Literature DB >> 23778369

Routine postoperative imaging early after lumbar decompression surgery: a prospective evaluation.

Gerrit Alexander Schubert1, Michaels Diepers, Aldemar Andres Hegewald, Marcel Seiz, Claudius Thomé.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of routine postoperative magnetic resonance imaging early after lumbar decompression in patients with nonspecific symptoms. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Imaging after lumbar surgery may be performed more readily in patients even with nonspecific symptoms and without neurological deficit.
METHODS: Patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery completed standardized questionnaires, were assessed neurologically on admission, and underwent magnetic resonance scanning within 72 hours after surgery. Residual stenosis was graded as absent or mild (outcome A) or moderate to severe (outcome B). Surgical technique and intraoperative complications and postoperative neurological status were recorded.
RESULTS: We recruited 28 consecutive patients who reported significant improvement in preoperative symptoms. In two-thirds of all patients, postoperative images showed at least one segment with moderate or severe residual stenosis (outcome B). Radiological outcome did not correlate with postoperative pain. Patient satisfaction index was comparable in groups A and B. The cross section of the spinal canal was significantly wider with a drain in situ. This did not, however, translate into a difference in overall visual analogue scale score or wound discomfort. Patients tended to report more back and leg pain with drains and were less satisfied with the result of the operation.
CONCLUSION: Early postoperative magnetic resonance scans in patients with nonspecific symptoms frequently show radiologically relevant stenosis, which is associated with neither outcome nor patient satisfaction. Drain placement is associated with less radiological narrowing but with lower patient satisfaction. Imaging without clinical correlate may yield nondiscriminatory information likely to unsettle and puzzle both patients and health care providers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23778369     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829fc6a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Association of postoperative covert stroke and cognitive dysfunction among elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: protocol for a prospective cohort study (PRECISION study).

Authors:  Qianyu Cui; Dexiang Wang; Min Zeng; Jia Dong; Hailong Jin; Zhengfang Hu; Yuan Zhang; Yuming Peng; Ruquan Han
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI.

Authors:  Catharina Schenck; Job van Susante; Maarten van Gorp; Ruben Belder; Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  A prospective randomized multicenter phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of NOVOCART disk plus autologous disk chondrocyte transplantation in the treatment of nucleotomized and degenerative lumbar disks to avoid secondary disease: safety results of Phase I-a short report.

Authors:  Anja Tschugg; Michael Diepers; Steinert Simone; Felix Michnacs; Sebastian Quirbach; Martin Strowitzki; Hans Jörg Meisel; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Should We Check the Routine Postoperative MRI for Hematoma in Spinal Decompression Surgery?

Authors:  Hun-Kyu Shin; Hwa-Jae Jeong; Eugene Kim; Jai Hyung Park; Se-Jin Park; Yongun Cho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-05-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.