive barriers and external barriers, which formed the basis of the shorter 23-item scale, the MSWDQ-23. The MSWDQ-23 showed excellent subscale internal consistencies. It explained 29% of the variance in reduced work hours since diagnosis, 22% of the variance in expectations of withdrawing from work, 24% of the variance in expectations of reduced work hours and 32% of the variance in expectations of changing type of work due to MS. CONCLUSION: The MSWDQ-23 is a brief valid and internally consistent measure of workplace difficulties that can predict both employment outcomes and expectations in pwMS. It is an especially useful tool for clinicians who wish to quickly obtain an indication of the extent of psychological/cognitive, physical and/or external difficulties experienced by individual pwMS in the workplace. Implications for Rehabilitation The MSWDQ-23 is a shortened self-report survey that examines work difficulties in people with MS across three broad domains: psychological/cognitive barriers, physical barriers and external barriers. The MSWDQ-23 is a valid and reliable measure that is capable of predicting various employment outcomes and expectations.
Authors: Tom A Fuchs; Michael G Jaworski; Margaret Youngs; Omar Abdel-Kerim; Curtis Wojcik; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Ralph H B Benedict Journal: Int J MS Care Date: 2021-07-09
Authors: Gogem Topcu; Laura Smith; Jacqueline R Mhizha-Murira; Nia Goulden; Zoë Hoare; Avril Drummond; Deborah Fitzsimmons; Nikos Evangelou; Klaus Schmierer; Emma C Tallantyre; Paul Leighton; Kimberley Allen-Philbey; Andrea Stennett; Paul Bradley; Clare Bale; James Turton; Roshan das Nair Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2022-06-11
Authors: Anja I Lehmann; Stephanie Rodgers; Christian P Kamm; Mathias Mettler; Nina Steinemann; Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross; Marco Kaufmann; Jürg Kesselring; Pasquale Calabrese; Anke Salmen; Claudio Gobbi; Chiara Zecca; Georg F Bauer; Viktor von Wyl Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: José E Meca-Lallana; Rocío Gómez-Ballesteros; Francisco Pérez-Miralles; Lucía Forero; María Sepúlveda; Carmen Calles; María L Martínez-Ginés; Inés González-Suárez; Sabas Boyero; Lucía Romero-Pinel; Ángel P Sempere; Virginia Meca-Lallana; Luis Querol; Lucienne Costa-Frossard; Daniel Prefasi; Jorge Maurino Journal: Neurol Ther Date: 2022-05-06
Authors: Bruno Kusznir Vitturi; Alborz Rahmani; Guglielmo Dini; Alfredo Montecucco; Nicoletta Debarbieri; Paolo Bandiera; Michela Ponzio; Mario Alberto Battaglia; Benedetta Persechino; Matilde Inglese; Paolo Durando Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Eea van Egmond; K van der Hiele; Dam van Gorp; P J Jongen; Jjl van der Klink; M F Reneman; Eac Beenakker; Jjj van Eijk; Stfm Frequin; K de Gans; B M van Geel; Ohh Gerlach; Gjd Hengstman; J P Mostert; Wim Verhagen; Ham Middelkoop; L H Visser Journal: Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Date: 2022-09-04