We recently demonstrated by in vitro experiments that PLGA (poly D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) potentiates T helper 1 (Th1) immune responses induced by a peptide derived from the recombinant major outer membrane protein (rMOMP) of Chlamydia trachomatis, and may be a promising vaccine delivery system. Herein we evaluated the immune-potentiating potential of PLGA by encapsulating the full-length rMOMP (PLGA-rMOMP), characterizing it in vitro, and investigating its immunogenicity in vivo. Our hypothesis was that PLGA-rMOMP triggers Th1 immune responses in mice, which are desirable prerequisites for a C. trachomatis candidate nanovaccine. Physical-structural characterizations of PLGA-rMOMP revealed its size (approximately 272 nm), zeta potential (-14.30 mV), apparent spherical smooth morphology, and continuous slow release pattern. PLGA potentiated the ability of encapsulated rMOMP to trigger production of cytokines and chemokines by mouse J774 macrophages. Flow cytometric analyses revealed that spleen cells from BALB/c mice immunized with PLGA-rMOMP had elevated numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets, and secreted more rMOMP-specific interferon-gamma (Th1) and interleukin (IL)-12p40 (Th1/Th17) than IL-4 and IL-10 (Th2) cytokines. PLGA-rMOMP-immunized mice produced higher serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgG2a (Th1) than IgG1 (Th2) rMOMP-specific antibodies. Notably, sera from PLGA-rMOMP-immunized mice had a 64-fold higher Th1 than Th2 antibody titer, whereas mice immunized with rMOMP in Freund's adjuvant had only a four-fold higher Th1 than Th2 antibody titer, suggesting primarily induction of a Th1 antibody response in PLGA-rMOMP-immunized mice. Our data underscore PLGA as an effective delivery system for a C. trachomatis vaccine. The capacity of PLGA-rMOMP to trigger primarily Th1 immune responses in mice promotes it as a highly desirable candidate nanovaccine against C. trachomatis.
We recently demonstrated by in vitro experiments that PLGA (poly D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) potentiates T helper 1 (Th1) immune responses induced by a peptide derived from the recombinant major outer membrane protein (rMOMP) of Chlamydia trachomatis, and may be a promising vaccine delivery system. Herein we evaluated the immune-potentiating potential of PLGA by encapsulating the full-length rMOMP (PLGA-rMOMP), characterizing it in vitro, and investigating its immunogenicity in vivo. Our hypothesis was that PLGA-rMOMP triggers Th1 immune responses in mice, which are desirable prerequisites for a C. trachomatis candidate nanovaccine. Physical-structural characterizations of PLGA-rMOMP revealed its size (approximately 272 nm), zeta potential (-14.30 mV), apparent spherical smooth morphology, and continuous slow release pattern. PLGA potentiated the ability of encapsulated rMOMP to trigger production of cytokines and chemokines by mouseJ774 macrophages. Flow cytometric analyses revealed that spleen cells from BALB/c mice immunized with PLGA-rMOMP had elevated numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets, and secreted more rMOMP-specific interferon-gamma (Th1) and interleukin (IL)-12p40 (Th1/Th17) than IL-4 and IL-10 (Th2) cytokines. PLGA-rMOMP-immunized mice produced higher serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgG2a (Th1) than IgG1 (Th2) rMOMP-specific antibodies. Notably, sera from PLGA-rMOMP-immunized mice had a 64-fold higher Th1 than Th2 antibody titer, whereas mice immunized with rMOMP in Freund's adjuvant had only a four-fold higher Th1 than Th2 antibody titer, suggesting primarily induction of a Th1 antibody response in PLGA-rMOMP-immunized mice. Our data underscore PLGA as an effective delivery system for a C. trachomatis vaccine. The capacity of PLGA-rMOMP to trigger primarily Th1 immune responses in mice promotes it as a highly desirable candidate nanovaccine against C. trachomatis.
Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common sexually transmitted bacterium in both
developed and developing countries, which makes it of serious public health concern.1,2
Reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention state that more than 90 million new
cases occur each year.1–4 Over 75% of women and 50% of men are
asymptomatic5,6 and therefore do not seek medical treatment.1,3,7,8
Currently, the most common control method for C. trachomatis infection is the use
of antibiotics. However, the asymptomatic nature of the bacterium precludes early detection, thus
making use of antibiotics problematic. Moreover, antibiotics do not always protect against
established infections or reinfection. If left untreated, C. trachomatis infection
can result in pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, infertility, and epididymitis.9,10
The global cost associated with treating infectedpatients has reached in excess of 10 billion
dollars annually.11–13Because antibiotic treatment of C. trachomatis is effective only during early
infection, and does not prevent reinfection, there is a general consensus in the field that the best
approach to controlling this bacterial infection is a vaccine. However, the challenge in development
of C. trachomatis vaccine is selection of an immunogen, its delivery, and the
capacity of the immunogen to mount an immune response, which will provide long-term protective
resistance against infection. In the early 1950s, vaccines were developed using live, inactivated,
or attenuated whole C. trachomatis.14–20 Although these vaccines
offered some degree of protection, the costs associated with production, the complexity of
protection, and the possibility of the bacteria reverting to virulent forms made them far from ideal
as candidate nanovaccines. To avoid the harmful effects associated with these earlier forms of
vaccines, subunit proteins have become attractive alternatives as a candidate vaccine against
C. trachomatis.To date, the most promising subunit candidate vaccine is the major outer membrane protein (MOMP)
of C. trachomatis.21–25 MOMP accounts for
60% of the outer membrane mass of C. trachomatis and is considered an ideal
candidate because it contains many antigenic T cell and B cell epitopes.26,27 Nonetheless,
vaccine research with MOMP as the prime immunogen has been both encouraging and disappointing.
