D Vogel1, C Spiel, M Schmid, M Stöger-Pollach, R Schlögl, Y Suchorski, G Rupprechter. 1. Institute of Materials Chemistry, Institute of Applied Physics, and University Service Center for Transmission Electron Microscopy, Vienna University of Technology , Vienna, Austria ; Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
The role of artificially created defects and steps in the local reaction kinetics of CO oxidation on the individual domains of a polycrystalline Pd foil was studied by photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM), mass spectroscopy (MS), and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). The defects and steps were created by STM-controlled Ar+ sputtering and the novel PEEM-based approach allowed the simultaneous determination of local kinetic phase transitions on differently oriented μm-sized grains of a polycrystalline sample. The independent (single-crystal-like) reaction behavior of the individual Pd(hkl) domains in the 10-5 mbar pressure range changes upon Ar+ sputtering to a correlated reaction behavior, and the reaction fronts propagate unhindered across the grain boundaries. The defect-rich surface shows also a significantly higher CO tolerance as reflected by the shift of both the global (MS-measured) and the local (PEEM-measured) kinetic diagrams toward higher CO pressure.
The role of artificially created defects and steps in the local reaction kinetics of CO oxidation on the individual domains of a polycrystalline Pd foil was studied by photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM), mass spectroscopy (MS), and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). The defects and steps were created by STM-controlled Ar+ sputtering and the novel PEEM-based approach allowed the simultaneous determination of local kinetic phase transitions on differently oriented μm-sized grains of a polycrystalline sample. The independent (single-crystal-like) reaction behavior of the individual Pd(hkl) domains in the 10-5 mbar pressure range changes upon Ar+ sputtering to a correlated reaction behavior, and the reaction fronts propagate unhindered across the grain boundaries. The defect-rich surface shows also a significantly higher CO tolerance as reflected by the shift of both the global (MS-measured) and the local (PEEM-measured) kinetic diagrams toward higher CO pressure.
The structure dependence of the reaction rates and the selectivity
of heterogeneously catalyzed reactions, as well as the related identification
of catalytically “active sites”, are among the most
discussed topics since the early days of catalysis.[1,2] Atomic
steps and surface defects are often considered to be crucial for heterogeneous
catalysis,[3−6] since these particular active sites strengthen the reactant-surface
binding[7] and thus also facilitate bond
formation and breaking.[8]With respect to the CO oxidation reaction on platinum-group metal
surfaces, structure sensitivity has been mainly studied by comparing
the reaction kinetics on differently structured single crystal surfaces,
measured in independent experiments.[9−12] Despite the obvious drawbacks
of such measurements caused by the difficulties to keep the conditions
and control parameters exactly the same in separate experiments, important
findings, for example, for Pd surfaces, such as significant differences
of the CO coverage on differently oriented planes under identical
experimental conditions,[9] high structure
sensitivity at low coverages, and low sensitivity to the surface orientation
at medium or high coverages,[10] and significant
dependence of the rate of CO oxidation on the structure-dependent
oxygen bond energy were obtained.[11]For studying the role of atomic steps and defects, basically two
types of approaches are usually utilized: (i) either the reaction
is studied on vicinal surfaces exhibiting regular steps such as Pt(335)[13] and Pt(332)[14] or
(ii) the surface steps and defect sites are intentionally created,
for example, by sputtering or laser radiation.[15] Ar+ ion sputtering is a suitable method to create
artificial roughness, since the energy of Ar+ ions, the
Ar+ ion dose, and the temperature during sputtering allow
a flexible variation of the surface topography. For example, the artificial
creation of defects by Ar+ ion sputtering on a Rh surfaceoxide grown on Rh(111) significantly increased the number of nuclei
for oxide reduction by H2 (i.e., reduction was facilitated
by roughness).[16] Nevertheless, if the effect
of ion bombardment of various low-index surfaces is examined in separate
experiments, the problem of experimental deviations remains.Recently, we have developed a photoemission electron microscopy
(PEEM)-based approach that allows one to study the local reaction
kinetics of CO oxidation in situ on individual differently
oriented micrometer-sized grains of a polycrystallinemetal foil.[17−19] Owing to the parallel imaging principle of PEEM, the local kinetic
information is obtained simultaneously for all micrograins in the
field of view (ca. 500 μm) under exactly the same conditions.
