| Literature DB >> 23783070 |
Wendy A Keitel1, ZhongDong Dai, Robert W Awe, Robert L Atmar, Sheldon Morris, Rachel Schneerson, John B Robbins.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of the surface capsular polysaccharides (CPs) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in the pathogenesis of infection and disease, as well their potential for use as diagnostic reagents and vaccine antigens, are unknown.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23783070 PMCID: PMC3722012 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Characterization of enrolled subjects
| 0 | 11 | 6:5 | 44.9 (10) | 4:4:3:0 |
| 1 | 11 | 7:4 | 37.6 (11.2) | 3:5:3:0 |
| 2 | 11 | 6:5 | 43.6 (10) | 4:4:2:1 |
| 3 | 10 | 4:6 | 45.9 (14.3) | 3:3:4:0 |
| 4 | 9 | 1:8 | 43.0 (4.8) | 1:6:1:1 |
Abbreviations: F Female, M Male, C Caucasian, AA African-American, H Hispanic, A Asian.
* p=NS between groups; ANOVA.
Median serum antibody levels (range) against capsular polysaccharides of (arabinomannan and glucan) according to TB class
| | ||||||
| 0 | 8.6 | 3.3 | 163 | 7.9 | 0.7 | 6.3 |
| (2.98–21.7) | (1.05–11.1) | (11.5–262) | (1.4–21.0) | (0.01–2.6) | (0.12–38.5) | |
| 1 | 9.2 | 2.2 | 184 | 7.8 | 0.7 | 8.3 |
| (1.5–45.7) | (1.0–10.1) | (81.4–4262) | (1.6–26.7) | (0.3–5.6) | (1.0–137) | |
| 2 | 7.1 | 8.2 | 271 | 10.9 | 1.2 | 19.2 |
| (4.1–55.7) | (2.0–135) | (154–1222) | (1.0–18.4) | (0.6–5.3) | (2.2–48.4) | |
| 3 | 7.4 | 7.7 | 1181b | 5.5 | 3.3b | 23.3 |
| (1.0–42.3) | (2.2–42.9) | (89.3–4227) | (1.9–32.7) | (1.5–38.5) | (3.2–464) | |
| 4 | 8.9 | 11.5b | 524b | 10.7 | 5.2b | 43.4 |
| (3.1–30.5) | (3.1–24.6) | (189–1301) | (2.0–62.3) | (0.3–16.9) | (0.4–240) | |
a p≤0.01, Kruskal–Wallis test (with group 0 as control group).
b p<0.05; Dunn’s post–hoc test adjusted for multiple comparisons.
Figure 1Panel A shows antibody titers against glucan and panel B shows antibody titers against arabinomannan. KW is Kruskal-Wallis and significant P values are indicated for across group comparisons. Significant results for Dunn’s post-hoc analysis between groups are indicated by asterisks (within a test, groups with the same number of asterisks are significantly [p<0.05] different from each other). Group 0 is not infected and not exposed; group 1 is exposed, not infected; group 2 is latent tuberculosis; group 3 is active tuberculosis; and group 4 is previously documented active tuberculosis without evidence of current disease.