Previous studies using native MOMP in combination with adjuvant revealed some protective efficacy in
vivo,28–30 but the drawback with native MOMP is the expense associated with its
production if selected as a candidate vaccine.16
The use of recombinant MOMP (rMOMP) with conventional adjuvants, including cholera toxin, aluminum,
and CpG, to name a few, has been widely explored, but the degree of protection achieved with these
vaccines is not as robust as that achieved with native MOMP.31–35A promising alternative to using adjuvant is encapsulation of an immunogen in biodegradable
polymers approved by the US Food and Drug Administration that release their contents over time.36–45 Among the approved biodegradable polymers, poly D, L-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA)
nanoparticles have advantages that include enhancement of immune responses,9–42 delivery,
biocompatibility and biodegradability, size, and sustained release.38,43,44 Several studies have shown the efficiency of this
release system when used to encapsulate other peptides, proteins, or DNA.39–44
Additionally, a study by Champion et al showed the protective efficacy of MOMP in a vault
nanoparticle.46 The uniqueness of PLGA versus
other biodegradable nanoparticles is that it undergoes nonenzymatic hydrolysis, resulting in two
biological metabolic byproducts, namely lactic acid and glycolic acid. We recently reported that a
peptide derivative of rMOMP encapsulated in PLGA 85:15 had a slow release profile which triggered T
helper (Th)1 responses in vitro using mouseJ774 macrophages.44 Moreover, we showed that these responses were potentiated by the
presence of PLGA as the delivery system. In the present study, we encapsulated full-length rMOMP in
PLGA 50:50 and subjected it to in vitro physical-structural characterization and immunogenicity
studies using mouseJ774 macrophages. Additionally, we assessed the immunogenicity of PLGA-rMOMP in
BALB/c mice. We hypothesize that PLGA-rMOMP will trigger Th1 immune responses in mice, which are
desirable prerequisites for a candidate C. trachomatis vaccine. Our data show the
successful encapsulation of rMOMP in PLGA and that PLGA potentiates the production of cytokines and
chemokines, as elicited by encapsulated rMOMP in macrophages. Of major significance, encapsulated
rMOMP induced heightened cellular and antibody Th1 immune responses in mice. The potential of
PLGA-rMOMP as a candidate nanovaccine against C. trachomatis is discussed
herein.
Materials and methods
Cloning, expression, and purification of rMOMP
Polymerase chain reaction amplification of the full-length MOMP was performed following
previously published methods35 using Phusion Taq
DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and the following primers: forward
5′-CGAACAGATTGGAGGTAAAAAACTCTT-GAAATCGGTATTAG-3′ and reverse
5′-CACGCGGCCGCT-TAGAAGCGGAATTGTGC-3′ and ligated in pESUMO plasmid using T4 ligase
kit (Life Technologies, Grand Isle, NY, USA). The plasmid was sequenced (Auburn University Genomics
and Sequencing Laboratory, Auburn, AL, USA) and subsequently transformed into Rosetta (DE3)
Escherichia coli-competent cells for protein expression. The apparent molecular
weight and purity of rMOMP were determined by separation of protein extracts using
4%–20% ready linear gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate gels (BioRad
Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (BioRad) and imaged using an
Odyssey imaging system (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA). The protein was purified using a nickel affinity
purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) under denaturing conditions, as previously
described.35 The specificity of the purified rMOMP
was confirmed by Western blotting35 using
anti-MOMP polyclonal antibodies (Fitzgerald Industries, Concord, MA, USA) followed by an Alexa Fluor
680 antibody (Life Technologies). Bound antibody was visualized using the Odyssey imaging system.
The purified rMOMP preparation was also free of endotoxin activity, as assessed by polymyxin B
experiments (data not shown).
Fabrication of nanoparticles
PLGA 50:50 (molecular weight 30,000–60,000, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA)
nanoparticles were prepared using a modified w/o/w emulsion evaporation technique.44 Briefly, PLGA (1%) and rMOMP (at a
concentration of 500 μg in phosphate-buffered saline) were dissolved in dichloromethane
(Sigma-Aldrich) and sonicated at a continuous mode for two minutes at 20-second intervals on ice,
with the resulting emulsion added to an aqueous solution of 1% polyvinyl alcohol (molecular
weight 85,000–124,000, Sigma) and sonicated again. The emulsion was stirred overnight at
room temperature and the nanoparticles obtained by ultracentrifugation were washed three times with
deionized water to remove excess polyvinyl alcohol, and then lyophilized (Lab Conoco, Kansas City,
MO, USA) in the presence of 5% trehalose (as a stabilizer) to obtain PLGA-rMOMP. An
equivalent volume of phosphate-buffered saline solution (as used for rMOMP) was similarly
encapsulated in PLGA to serve as a negative control (PLGA-PBS). All lyophilized nanoparticles were
stored at −80°C until used.The encapsulation efficiency was extrapolated from measurements of the total protein encapsulated
into PLGA as described previously.44 Briefly, 20
mg of lyophilized PLGA-rMOMP was added to 1 mL of 0.1 N NaOH containing 2% sodium dodecyl
sulfate and shaken overnight at room temperature. The supernatants were collected after
centrifugation at 13,680 × g for five minutes and stored at −20°C. A micro
bicinchoninic acid protein assay was used to quantify rMOMP in the supernatants, and absorbance was
read at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Tecan US Inc, Durham, NC, USA). Background readings were
corrected by subtracting the optical density values of supernatants from PLGA-PBS. The rMOMP
encapsulation efficiency (EE) was calculated using the following formula: where A is the total amount of rMOMP and B is the free amount of rMOMP.
These measurements were performed three times.