If this is extended to the case of Ar+ ion sputtering,
all domains of the polycrystalline sample surface are subject to identical
ion impact, and the parallel analyzing method PEEM thus provides a
possibility to compare the local kinetics of differently oriented,
but similarly Ar+-“modified” surfaces.In the present contribution we exploit this possibility, applying
digital analysis of PEEM video-sequences recorded in situ during the CO oxidation reaction to obtain local kinetic information
from the smooth (sputtered and annealed) and atomically rough (additionally
sputtered) surface of individual Pd(hkl) domains
of a polycrystalline Pd foil. The degree of the surface modification
caused by Ar+ ion impact was estimated by scanning tunneling
microscopy (STM) and the global (average) kinetics of the CO oxidation
reaction was monitored by mass spectroscopy (MS).
Experimental Section
The experiments were performed in a ultra-high-vacuum (UHV) system
consisting of two independently operated chambers connected with each
other by a sample transfer line, thus allowing a common reactive gas
atmosphere in the 10–4 to 10–9 mbar range. The “microscopy” chamber is equipped with
a photoemission electron microscope (PEEM, Staib instruments), a quadrupole
mass spectrometer (QMS, MKS instruments), a LEED system (Omicron),
a high purity gas supply system (O2: 99.999%, CO: 99.97%)
and sample preparation facilities for cleaning the sample by argon
ion sputtering and annealing. The ‘‘spectroscopy’’
chamber is equipped with an XPS-system (Phoibos 100 hemispherical
energy analyzer and XR 50 twin anode X-ray source, SPECS). The details
of the experimental setup are described elsewhere.[20]The investigated sample was a polycrystalline Pd foil (AlfaAesar,
99.9% purity) which consisted of 50–100 μm large grains
of different crystallographic orientation formed after heating the
sample for several hours at 1100 K in UHV. A standard UHV cleaning
procedure, namely Ar+ ion sputtering (Ar pressure 10–5 mbar, Ekin = 1 keV),
annealing at 1073 K and subsequent heating at 523 K in 5 × 10–7 mbar oxygen atmosphere, was performed before each
measurement. The sample temperature was measured by a NiCr/Ni thermocouple
spot-welded to the front side of the Pd sample.The idea of the experimental approach is illustrated in Figure 1. The global CO2 formation rate in the
CO oxidation reaction, originating from all grains of the Pd foil
(Figure 1a), is monitored by QMS yielding the global reaction kinetics of this reaction on the whole sample
(Figure 1b). Simultaneously, PEEM is applied
to visualize the reaction in situ. The contrast of
a PEEM image which is formed by photoelectrons, emitted from the surface
upon UV light illumination, is attributed to the local work function
variations across the sample. These variations are sufficient to monitor
the CO oxidation reaction. The digital analysis of the recorded video
sequences allows one to follow the reaction on the individual grains
of the polycrystalline sample and to obtain local kinetic transitions on specific domains (Figure 1c).
Figure 1
Scheme of the experiment. (a) PEEM image of the polycrystalline
Pd sample during the CO oxidation reaction (T = 449
K, pCO = 1.4 × 10–5 mbar, pO2 = 1.3 × 10–5 mbar). (b) Global hysteresis in the overall CO2 reaction
rate measured during a cycle of CO pressure variation at constant T = 449 K and pO2 = 1.3 ×
10–5 mbar by MS for the whole sample. (c) Local
hysteresis as obtained from a corresponding PEEM video sequence for
the Pd(110) domain indicated in part a; acquired simultaneously with
the MS-measurement in part b.
