Literature DB >> 23784313

Commentary on "meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC)" by Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G, et al. (J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:1790-1801).

Anders Mark Christensen1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23784313     DOI： 10.1007/s11605-013-2245-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN： 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Melissa S Phillips; Jeffrey M Marks; Kurt Roberts; Roberto Tacchino; Raymond Onders; George DeNoto; Homero Rivas; Arsalla Islam; Nathaniel Soper; Gary Gecelter; Eugene Rubach; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Sajani Shah
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC).

Authors:  Adolfo Pisanu; Isabella Reccia; Giulia Porceddu; Alessandro Uccheddu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.