In vitro studies
Physical-structural characterization of nanoparticles
The encapsulated nanoparticles were characterized for their size, zeta potential, composition,
and encapsulation efficiency following previously published methods.44,45 Particle size
and zeta potential measurements were obtained using a Malvern Zeta Sizer Nano ZS (Malvern
Instruments Ltd, Worcestershire, UK). For each sample, a specific amount of nanoparticles was
suspended in filtered water and sonicated prior to determinations of particle size and zeta
potential. The results were expressed as the mean of triplicate runs.
Surface morphology and ultraviolet visualization
Both scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss Evo, Thornwood, NY, USA) and transmission electron
microscopy (TEM, Zeiss EM10) were used to ascertain surface morphology and size, following
previously published methods.44 TEM and SEM
samples were prepared by placing one drop of diluted nanoparticle suspension on a carbon-coated grid
or metal stub. The drop was allowed to dry at room temperature prior to microscopic analysis.Ultraviolet visualization was used to ascertain the encapsulation of rMOMP in PLGA. For this
study, nanoparticles were diluted in deionized water and their absorbance and spectral wavelength
were used to determine whether absorption occurred on the outside of the nanoparticle.
Release of encapsulated-rMOMP
In vitro release of rMOMP from the PLGA nanoparticles was determined as described.44 In brief, encapsulated-rMOMP (250 μg/mL) was
resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.01% sodium azide and the tubes
incubated at 37°C. At predetermined time intervals, the tubes were centrifuged, the
supernatants were removed from the nanoparticles followed by replenishment of the same volume of
fresh phosphate-buffered saline to nanoparticles. The protein quantity in collected aliquots was
analyzed by bicinchoninic acid and read using a Tecan Sunrise microplate reader (Tecan Group Ltd,
Morrisville, NC, USA). The protein released was also observed by Western blotting using the same
procedure as described above.
Stimulation of macrophages with nanoparticles
MouseJ774 macrophages were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Waldorf, MD, USA)
and propagated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s culture medium at 37°C in a
5% CO2 atmosphere.44
Macrophages (1 × 106/mL) were seeded in 12-well plates and stimulated with
PLGA-rMOMP 10 μg/mL in the presence or absence of polymyxin B 10 μg/mL for 24 hours
to determine the presence of any endotoxin activity. We elected to use PLGA-rMOMP at 10
μg/mL for this study because we previously observed that 10 μg/mL of purified rMOMP
elicited production of cytokines by mouseJ774 macrophages. Stimulation of macrophages with
lipopolysaccharide 1 μg/mL served as a control for these experiments. The supernatants were
collected by centrifugation after 24 hours and used to detect the interleukin (IL)-6 cytokine by
specific cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.44Confocal analysis was used to confirm visually the bioactivity of PLGA-rMOMP in triggering
secretion of IL-6 and IL-12p40 in macrophages. For these experiments, macrophages (1 ×
105/well) were seeded in eight-chamber well slides (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ,
USA) and stimulated for 24 hours with PLGA-rMOMP 10 μg/mL or the equivalent weight of
PLGA-PBS. The cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, fixed with paraformaldehyde for five
minutes at 37°C, permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X and then blocked for two hours
with 5% normal goat serum (Life Technologies). The cells were next stained with PE antimouse
IL-6 (BD Bioscience) or FITC antimouse IL-12p40 diluted in normal goat serum for one hour, washed,
and then counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) combined with antifade
mounting solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Cytokines were visualized using a Nikon Eclipse Ti confocal microscope (Nikon Instrument, Melville,
NY, USA).Because our previous study had revealed that as little as 1 μg/mL of a rMOMP peptide
encapsulated in PLGA induced cytokine responses in macrophages,44 we next determined the potentiating capacity of PLGA in the
encapsulated rMOMP formulation by performing dose-response kinetics experiments using a
concentration lower than 1 μg/mL of encapsulated rMOMP. Macrophages were either left
unexposed or exposed to various concentrations of PLGA-PBS or PLGA-rMOMP (0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100
ng/mL) or to rMOMP (0.5, 1, 10 and 20 μg/mL) for 24 hours, and the cell-free supernatants
were collected and used to quantify IL-12p40.44For some experiments, macrophages were stimulated with PLGA-PBS or PLGA-rMOMP and the cell-free
supernatants were used for simultaneous quantification of several cytokines (IL-10, IL-1α,
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IL-15, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor,
tumor necrosis factor) and chemokines (CCL4, CCL2, CCL5, CXCL5, CXCL10) using a multiplex
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). Data were acquired on
a Luminex 100 system and analyzed using Bio-Plex Manager software version 4.1 (BioRad).
In vivo studies
Mice and immunization
Female 6–8-week-old BALB/c mice (Charles Rivers, Raleigh, NC, USA) were used for this
study. The animal studies were performed following a protocol approved by the Alabama State
University institutional animal care and use committee. The mice were housed under standard
pathogen-free environmental conditions at ambient temperatures of 25°C, and provided with
sterile food and water ad libitum. Groups of mice (n = 3 per group) received three
immunizations at two-week intervals with phosphate-buffered saline, PLGA-PBS, or PLGA-rMOMP
according to the methods described by Singh et al,35 except via the subcutaneous route. Mice in the PLGA-rMOMP group were each immunized with
50 μg/200 μL of encapsulated rMOMP in phosphate-buffered saline, and those in the
PLGA-PBS group were immunized with an equivalent weight of PLGA-PBS nanoparticles. The control mice
were immunized with phosphate-buffered saline only. Two weeks following the last immunization, the
mice were sacrificed to collect blood and spleen tissue for antibody and cytokine analyses,
respectively.