Scheme of the experiment. (a) PEEM image of the polycrystallinePd sample during the CO oxidation reaction (T = 449
K, pCO = 1.4 × 10–5 mbar, pO2 = 1.3 × 10–5 mbar). (b) Global hysteresis in the overall CO2 reaction
rate measured during a cycle of CO pressure variation at constant T = 449 K and pO2 = 1.3 ×
10–5 mbar by MS for the whole sample. (c) Local
hysteresis as obtained from a corresponding PEEM video sequence for
the Pd(110) domain indicated in part a; acquired simultaneously with
the MS-measurement in part b.The identification of different grains of a Pd foil by local PEEM
image contrast is a challenging task because of the rather small work-function
differences of individual orientations. Therefore, electron backscatter
diffraction (EBSD) has been applied to determine the crystallographic
orientation of the individual grains and to confirm the orientation
of those low index facets which was primarily determined by work function
analysis by PEEM.Particular attention was paid to the possibility of palladium oxide
formation during the CO oxidation: the possibility to keep a common
reactive gas atmosphere in the PEEM- and the XPS-chamber allowed us
to perform XPS-measurements under the conditions of the CO oxidation
reaction (in the 10–5 mbar pressure range). We have
not observed any formation of a palladium bulk or surfaceoxide under
the present conditions.EBSD measurements have been carried out independently in a scanning
electron microscope (FEI, Quanta 200F) equipped with an EBSD detector
that allows recording of the Kikuchi bands, which provide the EBSD
pattern of a given sample spot. Figure 2 shows
the resulting orientation map and a comparison with the PEEM image
of a clean sample surface. As can be seen from Figure 2, the EBSD results are in perfect agreement with the independent
work function analysis by PEEM. The advantage of EBSD is that one
can identify also higher Miller index orientations such as, for example,
(210) which are often present on the surface, but can hardly be identified
on the basis of sole work function measurements. Owing to the unique
shape of the individual domains, the domains identified by EBSD can
be easily located and visually recognized by PEEM, and the chosen
domain of the sample surface can be placed in front of the PEEM lens
by the movable sample holder.
Figure 2
Orientation of the particular surface domains for a chosen field
of view of the polycrystalline Pd foil: (a) as identified by work
function differences in PEEM; (b) the same, but by EBSD. Note the
inverse pole figure assigning the corresponding directions.
Orientation of the particular surface domains for a chosen field
of view of the polycrystalline Pd foil: (a) as identified by work
function differences in PEEM; (b) the same, but by EBSD. Note the
inverse pole figure assigning the corresponding directions.The STM experiments on the Pd(111) single crystal have been carried
out in a separate UHV system with a base pressure below 10–10 mbar in both the preparation and analysis chambers, using the customized
commercial STM (Omicron μ-STM) as described elsewhere.[21]
Results and Discussion
Using the above-mentioned combined PEEM–MS approach, a systematic
set of kinetic measurements for the CO oxidation reaction on the polycrystallinePd foil was performed, upon which both the CO2 reaction
rate and the video-PEEM data were recorded simultaneously during a
cyclic variation of the CO partial pressure in the range of ∼10–8 mbar to ∼10–4 mbar at constant
oxygen pressure (pO2 = 1.3 × 10–5 mbar) and different constant temperatures in the
range of 405 to 513 K. Both the global CO2 reaction rate,
produced by the entire sample, and the local PEEM intensities of the
individual grains exhibit a pronounced hysteresis (see Figure 1b,c).The observed hysteresis characterizes the bistability in the CO
oxidation reaction as an inherent property of a reaction between a
strongly bound monomer (CO) and a dimer (O2) with different
adsorption kinetics: O2 dissociation is blocked on a densely
CO-covered surface, while CO can still adsorb and react on a surface
with saturation coverage of adsorbed oxygen.[22] Thus, in a range of reaction conditions two states can be stable:
a catalytically active surface with high oxygen coverage, where adsorbing
CO is quickly removed by the reaction with adsorbed oxygen, as well
as a completely CO-covered state of the surface, which is inactive
(CO-poisoned).[23,24]The bistable behavior of the CO oxidation on the platinum group
metals is well studied, both experimentally[25−27] and theoretically,
where mean field (MF) mesoscopic models[28] and kinetic Monte Carlo (KMS) atomistic models[29,30] were applied. In particular, the pioneering work of Ziff, Gulari,
and Barshad should be mentioned because of admitting spatial inhomogeneities
usually averaged in mean field considerations.[29] Studies on microscopically sized surfaces like nanofacets
of a Pt field emitter tip[31] or clusters[32] have demonstrated that the bistability remains
present, as an inherent property of a monomer–dimer Langmuir–Hinshelwood
reaction, also in nanosized reaction systems and is limited only by
fluctuation-induced effects.[33]It has been shown that the bistability and kinetic transitions
from, for example, active to inactive state have formal similarities
to equilibrium phase transitions. As already noticed by Schlögl
in the 1970s, in both equilibrium and nonequilibrium phase transitions,
a crucial role is played by cooperative phenomena forming, for example,
ordered structures in an equilibrium, and self-organizing dissipative
structures in a nonequilibrium situation.[34,35] The coverage of the reactants plays here the role of the order parameter
in a phase transition, and the point where bistability sets in corresponds
to the critical point (bifurcation).[36−38]The transitions from the active to the inactive state and vice versa are called kinetic transition points τA and τB, respectively (see Figure 1b,c). This means that the behavior of the reaction
system changes qualitatively when some externally controlled parameters
such as temperature or pressure pass a certain value.[36]Plotting the pCO of τA and τB, which were determined from the RCO2 hysteresis curves (see Figure 1b), as a function of the reciprocal temperature, yields the
so-called kinetic phase diagram, which is presented for the polycrystallinePd foil in Figure 3. Such a diagram summarizes
effectively the steady states of high reactivity and low reactivity
as well as the region of bistability and represents the catalytic
properties of the entire sample in a wide range of pCO and T at constant pO2. Since the transition points depend not only
on external parameters as the temperature, but naturally also on intrinsic
properties of the studied system such as the crystallographic orientation
or the surface structure (roughness), such a diagram characterizing
the particular system is well suited to compare different reaction
systems and to reveal the influence of different factors such as promoters.[39]
Figure 3
Global kinetic phase diagrams for the smooth (sputtered and annealed)
Pd foil (black squares) and for the same but additionally sputtered
Pd foil (red circles), as obtained by MS at constant pO2 = 1.3 × 10–5 mbar and different
constant temperatures in the range between 405 and 513 K. Filled and
empty symbols represent the τA and τB transitions, correspondingly.
