Literature DB >> 23782597

What determines species richness of parasitic organisms? A meta-analysis across animal, plant and fungal hosts.

Tsukushi Kamiya1, Katie O'Dwyer, Shinichi Nakagawa, Robert Poulin.   

Abstract

Although a small set of external factors account for much of the spatial variation in plant and animal diversity, the search continues for general drivers of variation in parasite species richness among host species. Qualitative reviews of existing evidence suggest idiosyncrasies and inconsistent predictive power for all proposed determinants of parasite richness. Here, we provide the first quantitative synthesis of the evidence using a meta-analysis of 62 original studies testing the relationship between parasite richness across animal, plant and fungal hosts, and each of its four most widely used presumed predictors: host body size, host geographical range size, host population density, and latitude. We uncover three universal predictors of parasite richness across host species, namely host body size, geographical range size and population density, applicable regardless of the taxa considered and independently of most aspects of study design. A proper match in the primary studies between the focal predictor and both the spatial scale of study and the level at which parasite species richness was quantified (i.e. within host populations or tallied across a host species' entire range) also affected the magnitude of effect sizes. By contrast, except for a couple of indicative trends in subsets of the full dataset, there was no strong evidence for an effect of latitude on parasite species richness; where found, this effect ran counter to the general latitude gradient in diversity, with parasite species richness tending to be higher further from the equator. Finally, the meta-analysis also revealed a negative relationship between the magnitude of effect sizes and the year of publication of original studies (i.e. a time-lag bias). This temporal bias may be due to the increasing use of phylogenetic correction in comparative analyses of parasite richness over time, as this correction yields more conservative effect sizes. Overall, these findings point to common underlying processes of parasite diversification fundamentally different from those controlling the diversity of free-living organisms.
© 2013 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2013 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body size; geographical range; latitude; meta-analysis; phylogenetic influences; population density

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23782597     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  45 in total

1.  The effects of environment, hosts and space on compositional, phylogenetic and functional beta-diversity in two taxa of arthropod ectoparasites.

Authors:  Boris R Krasnov; Georgy I Shenbrot; Natalia P Korallo-Vinarskaya; Maxim V Vinarski; Elizabeth M Warburton; Irina S Khokhlova
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Anuran's habitat use drives the functional diversity of nematode parasite communities.

Authors:  Lorena Euclydes; Amanda Caroline Dudczak; Karla Magalhães Campião
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Parasites of Urophycis brasiliensis (Gadiformes: Phycidae) as indicators of marine ecoregions in coastal areas of the South American Atlantic.

Authors:  Aldenice N Pereira; Camila Pantoja; José L Luque; Juan T Timi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Spatio-temporal variation and the use of host body surface by ectoparasites of the chelonians Phrynops geoffroanus and Mesoclemmys tuberculata in areas of the Caatinga and Atlantic Forest in northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Daniel O Santana; Rafael Eiji Iwama; Adonias A M Teixeira; Geraldo J B Moura; Renato G Faria; Daniel O Mesquita
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 5.  Trematodes of fishes of the Indo-west Pacific: told and untold richness.

Authors:  Thomas H Cribb; Rodney A Bray; Pablo E Diaz; Daniel C Huston; Olena Kudlai; Storm B Martin; Russell Q-Y Yong; Scott C Cutmore
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.431

6.  What would it take to describe the global diversity of parasites?

Authors:  Colin J Carlson; Tad A Dallas; Laura W Alexander; Alexandra L Phelan; Anna J Phillips
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Large-scale disease patterns explained by climatic seasonality and host traits.

Authors:  Antoine Filion; Alan Eriksson; Fátima Jorge; Chris N Niebuhr; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Parasite richness and abundance within aquatic macroinvertebrates: testing the roles of host- and habitat-level factors.

Authors:  Travis McDevitt-Galles; Dana Marie Calhoun; Pieter T J Johnson
Journal:  Ecosphere       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.171

9.  Monorchiid trematodes of the painted sweetlips, Diagramma labiosum (Perciformes: Haemulidae), from the southern Great Barrier Reef, including a new genus and three new species.

Authors:  Emily L Searle; Scott C Cutmore; Thomas H Cribb
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.431

10.  Endohelminths in Bird Hosts from Northern California and an Analysis of the Role of Life History Traits on Parasite Richness.

Authors:  Emily R Hannon; John M Kinsella; Dana M Calhoun; Maxwell B Joseph; Pieter T J Johnson
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 1.276

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.