Flow cytometry
Single spleen cell suspensions were obtained from mice two weeks following the last immunization
and pooled per group according to previous reports.47,48 Spleen cells (1 ×
106/mL) were blocked with Fc blocking antibody (BD Bioscience) in fluorescent-activated
cell sorting (FACS) buffer (phosphate-buffered saline, 0.1% NaN3, 1.0%
fetal bovine serum) for 15 minutes at 4°C. The cells were washed and stained with
fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against lymphocyte surface receptors, FITC-CD8, and PE-CD4 (BD
Biosciences) for 30 minutes at 4°C. The cells were then washed and fixed with 2%
paraformaldehyde solution for 20 minutes at 4°C. Data were acquired on a BD FACS Canto II
flow cytometer (BD Bioscience) with at least 1 × 105 events for each sample and
analyzed using Flo Jo software (Tree Star Inc, Ashland, OR, USA).
Quantification of cytokines
Spleen cell suspensions as collected above were pooled per group of mice and cultured as
described.47,48 Briefly, spleen cells (3 × 106/mL) were seeded
into 12-well flat bottom tissue culture plates and stimulated with various concentrations of
purified rMOMP (5 and 10 μg/mL) and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2
atmosphere. Cell-free supernatants were collected by centrifugation after 24 hours for
quantification of Th1/Th17 (IL-12p40), Th1 (interferon gamma [IFN-γ]), and
Th2 (IL-10 and IL-4) cytokines using specific cytokine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
Antibody determination
Sera collected two weeks following the last immunization from the groups of mice were pooled and
used to detect anti-rMOMP-specific antibody responses as previously described,35,49 except that 5
μg/mL of purified rMOMP was used to coat plates in the present study. To determine antibody
concentrations (titers), two-fold serial dilutions of serum were made and added to appropriate
wells, followed by addition of either horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antimouse
immunoglobulin (Ig) G, Ig2a, or IgG1 (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) antibody at a dilution
of1:2000. Plates were washed and developed using TMB substrate (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA).
Absorbance was read at 450 nm and the endpoint titer was considered to be the last serum dilution
with readings higher than the mean + 3 standard deviations of negative control sera.
Statistical analysis
Cytokine and antibody data were analyzed using the two-tailed unpaired Student’s
t-test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically
significant.
Results
Expression and purification of rMOMP
Expression of rMOMP in Rosetta (DE3) E. coli resulted in a protein of about 52
kDa extracted from the pellet as predicted from the molecular weight marker (Figure 1 A–C, lane 1). Pooled fractions were analyzed by sodium
dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (Figure 1A, lane 2). Purification of the pooled fractions
resulted in a protein band of about 52 kDa (Figure
1B, lane 2), corresponding to the expected size of rMOMP. Proteins transferred to the
nitrocellulose membrane and probed with anti-MOMP polyclonal antibodies confirmed the specificity of
purified rMOMP of about 52 kDa (Figure 1C, lane
2).
Figure 1
Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analyses of rMOMP.
Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis profiles of rMOMP (A) before
(lane 2), and (B) after purification (lane 2) run on precast
4%–20% gradient gels, molecular weight marker (lane 1). (C)
Western blot analysis of rMOMP, in which proteins were blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane and
probed with goat anti-MOMP antibodies (1:1000) followed by an Alexa Fluor 680 donkey antigoat
antibody (1:2000).
Notes: Bound antibody was visualized using an Odyssey imaging system. Molecular
weight marker (lane 1) and purified rMOMP corresponding to approximately 52 kDa (lane 2).
Abbreviation: rMOMP, recombinant major outer membrane protein.
Physical-structural characterization of nanoparticles
Previously we developed a modified w/o/w double emulsion technique by adding trehalose prior to
lyophilization for stabilization of nanoparticles.44 A schematic of the encapsulation of rMOMP in PLGA is depicted in Figure 2A. Use of this method in the present study aided the stability of
PLGA-rMOMP with a zeta potential of −14.3 mV as compared with −24.8 mV for PLGA-PBS,
with an encapsulation efficiency of approximately 60%, and average sizes of 224 nm
(PLGA-PBS) and 272 nm (PLGA-rMOMP, Table 1).
Figure 2
Physical-structural characterization of PLGA nanoparticles. Schematic representation of rMOMP
encapsulated in PLGA (A). The morphology and size of nanoparticles were observed using
high-resolution TEM or SEM, where one drop of the nanoparticles was deposited on a copper grid or
metal stub, respectively. The grids were allowed to dry for 10 minutes prior to imaging. The
nanoparticles have a diameter of 100–300 nm for PLGA-PBS (B and D)
and 300–500 nm for PLGA-rMOMP (C and E). Original magnification
for SEM was 20× and for TEM was 12×. (F) Ultraviolet visualization
absorbance spectra of rMOMP, PLGA-rMOMP, and PLGA-PBS were performed in deionized water at
25°C.
Abbreviations: rMOMP, recombinant major outer membrane protein; PLGA, poly D,
L-lactide-co-glycolide; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; SEM,
scanning electron microscopy.
Table 1
Nanoparticle size distribution, zeta potential, and encapsulation efficiency
Nanoparticles
Zeta sizer (nm)
Zeta potential (mV)
Encapsulation efficiency
PLGA-PBS
224 ± 46.7
−24.8 ± 2.5
?
PLGA-rMOMP
272 ± 48.85
−14.3 ± 0.8
60%
Note: Values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation for the zeta sizer
and zeta potential.
Both TEM and SEM analyses of PLGA-PBS (Figure 2B and
D) and PLGA-rMOMP (Figure 2C and E) revealed
the appearance of nanoparticles to be apparently more spherical with nanorange sizes
(100–300 nm), corroborating the zetasizer results. The nanoparticles appeared to be smooth
in shape and to have moderate uniformity. Further, as shown in Figure 2F, ultraviolet visualization of rMOMP showed protein absorption
at a wavelength of about 285 nm. In contrast, minimal to negligible absorption, respectively, was
seen on the outer surface for PLGA-rMOMP and PLGA-PBS, further validating the successful
encapsulation of rMOMP.
