| Literature DB >> 23782909 |
Alejandro A Gru1, Friederike Kreisel, Eric Duncavage, TuDung T Nguyen, Anjum Hassan, John L Frater.
Abstract
We present the case of a 30 year-old man who was referred for evaluation of diffuse lymphadenopathy. Six weeks prior, he noticed darkening of his urine associated with pale stools, nausea and an eventual 30 lb weight loss within a month. The initial laboratory findings showed elevation of the liver enzymes. A CT scan showed mesenteric and periaortic lymphadenopathy with the largest lymph node measuring 2.8 cm. Other laboratory results were otherwise unremarkable (including a normal LDH) with the exception of positive serum antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated antigens (IgM+ and IgG+). An excisional biopsy of 4 of the small neck lymph nodes showed a normal architecture with prominent follicles and an intact capsule. But, by immunohistochemistry two of the follicles showed aberrant coexpression of BCL-2, in addition to CD10 and BCL-6. In-situ hybridization for early Epstein-Barr virus mRNA (EBER) and immunohistochemistry for latent membrane protein-1 (LMP-1) stained both scattered positive cells, as well as BCL-2 positive B-cells. Although an original diagnosis of in-situ follicular lymphoma was favored at an outside facility, additional interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies for t(14;18);(IGH-BCL2) rearrangement (performed on the BCL-2 + follicles microdissected from the tissue block; Abott probe dual colour fusion) and molecular studies (IGH gene rearrangement by PCR, also performed on the microdissected follicles) were negative. Serologic studies (positive EBV antibodies) and immunostains in conjunction with the molecular studies confirmed the reactive nature of the changes. Our case also shows direct immunopathogenic evidence of BCL-2 expression among the EBV-infected cells, which has to our knowledge not been previously documented in vivo. A diagnosis of EBV infection should, therefore, be considered when confronted with BCL-2 expression in germinal centers, particularly in younger individuals, as the diagnosis of FLIS may lead to extensive and invasive haematologic work-ups. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1323656318940068.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23782909 PMCID: PMC3874606 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Figure 1Excisional (1st) biopsy from cervical lymph node. a and b – low power view. Reactive appearing follicles with preserved architecture. c – infarcted lymph node with occasional large cells with prominent nucleoli on high magnification. d – CD20. e – CD3. f – BCL-2. g – BCL-6. h – EBER and LMP-1.
Figure 2Excisional (2nd) biopsy from inguinal lymph node. a – lymph node, second biopsy at low power showing similar morphologic findings. b – CD3. c - CD20. d – BCL-2. e – BCL-6. f – CD10. The arrows indicate the abnormal phenotype in some of the follicles. g and h – FISH using Vysis dual color-fusion probes for IGH-BCL-2 with no evidence of rearrangement.