Literature DB >> 23783046

Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement is associated with a higher risk of postoperative urinary retention.

Paul J Smith1, Steven J Hudak, J Francis Scott, Lee C Zhao, Allen F Morey.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To explore the association of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff sizes and placement techniques with the development of postoperative urinary retention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the outcomes of AUS cases performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary referral center from 2007-2010. Outcomes relating to urinary retention and suprapubic tube placement were analyzed in three groups: those with 3.5 cm cuff placement, ≥ 4 cm cuff placement, and transcorporal cuff (TC) placement of any size.
RESULTS: Among 139 patients who underwent AUS placement from 2007-2010, 117 cases met inclusion criteria - 42 men received a 3.5 cm cuff, 53 received a ≥ 4 cm cuff, and 22 received a TC cuff (all ≥ 4 cm). TC patients had a significantly higher rate of urinary retention compared to the ≥ 4 cm group [7/22 (32%) versus 4/53 (8%), p = 0.02] as well as a higher rate of SPT placement [6/22 (27%) versus 1/53 (2%), p = 0.007].
CONCLUSIONS: Transcorporal cuff placement is associated with a significantly higher rate of urinary retention and suprapubic tube placement compared to traditional 4 cm cuff placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23783046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Urol        ISSN: 1195-9479            Impact factor:   1.344


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Approach to the Evaluation and Management of the Failed Artificial Urinary Sphincter.

Authors:  Amy D Dobberfuhl; Craig V Comiter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Transcroporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement With Closure of Corporal Bodies-A Long-Term Analysis of Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Valentin Maurer; Roland Dahlem; Marian Howaldt; Silke Riechardt; Margit Fisch; Tim A Ludwig; Oliver Engel
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Artificial urinary sphincter placement in compromised urethras and survival: a comparison of virgin, radiated and reoperative cases.

Authors:  James B McGeady; Jack W McAninch; Mathew D Truesdale; Sarah D Blaschko; Stacey Kenfield; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Risk factors for erosion of artificial urinary sphincters: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  William O Brant; Bradley A Erickson; Sean P Elliott; Christopher Powell; Nejd Alsikafi; Christopher McClung; Jeremy B Myers; Bryan B Voelzke; Thomas G Smith; Joshua A Broghammer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Artificial sphincter "BR - SL - AS 904" in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study.

Authors:  Salvador Vilar Correia Lima; Evandilson Guenes Campos de Barros; Fabio de Oliveira Vilar; Flavia Cristina Morone Pinto; Thomé Décio Pinheiro Barros; José Carlos Truzzi; Luiz Gustavo M de Toledo; Francisco Kanasiro; João Luiz Amaro
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 6.  Artificial urinary sphincter.

Authors:  William O Brant; Francisco E Martins
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.