Literature DB >> 23782311

Lessons about terminal differentiation from the specification of color-detecting photoreceptors in the Drosophila retina.

Robert J Johnston1.   

Abstract

Metazoans require highly diverse collections of cell types to sense, interpret, and react to the environment. Developmental programs incorporate deterministic and stochastic strategies in different contexts or different combinations to establish this multitude of cell fates. Precise genetic dissection of the processes controlling terminal photoreceptor differentiation in the Drosophila retina has revealed complex regulatory mechanisms required to generate differences in gene expression and cell fate. In this review, I discuss how a gene regulatory network interprets stochastic and regional inputs to determine the specification of color-detecting photoreceptor subtypes in the Drosophila retina. These combinatorial gene regulatory mechanisms will likely be broadly applicable to nervous system development and cell fate specification in general.
© 2013 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rhodopsin; feedforward loop; regulatory network; retina; stochastic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23782311     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ancient default activators of terminal photoreceptor differentiation in the pancrustacean compound eye: the homeodomain transcription factors Otd and Pph13.

Authors:  Markus Friedrich; Tiffany Cook; Andrew C Zelhof
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 5.186

Review 2.  The evolutionary diversity of insect retinal mosaics: common design principles and emerging molecular logic.

Authors:  Mathias F Wernet; Michael W Perry; Claude Desplan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Regulatory logic driving stable levels of defective proventriculus expression during terminal photoreceptor specification in flies.

Authors:  Jenny Yan; Caitlin Anderson; Kayla Viets; Sang Tran; Gregory Goldberg; Stephen Small; Robert J Johnston
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 4.  Visual circuits in flies: beginning to see the whole picture.

Authors:  Rudy Behnia; Claude Desplan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Photoreceptor Patterning in Vertebrates and Invertebrates.

Authors:  Kayla Viets; Kiara Eldred; Robert J Johnston
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Polycomb group genes are required to maintain a binary fate choice in the Drosophila eye.

Authors:  Jennifer K Finley; Adam C Miller; Tory G Herman
Journal:  Neural Dev       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 7.  So many pieces, one puzzle: cell type specification and visual circuitry in flies and mice.

Authors:  Mathias F Wernet; Andrew D Huberman; Claude Desplan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Natural variation in stochastic photoreceptor specification and color preference in Drosophila.

Authors:  Cyrus Zhou; Annie Cho; Haziq Siddiqi; Caitlin Anderson; India Reiss; Benjamin Mormann; Cameron M Avelis; Peter Deford; Alan Bergland; Elijah Roberts; James Taylor; Daniel Vasiliauskas; Robert J Johnston
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Common transcriptional mechanisms for visual photoreceptor cell differentiation among Pancrustaceans.

Authors:  Simpla Mahato; Shinichi Morita; Abraham E Tucker; Xulong Liang; Magdalena Jackowska; Markus Friedrich; Yasuhiro Shiga; Andrew C Zelhof
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The whole genome sequence of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), reveals insights into the biology and adaptive evolution of a highly invasive pest species.

Authors:  Alexie Papanicolaou; Marc F Schetelig; Peter Arensburger; Peter W Atkinson; Joshua B Benoit; Kostas Bourtzis; Pedro Castañera; John P Cavanaugh; Hsu Chao; Christopher Childers; Ingrid Curril; Huyen Dinh; HarshaVardhan Doddapaneni; Amanda Dolan; Shannon Dugan; Markus Friedrich; Giuliano Gasperi; Scott Geib; Georgios Georgakilas; Richard A Gibbs; Sarah D Giers; Ludvik M Gomulski; Miguel González-Guzmán; Ana Guillem-Amat; Yi Han; Artemis G Hatzigeorgiou; Pedro Hernández-Crespo; Daniel S T Hughes; Jeffery W Jones; Dimitra Karagkouni; Panagiota Koskinioti; Sandra L Lee; Anna R Malacrida; Mosè Manni; Kostas Mathiopoulos; Angela Meccariello; Shwetha C Murali; Terence D Murphy; Donna M Muzny; Georg Oberhofer; Félix Ortego; Maria D Paraskevopoulou; Monica Poelchau; Jiaxin Qu; Martin Reczko; Hugh M Robertson; Andrew J Rosendale; Andrew E Rosselot; Giuseppe Saccone; Marco Salvemini; Grazia Savini; Patrick Schreiner; Francesca Scolari; Paolo Siciliano; Sheina B Sim; George Tsiamis; Enric Ureña; Ioannis S Vlachos; John H Werren; Ernst A Wimmer; Kim C Worley; Antigone Zacharopoulou; Stephen Richards; Alfred M Handler
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.