Global kinetic phase diagrams for the smooth (sputtered and annealed)
Pd foil (black squares) and for the same but additionally sputtered
Pd foil (red circles), as obtained by MS at constant pO2 = 1.3 × 10–5 mbar and different
constant temperatures in the range between 405 and 513 K. Filled and
empty symbols represent the τA and τB transitions, correspondingly.The main goal of the present study was to compare the catalytic
properties of the nearly ideal, that is, sputtered and annealed Pd(hkl) surfaces with the same surfaces that were artificially
modified by additional Ar+ sputtering. In the global kinetic
diagrams of the smooth and the sputtered Pd foil, a remarkable difference
is apparent (see Figure 3): the diagram for
the sputtered foil (red symbols in Figure 3) is shifted significantly toward higher CO pressure, as compared
to that of the smooth surface. This indicates that CO oxidation on
the sputtered Pd foil is inhibited by CO poisoning only at a considerably
higher CO partial pressure and the sputtered surface is also reactivated
at a higher CO pressure than the annealed Pd foil. In other words,
the defect-rich sputtered sample is much more tolerant toward CO poisoning
than the smooth surface.To explain these observations, STM has been applied to image both
a smooth and an additionally sputtered Pd(111) single crystal surface
which was subjected to Ar+ sputtering under the same conditions
as the Pd foil (Ekin = 1 keV, ion dose
2 × 1016 cm–2, sample at room temperature).
The corresponding STM images are shown in Figures 4a,b. The freshly prepared (sputtered and annealed) Pd(111)surface exhibits well-defined smooth terraces with a typical terrace
width of 20–30 nm (Figure 4a). The situation
changes strongly upon sputtering (Figure 4b):
ion bombardment of the surface leads to formation of three-dimensional
islands, with a very high density of steps and edges. The uppermost
terraces of the mounds have diameters of 2–3 nm, and the slope
angles are between 10° and 20°, corresponding to terrace
widths of 0.6 to 1.2 nm. This means that about one-quarter of all
surfacePd atoms are step or kink atoms. With the in-plane lattice constant of the Pd(111)surface of 2.74 Å the surface
corresponds to a mixture of high-index surfaces with 2–6 atom
wide (111) terraces and [100]- and [110]-directed steps, but with
an additional very high amount of kink atoms.
Figure 4
(a) STM micrograph of the annealed Pd(111) surface (100 ×
100 nm2). (b) The same surface after Ar+ ion
sputtering (20 × 20 nm2; the high-pass filtered image
on the right shows the steps). The bottom of each panel shows a 3D
view; enhancement of high frequencies and edge-preserving blur has
been used to improve the visibility of steps in the 3D image (b).