Release profile of rMOMP from PLGA nanoparticles
The cumulative release profile of rMOMP from PLGA-rMOMP nanoparticles over 15 days was one of a
slight initial burst followed by sustained release (Figure
3A) that is characteristic for polymer systems, as recently shown for a rMOMP peptide.44 Only 60% of the rMOMP was released over the
entire time period, thus indicating its slow release pattern. Supernatants collected from the
release studies were pooled and used for Western blotting to confirm the specificity of the protein
released. By probing with anti-MOMP polyclonal antibodies, it is evident (Figure 3B, lane 1) that a band at about 52 kDa was that of rMOMP. These
studies serve as further confirmation of the successful encapsulation and release of rMOMP from PLGA
nanoparticles.
Figure 3
In vitro release of rMOMP from encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles. (A) In vitro release
of rMOMP from PLGA-rMOMP in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.01% sodium azide
incubated at 37°C. (B) Supernatants collected from the release studies were
pooled and used for Western blotting by probing with anti-MOMP polyclonal antibodies; released rMOMP
(lane 1); purified rMOMP (lane 2); molecular weight marker (lane 3).
Note: Arrow corresponds to rMOMP of approximately 52 kDa.
PLGA-rMOMP induces cytokines and chemokines in vitro
We first documented that PLGA-rMOMP could interact with macrophages by stimulating production of
the IL-6 cytokine. Our results show that PLGA-rMOMP induced production of IL-6 by macrophages, which
was not attributed to contamination by endotoxins because no differences were seen in IL-6 levels in
the presence or absence of polymyxin B (Figure 4A).
In contrast, IL-6 induced by lipopolysaccharide stimulation of macrophages was significantly
(P < 0.05) reduced in the presence of polymyxin B (Figure 4A). By employing confocal microscopy we further confirmed the
slow release of encapsulated rMOMP by its ability to trigger the secretion of IL-6 (Figure 4B, red fluorescence) and IL-12p40 (Figure 4C, green fluorescence) in macrophages. No
expression of IL-6 or IL-12p40 was observed in macrophages exposed to the PLGA-PBS control
nanoparticles (data not shown).
Figure 4
PLGA-rMOMP stimulates production of cytokines by mouse J774 macrophages. (A)
Macrophages (1 × 106/mL) were seeded in 12-well plates and stimulated with
PLGA-rMOMP (10 μg/mL) in the presence and absence of polymyxin B at 10 μg/mL for 24
hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Stimulation of macrophages with
lipopolysaccharide (1 μg/mL) served as a control for these experiments. Cell-free
supernatants were collected by centrifugation and used to quantify interleukin-6 using an
antibody-capture specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Asterisk indicates significant
differences (P < 0.05) between levels of cytokine production in the
presence and absence of polymyxin B. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation of
duplicate samples. (B and C) After 24 hours of stimulating macrophages (1
× 105/well) in eight-well chamber slides with PLGA-rMOMP or PLGA-PBS, macrophages
were fixed, and stained with either a PE antimouse interleukin-6 (shown in red) or FITC-antimouse
IL-12 (shown in green) antibody, and nuclei were counterstained with
4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, shown in blue). (D and E)
Macrophages were visualized using confocal fluorescence microscopy at a magnification of
20×. Macrophages (1 × 106/mL) were stimulated with various concentrations
of PLGA-rMOMP (0.01, 0.10, 1, 10, and 100 ng/mL), PLGA-PBS (data not shown), or purified rMOMP (0.5,
1, 5, 10, and 20 μg/mL). After 24 hours, cell-free supernatants were harvested from culture
medium and analyzed for interleukin-12p40 by antibody-capture specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assays. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation of duplicate samples
representative of two independent experiments.
Recently we reported that PLGA potentiated the ability of a rMOMP peptide to induce production of
IL-6 and IL-12p40 cytokines by macrophages in vitro.44 In this study, we documented that IL-12p40 was optimally induced in macrophages at a
PLGA-rMOMP concentration of 100 ng/mL, but detected with a concentration as low as 10 ng/mL (Figure 4D). In comparison, a concentration of at least 1
μg/mL of purified rMOMP was needed to induce a similar level of IL-12p40 (Figure 4E). Neither PLGA-PBS nor unstimulated macrophages
induced IL-12p40 (data not shown). These studies show the potentiating effect of PLGA on the
capacity of the encapsulated rMOMP, at very low concentrations, to trigger production of IL-12p40 by
mouseJ774 macrophages.To probe further the potential of PLGA-rMOMP as a candidate vaccine, we then evaluated its
capacity to stimulate macrophages to produce other cytokines and chemokines, which are essential
components of any protective immune response. We showed that mouseJ774 macrophages stimulated with
100 ng/mL of PLGA-rMOMP produced significant (P ≤ 0.05) amounts of
anti-inflammatory (IL-10) and proinflammatory (IL-1α and tumor necrosis factor) cytokines
(Figure 5A and B). In addition, the encapsulated
rMOMP elicited significant (P ≤ 0.05) secretion of growth factor cytokines
(granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IL-15, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor,
Figure 5A and B) and copious levels of chemokines
(CCL4, CCL2, CXCL10, CXCL5, and CCL5, Figure 5C and
D). The PLGA-PBS control nanoparticles induced very weak and nonsignificant levels of
IL-1α, tumor necrosis factor, CCL2, and CCL4 (Figure 5A, B, and D). Spontaneous production of IL-15 (Figure 5A) and CXCL10 (Figure
5C) by macrophages was also observed. Overall, the above experiments demonstrate the
immunostimulatory potential of PLGA-rMOMP via its ability to trigger production of several major
cytokines and chemokines by macrophages in vitro.
