Literature DB >> 23783171

Comparison of calibrated dilute thrombin time and aPTT tests with LC-MS/MS for the therapeutic monitoring of patients treated with dabigatran etexilate.

J Douxfils1, J-M Dogné, F Mullier, B Chatelain, Y Rönquist-Nii, R E Malmström, P Hjemdahl.   

Abstract

Ways to monitor dabigatran etexilate (DE) therapy would be useful in certain situations. Functional assays such as aPTT or Hemoclot® Thrombin Inhibitor (HTI) have been proposed to evaluate dabigatran concentrations, but previous findings are based on in vitro studies and results must be confirmed in clinical samples. The aim of this study was to compare aPTT and HTI measurements with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measurements of dabigatran in plasma samples from DE treated patients. Seventy-one plasma samples were included. aPTT was performed using STA-CKPrest® and SynthASil®. HTI was performed according to instructions from the manufacturer. The LC-MS/MS method utilised dabigatran-d3 as internal standard. The plasma concentration range was 0 to 645 ng/ml as measured by LC-MS/MS. Overall, the HTI and LC-MS/MS analyses correlated well (r²=0.97). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 9 ng/ml (SD: 20 ng/ml). However, the HTI performed poorly at concentrations <50 ng/ml. LC-MS/MS was sensitive (limit of quantification 1.1 ng/ml) and specific for dabigatran. The aPTT methods did not correlate well with plasma concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS (r² = 0.59 with SynthASil® and 0.50 with STA-CKPrest®). In conclusion, the poor sensitivity, the important inter-individual variability, and the poor correlation with LC-MS/MS preclude the use of aPTT to estimate dabigatran concentrations. Due to its small inter-individual variability and good agreement with LC-MS/MS measurements, we recommend the use of HTI assays to rather accurately estimate concentrations of dabigatran >50 ng/ml. Quantification of lower dabigatran levels in DE-treated patients requires the "reference" LC-MS/MS method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23783171     DOI: 10.1160/TH13-03-0202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  21 in total

1.  [Monitoring of NOAC].

Authors:  R B Zotz; L Weißbach
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 2.  Laboratory Assessment of the Anticoagulant Activity of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bethany T Samuelson; Adam Cuker; Deborah M Siegal; Mark Crowther; David A Garcia
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Coagulation assays and plasma fibrinogen concentrations in real-world patients with atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran.

Authors:  Paul K L Chin; David M Patterson; Mei Zhang; Berit P Jensen; Daniel F B Wright; Murray L Barclay; Evan J Begg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Position Paper on laboratory testing for patients on direct oral anticoagulants. A Consensus Document from the SISET, FCSA, SIBioC and SIPMeL.

Authors:  Armando Tripodi; Walter Ageno; Marcello Ciaccio; Cristina Legnani; Giuseppe Lippi; Cesare Manotti; Rossella Marcucci; Marco Moia; Benedetto Morelli; Daniela Poli; Agostino Steffan; Sophie Testa
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Direct-acting oral anticoagulant drug level monitoring in clinical patient management.

Authors:  Amihai Rottenstreich; Netanel Zacks; Geffen Kleinstern; Bruria Hirsh Raccah; Batia Roth; Nael Da'as; Yosef Kalish
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  [Coagulation diagnostics in the clinical routine-part 2 : Monitoring of anticoagulation treatment, new-onset thrombocytopenia and thrombophilia].

Authors:  Michael Metze; Martin Platz; Christian Pfrepper; Sirak Petros
Journal:  Inn Med (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-05-19

Review 7.  Measurement and reversal of the direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Bethany T Samuelson; Adam Cuker
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  Relationship between plasma dabigatran concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Daiki Shimomura; Yoshihisa Nakagawa; Hirokazu Kondo; Toshihiro Tamura; Masashi Amano; Yukiko Hayama; Naoaki Onishi; Yodo Tamaki; Makoto Miyake; Kazuaki Kaitani; Chisato Izumi; Masahiko Hayashida; Aya Fukuda; Fumihiko Nakamura; Seiji Kawano
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2014-12-18

Review 9.  A proposal for dose-adjustment of dabigatran etexilate in atrial fibrillation guided by thrombin time.

Authors:  Paul K L Chin; Daniel F B Wright; David M Patterson; Matthew P Doogue; Evan J Begg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Plasma clot formation and clot lysis to compare effects of different anticoagulation treatments on hemostasis in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Oliver Königsbrügge; Günter Weigel; Peter Quehenberger; Ingrid Pabinger; Cihan Ay
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.