Hai Hu1, An An Xu, Anhua Huang. 1. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, East Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China. huhailc@sina.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We introduce a new laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using 2-mm needle-shape instruments and compare it with single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to June 2011, 60 patients who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria were prospectively selected and randomized to receive either a scar-hidden novel laparoscopic cholecystectomy (NLC group) (n=30) or a single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC group) (n=30). Their operation time, pain score, and satisfaction score were contrasted. RESULTS: All operations were successful. Two patients were converted to conventional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the SILC group. No postoperative complications occurred in both groups. The operation time was significantly lower in the NLC group (14.17±3.51 minutes in the NLC group versus 24.67±4.12 minutes in the SILC group, P<.01). As to the satisfaction score, the NLC group was superior to the SILC group (4.53±0.57 in the NLC group versus 4.07±0.52 in the SILC group P<.01). There was also a lower postoperative pain score in the NLC group, although the results did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The new scar-hidden laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible technique. Compared with single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, it has a lower operation time and less difficulty but a higher satisfaction score. It demonstrates a new approach for minimal invasive surgery.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We introduce a new laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using 2-mm needle-shape instruments and compare it with single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2011 to June 2011, 60 patients who satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria were prospectively selected and randomized to receive either a scar-hidden novel laparoscopic cholecystectomy (NLC group) (n=30) or a single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC group) (n=30). Their operation time, pain score, and satisfaction score were contrasted. RESULTS: All operations were successful. Two patients were converted to conventional three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the SILC group. No postoperative complications occurred in both groups. The operation time was significantly lower in the NLC group (14.17±3.51 minutes in the NLC group versus 24.67±4.12 minutes in the SILC group, P<.01). As to the satisfaction score, the NLC group was superior to the SILC group (4.53±0.57 in the NLC group versus 4.07±0.52 in the SILC group P<.01). There was also a lower postoperative pain score in the NLC group, although the results did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The new scar-hidden laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible technique. Compared with single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, it has a lower operation time and less difficulty but a higher satisfaction score. It demonstrates a new approach for minimal invasive surgery.
Authors: Thom E Lobe; Lucian Panait; Giovanni Dapri; Peter M Denk; David Pechman; Luca Milone; Stefan Scholz; Bethany J Slater Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 3.453