Literature DB >> 23785064

Stereoselective inhibition of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 by fluoxetine and its metabolite: implications for risk assessment of multiple time-dependent inhibitor systems.

Justin D Lutz1, Brooke M VandenBrink, Katipudi N Babu, Wendel L Nelson, Kent L Kunze, Nina Isoherranen.   

Abstract

Recent guidance on drug-drug interaction (DDI) testing recommends evaluation of circulating metabolites. However, there is little consensus on how to quantitatively predict and/or assess the risk of in vivo DDIs by multiple time-dependent inhibitors (TDIs) including metabolites from in vitro data. Fluoxetine was chosen as the model drug to evaluate the role of TDI metabolites in DDI prediction because it is a TDI of both CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 with a circulating N-dealkylated inhibitory metabolite, norfluoxetine. In pooled human liver microsomes, both enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were TDIs of CYP2C19, (S)-norfluoxetine was the most potent inhibitor with time-dependent inhibition affinity constant (KI) of 7 μM, and apparent maximum time-dependent inhibition rate (k(inact,app)) of 0.059 min(-1). Only (S)-fluoxetine and (R)-norfluoxetine were TDIs of CYP3A4, with (R)-norfluoxetine being the most potent (K(I) = 8 μM, and k(inact,app) = 0.011 min(-1)). Based on in-vitro-to-in-vivo predictions, (S)-norfluoxetine plays the most important role in in vivo CYP2C19 DDIs, whereas (R)-norfluoxetine is most important in CYP3A4 DDIs. Comparison of two multiple TDI prediction models demonstrated significant differences between them in in-vitro-to-in-vitro predictions but not in in-vitro-to-in-vivo predictions. Inclusion of all four inhibitors predicted an in vivo decrease in CYP2C19 (95%) and CYP3A4 (60-62%) activity. The results of this study suggest that adequate worst-case risk assessment for in vivo DDIs by multiple TDI systems can be achieved by incorporating time-dependent inhibition by both parent and metabolite via simple addition of the in vivo time-dependent inhibition rate/cytochrome P450 degradation rate constant (λ/k(deg)) values, but quantitative DDI predictions will require a more thorough understanding of TDI mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23785064      PMCID: PMC3834134          DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.052639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  42 in total

Review 1.  Mechanism-based inactivation of cytochrome P450 enzymes: chemical mechanisms, structure-activity relationships and relationship to clinical drug-drug interactions and idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Amit S Kalgutkar; R Scott Obach; Tristan S Maurer
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  (R)-, (S)-, and racemic fluoxetine N-demethylation by human cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Authors:  J M Margolis; J P O'Donnell; D C Mankowski; S Ekins; R S Obach
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.922

3.  Pharmacokinetic Interaction between amprenavir and rifabutin or rifampin in healthy males.

Authors:  R E Polk; D F Brophy; D S Israel; R Patron; B M Sadler; G E Chittick; W T Symonds; Y Lou; D Kristoff; D S Stein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Mechanism-based inactivation of CYP3A by HIV protease inhibitors.

Authors:  C Steven Ernest; Stephen D Hall; David R Jones
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2004-11-02       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Prediction of time-dependent CYP3A4 drug-drug interactions: impact of enzyme degradation, parallel elimination pathways, and intestinal inhibition.

Authors:  Aleksandra Galetin; Howard Burt; Laura Gibbons; J Brian Houston
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.922

6.  Mechanism-based inactivation of human cytochrome p450 enzymes and the prediction of drug-drug interactions.

Authors:  R Scott Obach; Robert L Walsky; Karthik Venkatakrishnan
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 3.922

7.  An in vitro mechanistic study to elucidate the desipramine/bupropion clinical drug-drug interaction.

Authors:  Melinda J Reese; Robert M Wurm; Keith T Muir; Grant T Generaux; Lisa St John-Williams; Donavon J McConn
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  Plasma concentrations of the enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine: sources of variability and preliminary observations on relations with clinical response.

Authors:  Giovanna Jannuzzi; Giuliana Gatti; Paolo Magni; Edoardo Spina; Roberta Pacifici; Piergiorgio Zuccaro; Riccardo Torta; Laura Guarneri; Emilio Perucca
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Multiple inhibition mechanisms and prediction of drug-drug interactions: status of metabolism and transporter models as exemplified by gemfibrozil-drug interactions.

Authors:  Laura K Hinton; Aleksandra Galetin; J Brian Houston
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Drug-drug interactions via mechanism-based cytochrome P450 inactivation: points to consider for risk assessment from in vitro data and clinical pharmacologic evaluation.

Authors:  Karthik Venkatakrishnan; R Scott Obach
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.731

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fluoxetine- and norfluoxetine-mediated complex drug-drug interactions: in vitro to in vivo correlation of effects on CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4.

Authors:  J E Sager; J D Lutz; R S Foti; C Davis; K L Kunze; N Isoherranen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Quantitative Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Inhibitory Metabolites in Drug Development: How Can Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Help?

Authors:  I E Templeton; Y Chen; J Mao; J Lin; H Yu; S Peters; M Shebley; M V Varma
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-19

Review 3.  Assessing the Mechanism of Fluoxetine-Mediated CYP2D6 Inhibition.

Authors:  Malavika Deodhar; Sweilem B Al Rihani; Lucy Darakjian; Jacques Turgeon; Veronique Michaud
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 6.321

4.  Head-to-Head Comparison of Sedation and Somnolence Among 37 Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depression, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Delirium, and Repurposed in COVID-19, Infectious Diseases, and Oncology From the FAERS, 2004-2020.

Authors:  Andy R Eugene; Beata Eugene; Marek Masiak; Jolanta Sylwia Masiak
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.810

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.