(a) STM micrograph of the annealed Pd(111)surface (100 ×
100 nm2). (b) The same surface after Ar+ ion
sputtering (20 × 20 nm2; the high-pass filtered image
on the right shows the steps). The bottom of each panel shows a 3D
view; enhancement of high frequencies and edge-preserving blur has
been used to improve the visibility of steps in the 3D image (b).It is known that the binding energy of oxygen is considerably higher
at low-coordination defect sites than on flat terraces of Pd; that
is, atomic oxygen binds more strongly to a defect-rich Pdsurface.[40,41] Although the CO binding energy is also altered on such defect sites
on the Pdsurface,[42] the impact on the
CO adsorption kinetics appears to be rather small when compared to
oxygen.[43] Since the energetics governs
the kinetics of the competitive CO and oxygen coadsorption, this explains
why on the sputtered Pdsurface higher CO pressure is required to
poison the surface. The higher CO pressure values at which reactivation
of the sputtered Pdsurface occurs, that is, the reverse transition
τB, can be directly explained by the adsorption kinetics
rather than the energetics: Owing to the high step and defect density,
more adsorption sites for oxygen adsorption on a mainly CO-covered
surface are available, the sticking probability for oxygen adsorption
is considerably higher, and, therefore, the reactivation occurs at
a higher CO-to-oxygen pressure ratio than on the smooth surface.Although an illustration of the global catalytic properties such
as in Figure 3 is useful, it does not provide
any local information about the properties of the individual grains
due to the averaging character of the measurement method (MS). In
turn, PEEM provides the laterally resolved data. Since the PEEM images
and the EBSD scan revealed that the sample consists of many grains
with differing crystallographic orientation it could be expected that
the effect of sputtering on the catalytic behavior of the individual
(hkl) domains could be different (due to the different initial atomic
configurations of the grains). As mentioned, the analysis of the local
PEEM-intensities for selected individual crystalline grains allows
the acquisition of the local hysteresis curves (Figure 1c) which result in turn in the local kinetic phase
diagrams as shown in Figure 5 for
the four chosen (110)-, (210)-, (100)-, and (111)-oriented domains
of the smooth Pdsurface. As expected for different orientations,
the CO-tolerance and the ability for reactivation are clearly related
to the atomic structure: whereas the local kinetic phase diagram of
the most open structure among the four studied orientations, that
is, the (110) domain, is located at the highest CO-to-oxygen pressure
ratio, the corresponding diagram of the closest-packed (111) domain
is situated at the lowest value of the pressure ratio. In turn, the
local kinetic phase diagram of the (210) domain with a surface consisting
of (100) terraces and (110) steps, lies exactly between the diagrams
of the (110) and the (100) domains.
Figure 5
CO oxidation on individual Pd(hkl) domains of a smooth Pd foil.
(a) Local kinetic phase diagrams of individual [110]- (red), [210]-
(green), [100]- (black), and [111]-oriented (blue) domains of Pd foil
during CO oxidation at constant pO2 =
1.3 × 10–5 mbar obtained by PEEM intensity
analysis. Frames 1–3 illustrate the transition τB from the inactive steady state (CO-covered, dark contrast)
to the active steady state (oxygen-covered, bright contrast) at 405
K, pCO scan from 5.4 × 10–5 mbar to 4.0 × 10–5 mbar. (b) PEEM images
illustrating the independency of the domains in the CO oxidation reaction:
the reaction fronts are stopped at the grain boundaries, no coupling
between differently oriented grains was observed under the present
conditions.
CO oxidation on individual Pd(hkl) domains of a smooth Pd foil.
(a) Local kinetic phase diagrams of individual [110]- (red), [210]-
(green), [100]- (black), and [111]-oriented (blue) domains of Pd foil
during CO oxidation at constant pO2 =
1.3 × 10–5 mbar obtained by PEEM intensity
analysis. Frames 1–3 illustrate the transition τB from the inactive steady state (CO-covered, dark contrast)
to the active steady state (oxygen-covered, bright contrast) at 405
K, pCO scan from 5.4 × 10–5 mbar to 4.0 × 10–5 mbar. (b) PEEM images
illustrating the independency of the domains in the CO oxidation reaction:
the reaction fronts are stopped at the grain boundaries, no coupling
between differently oriented grains was observed under the present
conditions.Before discussing the local PEEM data, we note that the work function
of Pd(hkl) surfaces increases upon CO adsorption
by up to 1.2 eV.[44,45] Adsorption of oxygen, in turn,
causes an increase in the Pd(hkl) work function values
by up to 0.8 eV.[45,46] Thus, the regions covered by
oxygen appear brighter than the CO-covered regions (in contrary to
Pt surfaces where the contrast is inversed).[17,25,47,48]The PEEM frames 1–3 in Figure 5,
corresponding to CO pressures of 5.4 × 10–6 mbar, 4.3 × 10–6 mbar, and 4.0 × 10–6 mbar, illustrate the transition τB from the inactive CO-covered (high work function, dark contrast)
state to the highly reactive oxygen covered state (lower work function,
bright contrast) at 405 K caused by decreasing the CO pressure. During
the transition, bright oxygen fronts propagate across the individual
domains (the [111], [100], [210], and [110] orientations are denoted
in frame 1), remaining in each case strongly confined within the grain
boundaries, that is, no front propagation across the boundaries occurs.