Figure 5
PLGA-rMOMP stimulates production of cytokines and chemokines by mouse J774 macrophages.
Notes: Macrophages were stimulated with PLGA-rMOMP (100 ng/mL) and incubated as in
Figure 4. Cell-free supernatants were collected by
centrifugation and used to quantify cytokines (A and B) and chemokines
(C and D) using a multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Asterisk
indicates a significant difference in comparison with corresponding control (P
< 0.05). Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation of duplicate samples
representative of two independent experiments.
PLGA-rMOMP triggers elevated numbers of T cell subsets and Th1 cytokines in vivo
To evaluate the immunogenicity of the encapsulated rMOMP in vivo, groups of mice were immunized
subcutaneously with PLGA-rMOMP, PLGA-PBS, or phosphate-buffered saline, and spleen cells were then
collected for analysis of cellular responses. Our flow cytometry results revealed that ex vivo
spleen cells from PLGA-rMOMP-immunized mice contained elevated numbers of CD4+ and
CD8+ (34.82% and 14.77%, respectively) T cell subsets when compared with
mice given PLGA-PBS (22.19% and 8.99%) or those given phosphate-buffered saline
(24.91% and 9.83%, Figure 6). These
findings indicate that encapsulated rMOMP stimulates the expansion of CD4+ and CD8+
T cells in vivo.
Figure 6
Flow cytometric analyses of spleen CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets.
Notes: Groups of PLGA-rMOMP, PLGA-PBS, and PBS mice were immunized as indicated in
the Materials and methods section. Spleen cells (1 × 106/mL) collected two weeks
following the last immunization were used ex vivo to determine the percentages of CD4+ and
CD8+ T cell subsets by flow cytometry. Shown are the percentages for CD4+ (Q1),
CD4+CD8+ (Q2), CD8+ (Q3), and CD4−CD8− (Q4) cells for the
various groups. The cells were stained with PE anti-CD4 and FITC anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody
cocktail or with an isotype control cocktail antibody. Data were acquired on a BD FACS Canto II flow
cytometer with at least 1 × 105 events for each sample and analyzed using Flo Jo
software.
Abbreviations: PLGA, poly D, L-lactide-co-glycolide acid; PBS, phosphate-buffered
saline; rMOMP, recombinant major outer membrane protein; CD4, cluster of differentiation 4; CD8,
cluster of differentiation 8.
Given that Th1 cytokines are considered mandatory prerequisites for a desirable C.
trachomatis vaccine, we next evaluated the capacity of PLGA-rMOMP to trigger production of
select key Th1 cytokines in mice. Spleen cells from groups of immunized mice were restimulated with
purified rMOMP, and cell-free supernatants were used to quantify IL-12p40 (Th1/Th17) and
IFN-γ (Th1), as well as IL-4 (Th2) and IL-10 (Th2) cytokines using specific enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assays. Spleen cells from PLGA-rMOMP-immunized mice produced significantly
(P ≤ 0.05) more IL-12p40 (Figure
7A) and more IFN-γ (Figure 7B) when
restimulated with purified rMOMP at both 5 μg and 10 μg per mL as compared with the
control groups of mice. Stimulated spleen cells from PLGA-rMOMP-immunized mice also secreted
significant (P < 0.05) amounts of IL-10 (Figure 7C), but at lower levels in comparison with IL-12p40 and in
particular IFN-γ. IL-4 was undetectable (detection level 7.8 pg/mL) in the supernatants from
all groups of mice (data not shown). These results confirm the induction of a predominantly Th1
cytokine response triggered by encapsulated rMOMP in mice.
Figure 7
Th1 and Th2 cytokine production by spleen cells from immunized mice.
Notes: Mice in the PLGA-rMOMP and PLGA-PBS groups were immunized as indicated in the
Materials and methods section. Spleen cells (3 × 106/mL) collected from the mice
two weeks following the last immunization were seeded in 24-well plates and stimulated with media or
purified rMOMP (5 and 10 μg/mL) for 24 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2
atmosphere. Cell-free supernatants were collected by centrifugation and used to quantify
A and B Th1 (IL-12p40 and IFN-γ) and C Th2 (IL-10)
cytokines using an antibody-capture specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Asterisk indicates a
significant difference in comparison with the corresponding control (P <
0.05). Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation of duplicate samples representative
of two independent experiments.
PLGA-rMOMP triggers elevated Th1 antibody responses in vivo
Because antibodies are also of fundamental significance for protective immunity against
C. trachomatis, we collected pooled sera from all the groups of mice after the
final immunization to measure the isotypes and titers of rMOMP-specific antibodies by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay. Mice immunized with PLGA-rMOMP produced IgG, IgG2a (Th1), and IgG1 (Th2)
rMOMP-specific antibodies, which were present in significantly (P ≤ 0.05)
greater amounts than those produced by the PLGA-PBS control mice (Figure 8A). Moreover, levels of IgG2a were significantly
(P ≤ 0.05) higher than those of IgG1, with an IgG1 to IgG2a ratio of 0.25,
which is indicative of a primary Th1-driven antibody response. The levels of antibodies measured in
sera from the phosphate-buffered saline group (data not shown) mirrored those in the PLGA-PBS
group.
