Literature DB >> 23778374

Survey of inspection and palpation rates among spine providers: evaluation of physician performance of the physical examination for patients with low back pain.

Joel Press1, Brian Liem, David Walega, Steven Garfin.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Survey from July 2011 to April 2012 of adult patients with primary complaint of low back pain (LBP).
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of physical examination being performed by various providers, as measured by frequency of inspection and palpation, of patients with LBP and to describe patient ratings of these examinations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The physical examination is a cornerstone of any evaluation of patients with LBP. With increasing reliance on diagnostic imaging, there is concern that patients are not being examined comprehensively, but to our knowledge, no studies have ever investigated how often the physical examination is performed in patients with LBP.
METHODS: Survey participants were asked to list the types of physicians that they had seen for LBP within the past 1 year and for each physician encounter to answer 2 "yes/no" questions: (1) whether they had removed their clothes or put on a gown or shorts during the examination (our proxy for inspection) and (2) whether the provider had placed his or her hands on the patient (our proxy for palpation). Subjects also provided quality ratings for each provider's physical examination. Main outcome measures included frequency of inspection and palpation and subjects' ratings of each physical examination.
RESULTS: A total of 295 surveys were collected reflecting 696 prior physician encounters. Inspection was done in 57% of physician encounters. Across specialties, orthopedic surgeons had the highest reported rate of inspection at 72%. The worst was among chiropractors at 40%. Palpation occurred in 80% of physician encounters. Chiropractors had the highest rate of palpation at 94%. The lowest rate was among neurosurgeons at 58%.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that approximately 43% of patient visits for LBP involved no inspection and nearly 20% without palpation. These numbers reflect a need for improvement among providers who treat patients with LBP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23778374     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ff32f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  3 in total

1.  Beware of the Film Findings!: Low Back Pain Patients and Healthy Volunteers Have A Similar X-Ray Appearance.

Authors:  Roger P Jackson; Travis J Rump; Anne C McManus; Jill A Moore; Andy S Lee
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

2.  Can a self-administered questionnaire identify workers with chronic or recurring low back pain?

Authors:  Karina Satiko Takekawa; Josiane Sotrate Gonçalves; Cristiane Shinohara Moriguchi; Helenice Jane Cote Gil Coury; Tatiana de Oliveira Sato
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 3.  Neuropathic low back pain in clinical practice.

Authors:  R Baron; A Binder; N Attal; R Casale; A H Dickenson; R-D Treede
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.931

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.