Literature DB >> 23780725

Low self-control promotes the willingness to sacrifice in close relationships.

Francesca Righetti1, Catrin Finkenauer, Eli J Finkel.   

Abstract

Although previous theories and research have suggested that human behavior is automatically driven by selfish impulses (e.g., vengeance rather than forgiveness), the present research tested the hypothesis that in close relationships, people's impulsive inclination is to be prosocial and to sacrifice for their partner-to pursue the interests of the partner or of the relationship at some costs for the self. Results from four studies demonstrated that people with low self-control, relative to those with high self-control, reported greater willingness to sacrifice for their close others. Furthermore, Study 4 demonstrated that communal orientation was more strongly associated with sacrifice among participants with low self-control than participants with high self-control. This moderational pattern supports the hypothesis that communal orientation functions as a default approach to sacrifice in the context of close relationships. Taken together, these findings suggest that under certain crucial conditions in close relationships, gut-level impulses are more likely than deliberative considerations to promote prorelationship behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  close relationships; heuristics; interpersonal relationships; prosocial behavior; sacrifice; self-control; social behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23780725     DOI: 10.1177/0956797613475457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  10 in total

1.  When is giving an impulse? An ERP investigation of intuitive prosocial behavior.

Authors:  Ryan W Carlson; Lara B Aknin; Mario Liotti
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Perceived Partner's Self-Control and Social Support Effects on Relationship Satisfaction in Couples Experiencing Infertility or Miscarriage: Dyadic Analyses.

Authors:  Anna Wendołowska; Ewa Kiełek-Rataj; Alicja Kalus; Dorota Czyżowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  The collective benefits of feeling good and letting go: positive emotion and (dis)inhibition interact to predict cooperative behavior.

Authors:  David G Rand; Gordon Kraft-Todd; June Gruber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Risking your life without a second thought: intuitive decision-making and extreme altruism.

Authors:  David G Rand; Ziv G Epstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Time pressure increases cooperation in competitively framed social dilemmas.

Authors:  Jeremy Cone; David G Rand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The relation between bystanders' behavioral reactivity to distress and later helping behavior during a violent conflict in virtual reality.

Authors:  Ruud Hortensius; Solène Neyret; Mel Slater; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Social setting, intuition and experience in laboratory experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making.

Authors:  Valerio Capraro; Giorgia Cococcioni
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.530

8.  A theory of social thermoregulation in human primates.

Authors:  Hans IJzerman; James A Coan; Fieke M A Wagemans; Marjolein A Missler; Ilja van Beest; Siegwart Lindenberg; Mattie Tops
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-21

9.  Self-Control Modulates the Behavioral Response of Interpersonal Forgiveness.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Haijiang Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-27

10.  Why Do People With Self-Control Forgive Others Easily? The Role of Rumination and Anger.

Authors:  Fanchang Kong; Haibo Zhang; Haishuo Xia; Bo Huang; Jingkuan Qin; Yan Zhang; Xiaojun Sun; Zongkui Zhou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-02-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.