Literature DB >> 23782595

Impact of low versus high fluidic settings on the efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification.

Sabine M Schriefl1, Eva Stifter, Rupert Menapace.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare intraoperative efficiency and postoperative outcomes of cataract surgery with low and high fluidic settings.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study, 114 eyes of 57 patients were operated with low fluidic settings for one eye (group I) and high fluidic settings for the other eye (group II). Efficiency was judged as metred surgery time, effective phacoemulsification time (EPT) and the amount of balanced salt solution used. Visual outcome and endothelial cell count were determined 1 week and 18 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The overall effective phacoemulsification energy was statistically significantly lower (p = 0.003) in group II than in group I. Conquest of the nuclei was achieved with about two-thirds of the energy needed in group I, with 6.59 ± 4.79 effective ultrasound energy compared with 3.99 ± 3.18 (p = 0.001). Overall, about 12% more solution was used in group II than in group I. Median visual acuity was 1.0 for both groups 18 months after surgery. The mean endothelial cell loss was 5.0% in eyes in group I compared with 6.3% in eyes in group II (p > 0.5).
CONCLUSION: Switching from low fluidic settings with a conventional coaxial 20G phacoemulsification tip to higher fluidic settings with a microcoaxial phaco tip statistically significantly decreases EPT. As only marginally more solution was used with the higher aspiration flow, occlusion must be accomplished more often with high than with low fluidics. Aspiration of the quadrants was therefore more efficient with high fluidic settings. The enhanced pump speed did not result in more tissue damage.
© 2013 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract surgery; cataract surgery outcomes; endothelial cell loss; fluidics; phacoemulsification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23782595     DOI: 10.1111/aos.12200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  4 in total

1.  Elevated intraocular pressure causes cellular and molecular retinal injuries, advocating a more moderate intraocular pressure setting during phacoemulsification surgery.

Authors:  Zhenni Zhao; Xiaowei Yu; Xue Yang; Jiamin Zhang; Dandan Zhang; Nannan Sun; Zhigang Fan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Optimization of the Oertli CataRhex 3® phacoemulsification machine.

Authors:  Lance A Stutz; Joshua B Heczko; Brian A Bird; Rhett S Thomson; Ashlie A Bernhisel; William R Barlow; Brian Zaugg; Randall J Olson; Jeff H Pettey
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-16

3.  Anterior vitrectomy, phacoemulsification cataract extraction and irido-zonulo-hyaloid-vitrectomy in protracted acute angle closure crisis.

Authors:  Xiaowei Yu; Zhenni Zhao; Dandan Zhang; Xue Yang; Nannan Sun; Yixiu Lin; Jiamin Zhang; Zhigang Fan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Comparative anatomical outcomes of high-flow vs. low-flow phacoemulsification cataract surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Po-Chin Kuo; Jia-Horung Hung; Yu-Chen Su; Ching-Ju Fang; Chaw-Ning Lee; Yi-Hsun Huang; Shih-Chieh Shao; Edward Chia-Cheng Lai
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.