Literature DB >> 23780842

High resolution microendoscopy for classification of colorectal polyps.

S S Chang1, R Shukla, A D Polydorides, P M Vila, M Lee, H Han, P Kedia, J Lewis, S Gonzalez, M K Kim, N Harpaz, J Godbold, R Richards-Kortum, S Anandasabapathy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: It can be difficult to distinguish adenomas from benign polyps during routine colonoscopy. High resolution microendoscopy (HRME) is a novel method for imaging colorectal mucosa with subcellular detail. HRME criteria for the classification of colorectal neoplasia have not been previously described. Study goals were to develop criteria to characterize HRME images of colorectal mucosa (normal, hyperplastic polyps, adenomas, cancer) and to determine the accuracy and interobserver variability for the discrimination of neoplastic from non-neoplastic polyps when these criteria were applied by novice and expert microendoscopists.
METHODS: Two expert pathologists created consensus HRME image criteria using images from 68 patients with polyps who had undergone colonoscopy plus HRME. Using these criteria, HRME expert and novice microendoscopists were shown a set of training images and then tested to determine accuracy and interobserver variability.
RESULTS: Expert microendoscopists identified neoplasia with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 67 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 58 % - 75 %), 97 % (94 % - 100 %), and 87 %, respectively. Nonexperts achieved sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 73 % (66 % - 80 %), 91 % (80 % - 100 %), and 85 %, respectively. Overall, neoplasia were identified with sensitivity 70 % (65 % - 76 %), specificity 94 % (87 % - 100 %), and accuracy 85 %. Kappa values were: experts 0.86; nonexperts 0.72; and overall 0.78.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the new criteria, observers achieved high specificity and substantial interobserver agreement for distinguishing benign polyps from neoplasia. Increased expertise in HRME imaging improves accuracy. This low-cost microendoscopic platform may be an alternative to confocal microendoscopy in lower-resource or community-based settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23780842     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  17 in total

Review 1.  Fluorescence Imaging for Cancer Screening and Surveillance.

Authors:  K E Tipirneni; E L Rosenthal; L S Moore; A D Haskins; N Udayakumar; A H Jani; W R Carroll; A B Morlandt; M Bogyo; J Rao; Jason M Warram
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Optimizing modulation frequency for structured illumination in a fiber-optic microendoscope to image nuclear morphometry in columnar epithelium.

Authors:  P A Keahey; T S Tkaczyk; K M Schmeler; R R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Multimodal Imaging and Spectroscopy Fiber-bundle Microendoscopy Platform for Non-invasive, In Vivo Tissue Analysis.

Authors:  Gage J Greening; Narasimhan Rajaram; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Differential structured illumination microendoscopy for in vivo imaging of molecular contrast agents.

Authors:  Pelham Keahey; Preetha Ramalingam; Kathleen Schmeler; Rebecca R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  In vivo classification of colorectal neoplasia using high-resolution microendoscopy: Improvement with experience.

Authors:  Neil D Parikh; Daniel Perl; Michelle H Lee; Shannon S Chang; Alexandros D Polydorides; Erin Moshier; James Godbold; Elinor Zhou; Josephine Mitcham; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.029

6.  Fiber-bundle microendoscopy with sub-diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and intensity mapping for multimodal optical biopsy of stratified epithelium.

Authors:  Gage J Greening; Haley M James; Amy J Powless; Joshua A Hutcheson; Mary K Dierks; Narasimhan Rajaram; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Diagnostic value of high-resolution micro-endoscopy for the classification of colon polyps.

Authors:  Tao Tan; Ya-Wei Qu; Juan Shu; Min-Li Liu; Ling Zhang; Hai-Feng Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  High-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Justin S Louie; Richa Shukla; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.043

9.  In vivo diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution microendoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal polyps: a prospective study.

Authors:  Neil D Parikh; Daniel Perl; Michelle H Lee; Brijen Shah; Yuki Young; Shannon S Chang; Richa Shukla; Alexandros D Polydorides; Erin Moshier; James Godbold; Elinor Zhou; Josephine Mitcham; Rebecca Richards-Kortum; Sharmila Anandasabapathy
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  In vivo measurement of non-keratinized squamous epithelium using a spectroscopic microendoscope with multiple source-detector separations.

Authors:  Gage J Greening; Narasimhan Rajaram; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.