Note that the transition τB observed for the (210)
domain (frame 2) occurs exactly between the τB transitions
on the (110) and the (100) domains (frame 1 and 3, respectively),
confirming again the structure–reactivity relation. In Figure 5b, displaying magnified PEEM images of the (110)
domain, it is visible how the bright oxygen front nucleates at the
grain boundary, that is, in a region of a very high step and defect
density, propagates across the domain, and is effectively stopped
at the surrounding grain boundaries due to the unsuitable conditions
for the transition τB on the surrounding grains.Apparently, the individual domains behave quasi-independently within
the complex neighborhood of other differently oriented grains, at
least under the current reaction conditions. Such independent single-crystal-like
reaction behavior of the individual grains can be understood by considering
possible mechanisms of reactive synchronization (coupling) between
the different surface regions: at small (nanometer-sized) length scales,
diffusion coupling was made responsible for the synchronization of
local transitions.[33] At pressures higher
than 10–4 mbar, gas-phase coupling provides the
synchronization over macroscopic samples,[49,50] and near atmospheric pressure, heat transfer contributes significantly
or even dominates spatial coupling.[51,52] Evidently,
under the present pressure conditions, the micrometer size of the
individual grains is not sufficient to synchronize the kinetic transitions
on differently oriented grains via fast CO and oxygen consumption
from the gas phase. On the other hand, the grain boundaries seem to
hinder effectively the diffusion coupling (frames 1–3 in Figure 5).Figure 6 illustrates the change of the local
reaction properties of the individual domains upon Ar+ sputtering,
showing the local kinetic phase diagrams of the same (110)-, (100)-,
and (111)-oriented domains as in Figure 5,
but measured after additional Ar+ ion bombardment (15 min,
1 keV). For comparison, the local kinetic phase diagrams of the annealed
(100) and the (111) domains are included. Evidently, the local kinetic
transitions on all domains are now located at generally higher CO
pressures, as expected from the global results (Figure 3). In turn, the individual kinetic phase diagrams, which were
clearly separated from each other in the case of the smooth foil,
are shifted together and can hardly be distinguished from each other
for the sputtered foil. This means that the local kinetic transitions
on the individual domains of the sputtered Pd foil
occur almost “at once” and not “delayed”
with respect to each other, as we had observed for the smooth surface.
Figure 6
CO oxidation on individual Pd(hkl) domains of
a sputtered Pd foil. (a) Local kinetic phase diagrams of the individual
[110]- (red), [100]- (black), and [111]-oriented (blue) grains on
the additionally sputtered Pd foil, in comparison with the (100) and
(111) domains on the annealed Pd foil, at constant pO2 = 1.3 × 10–5 mbar and different
constant temperatures. The local kinetic phase diagrams of the sputtered
surface are shifted together and toward higher CO pressures, as compared
to the local kinetic phase diagrams of the annealed sample (see Figure 5a). PEEM-frames 1–3: transition τB at 405 K on the additionally sputtered Pd foil, pCO = 5.9 × 10–5 mbar. (b) PEEM
images illustrating the propagation of the reaction fronts across
the grain boundaries. The independency of the individual domains is
lifted.