Figure 8
Production of Th1 and Th2 antibodies in sera from immunized mice. (A and
B) Groups of PLGA-rMOMP and PLGA-PBS mice were immunized as indicated in the Materials
and methods section. Pooled sera were collected two weeks following the last immunization and used
to determine IgG, IgG2a, and IgG1 responses in PLGA-rMOMP and PLGA-PBS mice at dilutions of 1:1600
and 1:100, respectively (A). Also shown are the reciprocal antibody titers for IgG,
IgG2a, and IgG1 in PLGA-rMOMP and PLGA-PBS-immunized mice (B). (C and
D) The groups of mice were immunized following the same immunization regimen as in the
Materials and methods section, except rMOMP was administered to mice in FIA. Serum IgG, IgG2a and
IgG1 responses (C) and reciprocal antibody titers (D) in FIA-PBS and
FIA-rMOMP-immunized mice.
Notes: To determine antibody concentrations (titers), two-fold serial dilutions of
serum were made and the endpoint titer was considered to be the last serum dilution with readings
higher than the mean + 3 standard deviations of negative controls. Anti-rMOMP-specific
antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Asterisk indicates a significant
difference in comparison with the corresponding control (P < 0.05). Each
bar represents the mean ± standard deviation of duplicate samples.
Abbreviations: PLGA, poly D, L-lactide-co-glycolide; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
rMOMP, recombinant major outer membrane protein; FIA, Freund’s incomplete adjuvant; IgG,
immunoglobulin G.
To define further the robustness of the rMOMP-specific antibodies, we next performed serial
two-fold dilutions of sera to determine isotype-specific antibody titers. As shown in Figure 8B, sera from the PLGA-rMOMP mice had higher
antibody titers overall to all isotypes in comparison with the control mice. Strikingly, PLGA-rMOMP
elicited a 64-fold higher IgG2a than IgG1 antibody titer in immunized mice. To confirm the ability
of the PLGA-rMOMP formulation to drive Th1 antibody responses, we also collected sera from mice
following the same immunization regimen, but instead administered rMOMP in Freund’s adjuvant
to the mice. Our results show that sera from these mice produced heightened levels of IgG, IgG2a,
and IgG1 rMOMP-specific antibodies (Figure 8C), but
with an IgG1 to IgG2a ratio of 0.54. Results from the antibody titer study revealed only a four-fold
higher IgG2a versus IgG1 antibody titer (Figure 8D).
These findings confirm the ability of PLGA-rMOMP to drive not only Th1 cellular responses but also
Th1 antibody responses, which are both potentiated by PLGA.
Discussion
Development of a vaccine against C. trachomatis is considered to be the best way
to prevent and control this major bacterial sexually transmitted infection. Earlier first-generation
vaccines focused on live, inactivated, or attenuated whole C. trachomatis,14–20 which gave undesirable results and were associated with major pathological issues.
Second-generation vaccines are subunit immunogens, such as proteins, DNA, RNA, or oligonucleotides,
and have been shown to be very promising.21–35 However, these
second-generation vaccines need effective delivery systems to protect their respective immunogens
from rapid degradation and to potentiate immunological responses. Biodegradable nanoparticles used
as immune potentiators and delivery systems are now playing an increasing role in next-generation
vaccine development projects.36–45Previously we showed that a PLGA-encapsulated rMOMP peptide induced Th1 responses in vitro which
were potentiated by the presence of PLGA,44
suggesting that this may be an effective delivery system for a C. trachomatis
vaccine. In the present study, we explored further the effectiveness of PLGA as an immune
potentiator and vaccine delivery system by encapsulating the full-length rMOMP in PLGA and
investigating this formulation by in vitro and in vivo studies. Our results revealed the following:
PLGA-rMOMP was smooth and spherical in shape, small in size at about 200–300 nm, with a zeta
potential of 14.30 mV, an encapsulation efficiency of about 60%, and a slow-release pattern;
PLGA potentiated the ability of encapsulated rMOMP to trigger production of a variety of cytokines
and chemokines by macrophages in vitro; PLGA-rMOMP triggered expansion of T cell subsets and
production of primarily rMOMP-specific Th1 cytokines in immunized mice; and sera from
PLGA-rMOMP-immunized mice had increased levels of rMOMP-specific Th1 antibodies.One concern with encapsulating proteins in PLGA using the w/o/w emulsion is the generation of
heat, which poses a major risk to proteins, and increases the chances of instability, degradation,
and interaction with organic solvents.43,50 In the present study, addition of a stabilizer to the
polymer suspension resulted in a high encapsulation efficiency and enabled a slow-release profile
for the encapsulated rMOMP. A study by Jaganatha et al51 showed that addition of stabilizers allows for a more stable encapsulant, higher
encapsulation efficiency, and an extended and slow-release profile. Another concern regarding
nanoparticle formulations is the value of the zeta potential, which is important for understanding
and predicting the long-term stability and mucoadhesion of nanoparticles.52 In theory, the more negative or positive the zeta potential, the more
stable the nanoparticle suspension. Mucoadhesion, on the other hand, is promoted by the presence of
positive charge groups.52 Our results show that
PLGA-rMOMP was stable and had a negative surface charge of −14.30 mV, which may be
attributed to the addition of polyvinyl alcohol to the suspension. A study by Kumar et al53 showed that particles made with polyvinyl alcohol
alone were negatively charged and those made with a blend of polyvinyl alcohol-chitosan were more
positively charged.The results of the release study also showed an initial burst release of rMOMP from PLGA-rMOMP
followed by a gradual slow release, which is consistent with our previous study.44 Most studies attribute an initial burst release to
outer protein adsorption,54 but our ultraviolet
visualization data support that rMOMP is indeed encapsulated in the PLGA nanoparticle, and suggest
that the initial burst and sustained release of rMOMP from PLGA-rMOMP may be due to the overall
degradation kinetics of PLGA in solution.Here, as documented, the release of rMOMP from PLGA was validated by its interaction with
