Literature DB >> 23781401

Potential Role of Community-Based Healthcare System Data in Research on Survivors of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer.

Ann M Geiger1, Sharon M Castellino, Janet A Tooze, Andrea Altschuler, Stacy Month, Ann C Mertens, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Sarah M Greene.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to examine issues of generalizability in research on adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivorship that relies on using community-based healthcare delivery system data.
METHODS: Individuals aged 15 to 39 diagnosed with cancer between 1992 and 2006 were identified using data from community-based healthcare systems in California and Seattle. Loss to follow-up was defined as the first disenrollment (the end) of membership in the healthcare systems after cancer. Censoring occurred at death or study end (2009). We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to quantify follow-up, and multiple Cox regression to examine the association of follow-up loss with demographic and cancer characteristics.
RESULTS: Of 6828 eligible AYAs, most (93%) were aged between 20 and 39 years at diagnosis; 62% were female and 39% were non-White. Solid tumors accounted for 81% of diagnoses. The majority (89%) of patients continued to be members of the healthcare systems and available for follow-up 1 year after diagnosis. Approximately 60% remained enrolled 5 years after diagnosis. Loss to follow-up was associated with younger age at diagnosis, male gender, and African American or Hispanic race/ethnicity.
CONCLUSION: Data from community-based healthcare delivery systems offer an efficient way to identify large and diverse samples of AYA-onset cancer survivors. Differential loss to follow-up can threaten the generalizability of results from these studies and should be assessed quantitatively. Healthcare system data offer an alternative to studies requiring direct contact with participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias; epidemiologic methods; healthcare research; survivorship

Year:  2013        PMID: 23781401      PMCID: PMC3684133          DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2012.0033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol        ISSN: 2156-5333            Impact factor:   2.223


  11 in total

Review 1.  Potential favorable impact of the affordable care act of 2010 on cancer in young adults in the United States.

Authors:  W Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Classification schemes for tumors diagnosed in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Ronald D Barr; Eric J Holowaty; Jillian M Birch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Pediatric cancer survivorship research: experience of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Wendy M Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Gregory T Armstrong; Marilyn A Stovall; Joseph P Neglia; Jennifer Q Lanctot; John D Boice; John A Whitton; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Accounting for bias due to selective attrition: the example of smoking and cognitive decline.

Authors:  Jennifer Weuve; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; M Maria Glymour; Todd L Beck; Neelum T Aggarwal; Robert S Wilson; Denis A Evans; Carlos F Mendes de Leon
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Building a virtual cancer research organization.

Authors:  Mark C Hornbrook; Gene Hart; Jennifer L Ellis; Donald J Bachman; Gary Ansell; Sarah M Greene; Edward H Wagner; Roy Pardee; Mark M Schmidt; Ann Geiger; Amy L Butani; Terry Field; Hassan Fouayzi; Irina Miroshnik; Liyan Liu; Robert Diseker; Karen Wells; Rick Krajenta; Lois Lamerato; Christine Neslund Dudas
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2005

Review 6.  Building a research consortium of large health systems: the Cancer Research Network.

Authors:  Edward H Wagner; Sarah M Greene; Gene Hart; Terry S Field; Suzanne Fletcher; Ann M Geiger; Lisa J Herrinton; Mark C Hornbrook; Christine C Johnson; Judy Mouchawar; Sharon J Rolnick; Victor J Stevens; Stephen H Taplin; Dennis Tolsma; Thomas M Vogt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2005

7.  Research challenges in adolescent and young adult cancer survivor research.

Authors:  Emily S Tonorezos; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Survivorship research based in integrated healthcare delivery systems: the Cancer Research Network.

Authors:  Ann M Geiger; Diana S M Buist; Sarah M Greene; Andrea Altschuler; Terry S Field
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: a multi-institutional collaborative project.

Authors:  Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens; John D Boice; Norman E Breslow; Sarah S Donaldson; Daniel M Green; Frederic P Li; Anna T Meadows; John J Mulvihill; Joseph P Neglia; Mark E Nesbit; Roger J Packer; John D Potter; Charles A Sklar; Malcolm A Smith; Marilyn Stovall; Louise C Strong; Yutaka Yasui; Lonnie K Zeltzer
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  2002-04

10.  Recruitment and follow-up of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: the AYA HOPE Study.

Authors:  Linda C Harlan; Charles F Lynch; Theresa H M Keegan; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Ikuko Kato; Michele M West; Rosemary D Cress; Stephen M Schwartz; Ashley W Smith; Dennis Deapen; Sonja M Stringer; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.442

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Cancer Research Network: a platform for epidemiologic and health services research on cancer prevention, care, and outcomes in large, stable populations.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Rebecca Ziebell; Robert T Greenlee; Stacey Honda; Mark C Hornbrook; Mara Epstein; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Pamala A Pawloski; Debra P Ritzwoller; Nirupa R Ghai; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Heather A Clancy; V Paul Doria-Rose; Lawrence H Kushi
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 2.506

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.