| Literature DB >> 23785462 |
Annabelle Bourgine1, Paul Pilet, Sara Diouani, Sophie Sourice, Julie Lesoeur, Sarah Beck-Cormier, Solmaz Khoshniat, Pierre Weiss, Gérard Friedlander, Jérôme Guicheux, Laurent Beck.
Abstract
The formation of <span class="Chemical">hydroxyapatite crystals and their insertion into collagen fibrils of the matrix are essential steps for bone mineralization. As <span class="Chemical">phosphate is a main structural component of apatite crystals, its uptake by skeletal cells is critical and must be controlled by specialized membrane proteins. In mammals, in vitro studies have suggested that the high-affinity sodium-phosphate cotransporter PiT1 could play this role. In vivo, PiT1 expression was detected in hypertrophic chondrocytes of murine metatarsals, but its implication in bone physiology is not yet deciphered. As the complete deletion of PiT1 results in embryonic lethality at E12.5, we took advantage of a mouse model bearing two copies of PiT1 hypomorphic alleles to study the effect of a low expression of PiT1 on bone mineralization in vivo. In this report, we show that a 85% down-regulation of PiT1 in long bones resulted in a slight (6%) but significant reduction of femur length in young mice (15- and 30-day-old). However, despite a defect in alcian blue / alizarin red S and Von Kossa staining of hypomorphic 1-day-old mice, using X-rays micro-computed tomography, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and histological staining techniques we could not detect differences between hypomorphic and wild-type mice of 15- to 300-days old. Interestingly, the expression of PiT2, the paralog of PiT1, was increased 2-fold in bone of PiT1 hypomorphic mice accounting for a normal phosphate uptake in mutant cells. Whether this may contribute to the absence of bone mineralization defects remains to be further deciphered.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23785462 PMCID: PMC3681848 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065979
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Murine-specific primers used for RT-PCR analyses.
| Gene | Sense (5’–3’) | Antisense (5’–3’) |
|---|---|---|
|
| GAAGGTCGGTGTGAACGGAT | CGTTGAATTTGCCGTGAGTG |
|
| TGTGGCAAATGGGCAGAAG | AGAAAGCAGCGGAGAGACGA |
|
| CCATCGGCTTCTCACTCGT | AAACCAGGAGGCGACAATCT |
|
| TCCTGGAAGAAGGAAGGGCCGT | CAGGGAAGGACCCCAAAAGCCC |
|
| AGCCCCAGGGAGAAGCTATC | CCACAGTAGGATGCCCGAGA |
|
| CAGGACACTGGGATCAAATGG | GAAGGCGCTGCTCAGTACATC |
|
| CAGCCCTGCAGACATGTTAAT | GCACCAGGTACCACAGCAG |
Figure 1Growth of hypomorphic PiT1 mice.
(A) Body weight (g) of 1-day-old PiT1 and PiT1 mice. (B) Evolution of body weight of PiT1 (n = 3 to 19) and PiT1 (n = 3 to 10) female mice from 1 to 165 days. Inset: growth curve of mice from 1 to 30 days of age. Data represent mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was carried out by Mann & Whitney’s method. (C) Growth appearance of PiT1 and PiT1 mice at 30 days of age.
Figure 2Alcian blue / alizarin red S double staining of the skeleton of 1-day-old PiT1 and PiT1 mice.
(A) Whole skeleton staining of PiT1 and PiT1 mice. (B) Magnification on the skull: the frontal (fr), parietal (pa) and occipital (oc) bones are not mineralized in PiT1 1-day-old mice. (C) PiT1 1-day-old pups present a significant delay of mineralization at the ribs (white arrow head) and the spine (black arrow head). (D) Magnification on the hind limbs: the tibia (tb) and the fibula (fb) of PiT1 1-day-old mice are not mineralized, and a retardation of mineralization is observed in the femur (fm).
Figure 3Histomorphometric analysis of femurs from PiT1 and hypomorphic PiT1 mice.
(A) Femur length of 15- and 30-day-old PiT1 and PiT1 mice. At 15 days of age, there is a significant difference between the femur length of PiT1 (n = 11) and PiT1 (n = 10) mice. This difference persists at 30 days of age (PiT1 : n = 18; PiT1 : n = 19). (B) Essential histomorphometric parameters to describe trabecular bone morphometry in 15- and 30-day-old PiT1 and PiT1 femurs: the bone volume fraction (BV/TV), the trabecular number (Tb.N), the trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and the trabecular separation (Tb. Sp). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. The analysis was repeated in 8 to 21 male and female mice in each group. Statistical analysis was carried out by Mann & Whitney’s method.
Figure 4Von Kossa and Goldner’s trichrome histological staining of femur sections from PiT1 and hypomorphic PiT1 mice.
Femurs from 1- (P1) and 15- (P15) day-old PiT1 and PiT1 mice were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained using Von Kossa (A) or Goldner’s trichrome (B) staining method. Using Von Kossa staining, the mineral deposition is stained in black. The Goldner’s trichrome reveals the glycoaminoglycan matrix in blue-green. With these two staining, the osteoid is stained in red. Bars represent 200 µm.
Figure 5Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis of femurs from PiT1 and hypomorphic PiT1 mice.
Ca/P ratio in 1- to 300-day-old PiT1 and PiT1 femurs. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. The analysis was repeated in 3 mice femurs in each group with twenty EDX microanalyses per femur. Statistical analysis was carried out by Mann & Whitney’s method.
Figure 6Expression of sodium-dependent phosphate transporters in tibias of hypomorphic PiT1 mice.
Total RNA was extracted from tibias of 15- (A) and 30-day-old (B) PiT1 (black bars) and PiT1 (grey bars) mice and analyzed by RT-PCR for the expression of PiT1, PiT2, Npt1, Npt2a, Npt2b and Npt2c. Results are reported after normalization to the expression of Gapdh. Data are represented as mean ± SEM from analysis of 6 mice per group. Statistical analysis was carried out by Mann & Whitney’s method.
Figure 7Hypomorphic expression of PiT1 in MEFs does not affect sodium-Pi cotransport.
(A) Sodium-Pi uptake in MEFs. The transport of Pi was measured during the linear phase of uptake using radiolabelled Pi as previously descrived [28]. Hypomorphic expression of PiT1 in MEFs does not modify the overall Pi uptake. (B) Quantification of the expression of PiT1 and PiT2 mRNAs in PiT1 and PiT1 MEFs by RT-PCR. Note the 1.8-fold overexpression of PiT2 mRNA in PiT1-null MEFs. * indicates significant differences as compared to wild-type controls with p=0.05, respectively.