macrophages in triggering production of IL-6 and IL-12p40 cytokines, which are important in the host
defense against chlamydial infection as well as other infections.7,55–58 Further, PLGA potentiated production of selected
IL-12p40 cytokines because a higher concentration of rMOMP was required to induce similar levels of
this cytokine. Moreover, contamination by lipopolysaccharide was not responsible for production of
these cytokines, as demonstrated in the polymyxin B experiments. It is of interest to note that our
multiplex data also revealed significant secretion of several cytokines and chemokines. Although
inflammation is generally considered a double-edged sword, contributing to both host defense and
tissue damage, in this study these proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1α, tumor necrosis factor)
and chemokines (CCL4, CCL2, CXCL10, CXCL5, CL5) played an active role in recruiting a variety of
immune cells (monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, and memory
T cells) to the site of infection or inflammation.59,60 Further, we observed significant
secretion of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IL-15, and granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor, which stimulate cell growth factors, such as survival, proliferation, or
differentiation of precursors needed by immune cells.59,60 These results corroborate the
immunostimulatory and immune-potentiating properties of PLGA,39–44 and
indicate that PLGA-rMOMP could effectively activate T and B cells and induce humoral-mediated and
cell-mediated immune responses in mice.Activation and expansion of T cells is important in generating both humoral-mediated and
cell-mediated immune responses, which are critical for limiting replication and clearance of
intracellular pathogens.7,54–57 In this
study, we showed that encapsulation of rMOMP in PLGA 50:50 was effective in producing Th1 immune
responses by proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ subsets of T cells. Th1 cells such as
CD4+ and CD8+ enhance the cell-mediated immune response via synthesis of Th1
cytokines (IL-12p40 and IFN-γ) which are essential for resolving primary infection and/or
resisting infection60–63 via activation of phagocytes that limit the extent of
infection. Lu and Zhong64 observed that mice
deficient in IL-12p40 failed to induce strong protection against chlamydial infection. Another study
found that IFN-γ receptor-deficient mice were unable to develop protective immunity against
C. trachomatis.65 Similar effects
were also observed in IFN-γ knockout mice which showed more disseminated and longer lasting
C. trachomatis infection when compared with wild-type mice,66 thus showing the importance of these cytokines in clearance of
chlamydial infection. The high levels of production of IL-12p40 and IFN-γ observed in the
present study substantiates further the immunogenic potential of PLGA-rMOMP as a candidate
nanovaccine.Further assessment of isotype antibodies revealed that PLGA-rMOMP induced markedly higher levels
of Th1 (IgG2a) than of Th2 (IgG1) rMOMP-specific antibodies, which was not observed in mice
immunized with rMOMP in Freund’s complete adjuvant. Stimulation of IgG2a antibody has been
shown to be associated with protection against Chlamydia infection,67 although the precise contribution of antibodies to
this protection is still not completely understood. Nonetheless, strong evidence from studies does
suggest that antibodies could play a role in resistance to reinfection68 or in blocking attachment of C. trachomatis to
epithelial cells.69 Overall, the presence of
predominantly Th1 immune responses triggered by PLGA-rMOMP in mice provides compelling evidence to
suggest that perhaps these responses may be sufficient to render protective resistance against
C. trachomatis infection.Despite decades of effort in development of a C. trachomatis vaccine, there is
still no effective vaccine against this pathogen. To our knowledge, our study is the first to
document encapsulation of full-length rMOMP in PLGA 50:50 nanoparticles, to conduct
physical-structural characterization studies, and to evaluate its immunogenicity comprehensively by
both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Here we have documented that full rMOMP can be successfully
encapsulated in PLGA using a variety of nanotechnology techniques. We show that PLGA potentiates the
immune response because it enhances the ability of encapsulated rMOMP to trigger production of
cytokines and chemokines in macrophages. Importantly, PLGA-rMOMP was found to be immunogenic in mice
because it stimulated expansion of T cells and heightened T cell and B cell Th1 immune responses,
which are all desirable for protective immunity against C. trachomatis. Our data
highlight the effectiveness of PLGA as a delivery system for development of a C.
trachomatis vaccine. PLGA-rMOMP holds promise as a candidate nanovaccine, and warrants
efficacy studies in mice.
Authors: E Honey; C Augood; A Templeton; I Russell; J Paavonen; P-A Mårdh; A Stary; B Stray-Pedersen Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: L Ortiz; K P Demick; J W Petersen; M Polka; R A Rudersdorf; B Van der Pol; R Jones; M Angevine; R DeMars Journal: J Immunol Date: 1996-11-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Madhulika Jupelli; M Neal Guentzel; Patricia A Meier; Guangming Zhong; Ashlesh K Murthy; Bernard P Arulanandam Journal: J Immunol Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Saurabh Dixit; Rajnish Sahu; Richa Verma; Skyla Duncan; Guillermo H Giambartolomei; Shree R Singh; Vida A Dennis Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Muhammad Haseeb; Jianmei Huang; Shakeel Ahmed Lakho; Zhang Yang; Muhammad Waqqas Hasan; Muhammad Ehsan; Muhammad Tahir Aleem; Muhammad Ali Memon; Haider Ali; Xiaokai Song; Ruofeng Yan; Lixin Xu; Xiangrui Li Journal: Parasitol Res Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 2.289
Authors: Rajnish Sahu; Richa Verma; Saurabh Dixit; Joseph U Igietseme; Carolyn M Black; Skyla Duncan; Shree R Singh; Vida A Dennis Journal: Expert Rev Vaccines Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 5.217
Authors: Saurabh Dixit; Shree R Singh; Abebayehu N Yilma; Ronald D Agee; Murtada Taha; Vida A Dennis Journal: Nanomedicine Date: 2014-03-04 Impact factor: 5.307