Literature DB >> 23785568

Airborne infection control in healthcare settings.

Saurabh R Shrivastava1, Prateek S Shrivastava, Jegadeesh Ramasamy.   

Abstract

Exposure of human beings to different airborne pathogens has resulted in the emergence of epidemics of respiratory infections. This airborne transmission becomes even more prevalent in healthcare settings because of overburdened hospitals and the presence of immunosuppressed patients. Airborne infection control measures include a three-pronged approach, namely administrative control, environmental control, and personal respiratory protection measures. To conclude, need of the hour is to assess the true contribution of airborne transmission to infection rates so that hospital administrators can implement appropriate control measures to keep respiratory infections under check.

Entities:  

Keywords:  air change; airborne; infection; nosocomial

Year:  2013        PMID: 23785568      PMCID: PMC3683632          DOI: 10.3402/iee.v3i0.21411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol        ISSN: 2000-8686


Exposure of human beings to different airborne pathogens has resulted in the emergence of epidemics of respiratory infections (1). Most of the microorganisms released from infectious patients can disperse in a wide geographical area by air currents and finally can be inhaled by susceptible individuals who have had no direct contact with the primary source (2). This airborne transmission becomes even more prevalent in healthcare settings because of overburdened hospitals and the presence of immunosuppressed patients (3). World Health Organization, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and International Union of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease have released guidelines regarding the control of airborne infection in both developed and developing nations (4). The suggested measures include a three-pronged approach, namely administrative control, environmental control, and personal respiratory protection measures (4, 5). The rationale for implementing administrative control measures is to minimize potential opportunities of exposure of susceptible individuals to infectious patients. Administrative control measures include education and training of staff (i.e., principles and practices of infection control/clear roles and responsibilities of different cadres of healthcare staff); outpatient department measures (i.e., screening of patients for respiratory complaints/information – education – communication for promoting cough etiquette by the patients/segregation of respiratory symptomatic in a separate well – ventilated waiting area/fast – tracking of respiratory symptomatic/seating arrangement of doctor and patients); and inpatient department measures (i.e., minimizing hospitalization of patients/reduction of nosocomial infections/educating patients and attendants about cough hygiene/routine segregation of patients to separate infectious wards or separate areas in same ward/maintain spacing by ward decompression/advocating safe sputum collection) (4, 5). Environmental control measures are recommended mainly for reduction in concentration of infectious particles, which are usually present in the healthcare settings. It comprises indoor patient segregation and bed spacing; ensuring effective ventilation at all times and in all seasons; and giving special attention to high-risk areas, such as anti-retroviral therapy centers, outpatient and inpatient departments, bronchoscopy procedure rooms, and multidrug resistant tuberculosis wards. Strategies like natural ventilation, mechanical ventilation, air changes per hour (a measure of how many times the air within a defined space is replaced per hour), and upper room ultraviolet light have been proposed to ensure adequate ventilation (4, 6). By promoting personal respiratory protection among the patients and healthcare staff, there is a reduction in risk to other staff and patients. Finding of a study has revealed that multi-sectoral approach should be advocated instead of an individual approach for optimal control of droplets present in the aerosol expelled while coughing (5, 7). To conclude, airborne transmission of infectious disease is a major public health concern. Need of the hour is to assess the true contribution of airborne transmission to infection rates so that hospital administrators can implement appropriate control measures to keep respiratory infections under check.
  5 in total

1.  Measurement of airborne influenza virus in a hospital emergency department.

Authors:  Francoise M Blachere; William G Lindsley; Terri A Pearce; Stacey E Anderson; Melanie Fisher; Rashida Khakoo; Barbara J Meade; Owen Lander; Stephen Davis; Robert E Thewlis; Ismail Celik; Bean T Chen; Donald H Beezhold
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Cough aerosol in healthy participants: fundamental knowledge to optimize droplet-spread infectious respiratory disease management.

Authors:  Gustavo Zayas; Ming C Chiang; Eric Wong; Fred MacDonald; Carlos F Lange; Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan; Malcolm King
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.317

Review 3.  2,500-year evolution of the term epidemic.

Authors:  Paul M V Martin; Estelle Martin-Granel
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Natural ventilation for the prevention of airborne contagion.

Authors:  A Roderick Escombe; Clarissa C Oeser; Robert H Gilman; Marcos Navincopa; Eduardo Ticona; William Pan; Carlos Martínez; Jesus Chacaltana; Richard Rodríguez; David A J Moore; Jon S Friedland; Carlton A Evans
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 5.  Airborne infectious disease and the suppression of pulmonary bioaerosols.

Authors:  Jennifer Fiegel; Robert Clarke; David A Edwards
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.851

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of air purifier on efficient removal of airborne bacteria, Staphylococcus epidermidis, using single-chamber method.

Authors:  Jung Hoon Lee; Jeong Yup Kim; Bo-Bae Cho; J R Anusha; Ju Yong Sim; C Justin Raj; Kook-Hyun Yu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Assessment of Health Facilities for Airborne Infection Control Practices and Adherence to National Airborne Infection Control Guidelines: A Study from Kerala, Southern India.

Authors:  Arun Raj; Devraj Ramakrishnan; Carmel Regeela Mainu Thekkeveettil Thomas; Amrita Das Mavila; Midhun Rajiv; Rakesh Purushothama Bhat Suseela
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2019-10

3.  The Risk Status of Waiting Areas for Airborne Infection Control in Delhi Hospitals.

Authors:  Raja Singh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-16

4.  Implementation status of national airborne infection control guidelines in the health care facilities of a North Indian State: A mixed method study.

Authors:  Pallvi Kaushal; Garima Sangwan; Kirtan Rana; Manisha Biswal; Manmeet Kaur; P V M Lakshmi
Journal:  Public Health Pract (Oxf)       Date:  2021-06-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.