CO oxidation on individual Pd(hkl) domains of
a sputtered Pd foil. (a) Local kinetic phase diagrams of the individual
[110]- (red), [100]- (black), and [111]-oriented (blue) grains on
the additionally sputtered Pd foil, in comparison with the (100) and
(111) domains on the annealed Pd foil, at constant pO2 = 1.3 × 10–5 mbar and different
constant temperatures. The local kinetic phase diagrams of the sputtered
surface are shifted together and toward higher CO pressures, as compared
to the local kinetic phase diagrams of the annealed sample (see Figure 5a). PEEM-frames 1–3: transition τB at 405 K on the additionally sputtered Pd foil, pCO = 5.9 × 10–5 mbar. (b) PEEM
images illustrating the propagation of the reaction fronts across
the grain boundaries. The independency of the individual domains is
lifted.The PEEM frames 1–3 in Figure 6a,
recorded within a few seconds at a CO partial pressure of 5.9 ×
10–6 mbar, showing the transition τB at the same temperature of 405 K as in Figure 5, but on the additionally sputtered sample, confirm this suggestion:
The bright oxygen fronts do not stop at the grain boundaries and propagate
almost instantaneously across the entire foil. It is clear that on
the sputtered Pd foil the differences in the local reaction kinetics
are reduced by sputtering, due to the similarly damaged structure
of the different domains. Thus, the reaction fronts propagate across
the grain boundaries, because the conditions required for the kinetic
transition are similar on the now similarly structured neighboring
grains. Also, the grain boundaries do not serve as nucleation centers
for the reaction fronts anymore, which can be clearly seen by a comparison
of the magnified PEEM images of the (110) domain in Figures 5b and 6b. On the additionally
sputtered foil, the reaction fronts nucleate primarily in the inner
part of the domains rather than at the grain boundaries; that is,
the defects on the roughened surface of the sputtered foil are able
to nucleate the reaction fronts (Figure 6b).
We attribute the nucleation of the reaction fronts at grain boundaries
of the unsputtered surface to high-index facets in the grooves separating
different grains. In contrast, on the sputtered surface, the local
atomic-scale roughness will be high both in the macroscopically flat
areas and in the grooves; thus the reaction fronts can start anywhere.In general, Ar+ sputtering at the applied intensity
apparently creates a similarly “damaged” (roughened)
surface structure on all individual low-index Pd domains, lifting
in this way their quasi-independent behavior in the CO oxidation and
shifting significantly the individual local kinetic phase diagrams.
This should enable future applications with a finely dosed impact
of Ar+ ions, creating controlled structure disorder and
targeted phase diagram shifts as a step toward tailored catalytic
properties. Using of this approach to modify in a controlled way bimetallic
or oxide-covered surfaces might be also feasible, of course.
Summary
The role of artificially created defects and steps in the local
reaction kinetics of CO oxidation on low-index Pd surfaces was studied
by PEEM, MS, and STM. The reaction kinetics on the smooth (Ar+ sputtered and annealed) and defect-rich (additionally Ar+ sputtered) Pd(hkl) surfaces were directly
compared, using the novel PEEM-based approach, allowing the simultaneous
determination of local kinetic phase transitions on micrometer-sized
grains of a polycrystalline sample.In the case of the smooth surface, individual Pd(hkl) domains behave independently (single-crystal-like) with respect
to CO oxidation at the present conditions, that is, in the 10–5 mbar pressure range. In turn, after sputtering, the
presence of plenty of defects lifts the domain independency and leads
rather to a correlated reaction behavior: the kinetic phase diagrams
of the different grains approach each other and the reaction fronts
propagate unhindered across the grain boundaries. Both the global
(MS-measured) and the local (PEEM-measured) kinetic phase diagrams
shift toward a higher CO pressure (higher CO tolerance) for the defect-rich
surface, due to the differently modified oxygen and CO binding energies
on the low-coordinated step and defect sites, as compared to the smooth
surface. The exact identity of the experimental conditions for the
different crystallographic orientations and the parallel principle
of the used PEEM-technique, which allow the simultaneous monitoring
of dynamic processes on different domains, open interesting perspectives
for future applications of this approach.
Authors: Ronnie T Vang; Karoliina Honkala; Søren Dahl; Ebbe K Vestergaard; Joachim Schnadt; Erik Laegsgaard; Bjerne S Clausen; Jens K Nørskov; Flemming Besenbacher Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2005-01-23 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: J Klikovits; M Schmid; J Gustafson; A Mikkelsen; A Resta; E Lundgren; J N Andersen; P Varga Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2006-05-25 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: David Albinsson; Stephan Bartling; Sara Nilsson; Henrik Ström; Joachim Fritzsche; Christoph Langhammer Journal: ACS Catal Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 13.084
Authors: M Datler; I Bespalov; S Buhr; J Zeininger; M Stöger-Pollach; J Bernardi; G Rupprechter; Y Suchorski Journal: Catal Letters Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Yuri Suchorski; Martin Datler; Ivan Bespalov; Johannes Zeininger; Michael Stöger-Pollach; Johannes Bernardi; Henrik Grönbeck; Günther Rupprechter Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 4.126